White House Travel Office--day One: Hearing Before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, October 24, 1995U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995 - 646 halaman |
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
Administration allegations asked Attorney audit auditors Bill Billy Dale Bruce Lindsey calls Hubbell Cerda CGEPR Chairman checks CLINGER Clinton close quote COLLINS OF ILLINOIS committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Cornelius costs Counsel criminal Darnell Martens David Watkins Dee Dee Dee Dee Myers Department Deputy Director disbursements discussed documents Federal aircraft firings gentleman George Stephanopoulos going GUTKNECHT Harry Thomason hearing House Travel Office ICAP interview investigation involved issue Jeff John Podesta Justice KANJORSKI Kennedy KINGSBURY LATOURETTE Mack McLarty management review Markie Post McLarty meeting memo MICA notes Nussbaum operations Patsy Thomasson Peat Marwick petty cash PODESTA President press travel office question request response SHAHEEN statement talking Thank tion told Travel Office employees Travel Office matter trip worksheet UltrAir Vince Foster WAXMAN White House Counsel White House Management White House Travel WHTO
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 555 - that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.
Halaman 555 - Appeals the suppression of this confession was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals relied in the main on two decisions from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals — United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 195 F.
Halaman 554 - Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 (1963), the US Supreme Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.
Halaman 558 - We therefore reverse the judgment of the Maryland Court of Appeals, and remand the case to that Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views stated here and in our opinion in Reynolds v. Sims.
Halaman 555 - The petition for post-conviction relief was dismissed by the trial court; and on appeal the Court of Appeals held that suppression of the evidence by the prosecution denied petitioner due process of law and remanded the case for a retrial of the question of guilt. 226 Md. 422, 174 A.
Halaman 557 - We read that statement as a ruling on the admissibility of the confession on the issue of innocence or guilt. A sporting theory of justice might assume that if the suppressed confession had been used at the first trial, the judge's ruling that it was not admissible on the issue of innocence or guilt might have been flouted by the jury just as might have been done if the court had first admitted a confession and then stricken it from the...
Halaman 558 - If the court finds in favor of the petitioner, it shall enter an appropriate order with respect to the judgment or sentence in the former proceedings, and any supplementary orders as to rearraignment, retrial, custody, bail, discharge, correction of sentence, or other matters that may be necessary and proper.
Halaman 135 - This concludes my prepared statement, Mr. Chairman. I will be happy to answer any questions you or members of the committee might have.
Halaman 555 - Nor may a State, through the action of its officers, contrive a conviction through the pretense of a trial which in truth is "but used as a means of depriving a defendant of liberty through a deliberate deception of court and jury by the presentation of testimony known to be perjured.
Halaman 495 - ... ended, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.