For the purposes of this section, in determining whether any person is acting as an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently... Monthly Labor Review - Halaman 145oleh United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics - 1949Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
| United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics - 1949 - 786 halaman
...its agents or representatives, which occurs during the life of this National agreement. 821018—49 2 A significant 5-year arbitration agreement, barring...contracts adopted during the year defined "agents," or Usted the authorized agents and required that their names should be furnished to the other parties... | |
| United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1947 - 994 halaman
...an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. RESTRICTIONS ON PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVES SEC. 302. (a; It shall... | |
| United States. National Railroad Adjustment Board - 1018 halaman
...an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." The Railway Labor Act, although it does not specifically incorporate the... | |
| United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1948 - 994 halaman
...an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. RESTRICTIONS ON PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYES REPRESENTATIVES SEC. 302. (a) It shall... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1949 - 474 halaman
...acting as agent of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. But the Taft-Hartley rules does not specifically apply to antitrust actions.... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1949 - 1864 halaman
...an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." Damage suits for injury to business or property by reason of so-called secondary... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - 1949 - 720 halaman
...as an agent of another person so as to make such other persons responsible for his act, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. 6. Strikebreaking (a) Act No. 192, Laws 1948: (1) It is unlawful to transport... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - 1949 - 1032 halaman
...an 'agent' of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling." Damage suits for injury to business or property by reason of so-called "seoomlary... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1950 - 780 halaman
...an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. That leaves a union in a most vulnerable position. You have to examine your... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1950 - 336 halaman
...an "agent" of another person so as to make such other person responsible for his acts, the question of whether the specific acts performed were actually authorized or subsequently ratified shall not be controlling. The two obviously provide different standards of proof. While section 6 of... | |
| |