 | Michigan - 1850 - 40 halaman
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal § 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1850 - 990 halaman
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - 1851 - 1348 halaman
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1887 - 736 halaman
...Robinson v. McAfee Ettate, 375. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 1. The purpose of the constitutional provision that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title " [sec. 20, Art. 4] was to prevent "the practice of bringing together mto one bill subjects diverse... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 halaman
...this amendment comes within the prohibition of section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution then in force. "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." The amendment is inconsistent with, and outside of the purpose indicated by, the title of the original... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 784 halaman
...that the statute is unconstitutional, nnder Article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. The section of Howell's Statutes, 9175, was added to our criminal laws by Act No. 116, Laws of 1867.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1893 - 788 halaman
...— It does not violate section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of Michigan, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides for the election of alternate electors, whereas the title relates only to choosing... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 halaman
...therefore that, as to those provisions, the act was invalid under section 21, art. 5, of the Constitution : "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." This law is penal in character. One convicted for a violation of its provisions is liable to both fine... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1886 - 744 halaman
...four grounds, namely : First. That it is in conflict with the provision of the Constitution that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Second. That it violates another provision of the Constitution, to wit : " No law shall be revised,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 782 halaman
...embrace two objects, and are therefore in violation of section 20 of Article 4 of the Constitution, that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2. The court did not acquire jurisdiction by the service of its subpoena upon the defendants, who were... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. 
