...interpreter of the Constitution, Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial power of the United States" vested in the federal courts by Art. III. § 1 of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...

...the Court recognized that powers vested in one branch of government cannot be shared with another: "(T]he 'judicial power of the United States' vested in the federal courts by Art. III. S 1 can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the C'lief Executive, for example, can...

...interpreter of the Constitution." Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial power of the United States" vested in the federal courts by Art III, 8 1 of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...

...in United States v. Nixon itself: Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial power of the United States" vested in...the Judiciary the power to override a presidential veto. Any other conclusion would be contrary to the basic concept of separation of powers and the checks...

...interpreter of the Constitution" Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial Power of the United States" vested in the federal courts by Art III, § 1, of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...

...interpreter of the Constitution" [1016] Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial Power of the United States" vested in the federal courts by Art III, § 1, of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...

...by Art. Ill, 5 {1, of the Constitution can no more be A shared with the Executive Branch than the 7 Chief Executive, for example, can share with the Judiciary...or the Congress share with the Judiciary the power 10 to override a Presidential veto.... We therefore reaffirm that it is the province and duty of this...

...21 tecum was issued by a federal court even Che president must comply. Chief Justice Burger wrote: [T]he 'Judicial Power of the United States' vested in the federal courts by Art. Ill, fl, of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive, for...

...(1977). 1984] AGENClES PLACE lN GOVERNMENT 617 One example of this approach is United States v. Nixon,114 President Nixon's failing effort to resist the subpoena...United States' vested in the federal courts by Art. lll, § 1, of the Constitution can no more be shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...

...v. Nixon. 418 US at 706. However, Notwithstanding the deference each branch must accord the others, the "judicial Power of the United States" vested in the federal courts by Art. II, S 1 , of the Constitution can be no more shared with the Executive Branch than the Chief Executive,...