Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Judicial dissents; Ablemann v. Booth

Judicial dissents; Worcester v. Georgia

[blocks in formation]

II. The final power to interpret authoritatively resides in

the Supreme Court of the United States

Question stated, whether each department may interpret for itself,
or whether the Supreme Court must interpret for all

General acceptance of latter view

Contrary theories; Jefferson's and Jackson's, considered

[ocr errors]

The interdependence of the three departments of government . 137
Consequences of conceding the power to each department to inter-

pret authoritatively

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

A single arbiter necessary; nature of the Constitution as a funda-
mental statute requiring a judicial interpretation
Function of the judiciary to interpret statutes, conceded
English courts do not have the power, because there is no written
constitution binding on the government
Provisions of the Constitution which support these conclusions 144, 145
Objections to the power considered; that the court is not progres-
sive

Objections that this power would make the court the supreme law-

giver

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

155-157

[blocks in formation]

Powers of states to determine qualifications of electors

Power of Congress to guarantee a republican form of government;

its meaning and extent

206-209

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

These provisions generally found in state constitutions .

To whom are these negative provisions addressed

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

Murphy v. The People; Barker v. The People; James v. The

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]
« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »