Whither Jerusalem?: Proposals and Positions Concerning the Future of JerusalemMartinus Nijhoff Publishers, 28 Jun 1995 - 182 halaman The future of Jerusalem is the most difficult issue facing negotiators, political and legal experts. In the current peace talks between Israel and its neighbours, it has been agreed to postpone discussion on Jerusalem to the latest stage of the peace process. But the Jerusalem question continues to come to the fore at every turn, always charged with intensely emotional and uncompromising statements: not only from those parties who are directly involved, but also by eminent personalities, organizations and states elsewhere. The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies has collected 55 proposals: 12 were written between 1916-1950 and 43 between 1967-1993. Their authors, coming from various countries, present various approaches to the three main issues at stake: sovereignty, holy places, and municipal governance. "Whither Jerusalem?" summarizes each of the 55 proposals, gives brief information about their authors, and analyzes the similarities and divergences between them. The official position of five states and organizations is included, as well as a lexicon of terms used by the authors of the proposals. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 18
Halaman
... Zone ........... 4 . Capitulations ......... 5. Church of the Holy Sepulcher Condominium ....... 6 . 7 . Corpus separatum 8 . Demilitarization ......... 9. Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities 10. Enclave .......... 11. The Holy Places ...
... Zone ........... 4 . Capitulations ......... 5. Church of the Holy Sepulcher Condominium ....... 6 . 7 . Corpus separatum 8 . Demilitarization ......... 9. Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities 10. Enclave .......... 11. The Holy Places ...
Halaman 4
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 32
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 39
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 51
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Isi
Chapter One THE LEGAL STATUS OF JERUSALEM | 1 |
B Opinions on the Legal Status of Jerusalem According to International Law | 15 |
2 East Jerusalem | 18 |
The Legal Status of Jerusalem According to Israeli Law | 22 |
Chapter Two PROPOSALS AND POSITIONS CONCERNING THE FUTURE OF JERUSALEM | 25 |
The British Mandate for Palestine 1922 | 26 |
Proposal of Dr Chaim Arlosoroff 1932 | 27 |
The Peel Commission Report 1937 | 28 |
Proposal by Dr Walid Khalidi 1978 1988 | 98 |
Proposal by David IshShalom 1987 | 99 |
Proposal by Dr Grant Littke 1988 | 100 |
Proposal by John V Whitbeck 19891994 | 101 |
Proposal by Raphael Cidor 1989 | 103 |
Proposal by Professor Gidon Gottlieb 1989 | 105 |
Proposal by Shmuel Toledano 1991 | 106 |
Proposal by Professor Daniel Elazar 1991 | 107 |
Proposal of the Jewish Agency 1938 | 29 |
Report of Sir William Fitzgerald 1945 | 30 |
The MorrisonGrady Committee Report 1946 | 32 |
Proposal of the Minority of UNSCOP 1947 | 34 |
The Resolution on the Future Government of Palestine The Partition Resolution of the U N General Assembly Resolution 181 II 1947 | 36 |
Proposal of the Archbishop of Canterbury 1949 | 39 |
A Draft Statute for Jerusalem 1950 | 40 |
Proposal by the Government of Israel 1950 | 43 |
Proposal Submitted by Sweden 1950 | 45 |
Proposal by Professor Benjamin Akzin 1967 | 47 |
Proposal by Professor Avigdor Levontin 1967 | 48 |
Proposal by the Government of Israel after the SixDay War 19671969 | 50 |
Proposal by Dr Meron Benvenisti 1968 | 52 |
Proposal by Professor Elihu Lauterpacht CBE Q C 1968 | 59 |
The Rogers Plan U S Secretary of State William Rogers 1969 | 60 |
Proposal by Evan M Wilson 1969 | 61 |
Proposal by Professor W Michael Reisman 1970 | 63 |
Proposal by Dr Raphael Benkler 1972 | 65 |
Proposals of Sen Richard Nixon and Sen J William Fulbright 1967 and 1974 | 67 |
Report of the Aspen Institute 1975 | 69 |
Report of the Brookings Institution 1975 | 71 |
The Allon Plan 1976 | 72 |
Proposal by Ambassador James George 1978 | 73 |
Proposal by Dr Shmuel Berkovitz 1978 | 74 |
Proposal by Dr Joėlle Le Morzellec 1979 | 79 |
Proposal by Lord Caradon 1980 | 81 |
Proposal by Yaakov Hazan 1980 | 82 |
Proposal by Mark Gruhin 1980 | 84 |
Peace Plan by Crown Prince Fahd of Saudi Arabia 1981 | 86 |
Proposal by the Honourable Terence Prittie 1981 | 87 |
Proposal by Professor Saul Cohen 1981 | 88 |
Proposal by Dr Henry Cattan 1981 | 90 |
Proposal by Professor Gerald I A D Draper OBE 1981 | 91 |
Resolution of the Arab Summit Conference at Fez 1982 | 92 |
Proposal by Justice Haim Cohn 1982 | 93 |
Proposal by Ambassador Gideon Rafael 1983 | 95 |
Proposal by Professor Antonio Cassese 1986 | 96 |
Proposal by Professor Thomas and Ms Sally Mallison 1981 1986 | 97 |
Proposal by Palestinian and Israeli Peace Activists 1991 | 109 |
Proposal by Dr Sari Nusseibeh and Dr Mark Heller 1991 | 111 |
Proposal by Professor Francis A Boyle 1992 | 113 |
Proposal by H E Ambassador Adnan Abu Odeh 1992 | 115 |
Proposal by Dr Cecilia Albin Moshe Amirav and Hanna Siniora 1992 | 117 |
Proposal by the IsraelPalestine Center for Research and Information IPCRI 1994 | 121 |
Position of the Palestine Liberation Organization | 126 |
Position of the Vatican | 127 |
Position of Egypt | 129 |
Position of the Hamas | 131 |
Position of the United States | 132 |
Position of Jordan | 135 |
Chapter ThreeCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROPOSALS AND POSITIONS ACCORDING TO SPECIFIC SUBJECTS | 137 |
B National Aspirations | 138 |
Holy Places | 140 |
Municipal Administration | 143 |
Chapter Four LEXICON OF TERMS | 145 |
Autonomy | 146 |
Buffer Zone | 149 |
Capitulations | 150 |
Condominium | 151 |
Corpus separatum | 152 |
Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities | 153 |
Enclave | 156 |
The Holy Places | 157 |
Internationalization | 160 |
Mandate | 161 |
Neutrality and Neutralization | 162 |
Sovereignty | 163 |
Status quo in Religious Matters | 165 |
The Supreme Muslim Council and the Supreme Islamic Authority | 166 |
The Temple Mount | 167 |
The U N Trusteeship Council | 168 |
The Vatican | 169 |
Waqf | 170 |
The Western Wall | 172 |
174 | |
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Whither Jerusalem?:Proposals and Petitions Concerning the Future of Jerusalem Moshe Hirsch,Deborah Housen-Couriel,Ruth Lapidoth Pratinjau tidak tersedia - 1995 |
Istilah dan frasa umum
according annexation Arab Jerusalem Arab-Israeli conflict arrangements Article authority Background Beit Beit Jalla borough councils British Mandate capital of Israel Cattan Christian City of Jerusalem city's Commissioner condominium corpus separatum Court declared demilitarized Dinstein diplomatic dispute east Jerusalem elected ensure established existing rights Freedom of access Gaza Strip granted guaranteed Holy Places Ibid immunities institutions international law internationalization Islamic Israeli Israeli and Palestinian Israeli law Jewish Jews Jordan Jordanian jurisdiction Knesset Lapidoth & Hirsch legislation Lexicon Middle East mission Mount Scopus Municipal Administration Muslim National Aspirations negotiations neutral Old City Palestine parties Partition Resolution Peace political position powers proposal regarding religious communities representatives residents sacred Security Council settlement Six-Day Six-Day War Source sovereign sovereignty status of Jerusalem status quo supervision Temple Mount territory treaty Trusteeship Council U.N. General Assembly United Nations Vatican City vested Waqf West Bank Western Wall worship zone