Saratoga Seltzer Spring Company, Actiengesellschaft Apollinaris-Brunnen v....... 117 314 246 14 273 144 79 192 279 75 39 ..216, 222, 234, 332 17 304 258 280 91 161 167 236 15 American Middlings Purifier Company v. Atlantic Milling Company 393 638 Atlantic Giant Powder Company v. Rand et al.. 484 539 Atlantic Milling Company, American Middlings Purifier Company v. 393 465 California Powder Works et al., Giant Powder Company v 356 582 Clark et al., Garretson v Carbon Stove Company, Thatcher Heating Company v.. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Sayles ....... City of Detroit, Phillips et al. v Clements, Odorless Excavating Apparatus Company v 474 349 516 562 595 605 Clough v. Gilbert and Barker Manufacturing Company et al...... 468 Coe, Bates et al. v.... 365 Cohn v. National Rubber Company 448 Colgate v. Gold and Stock Telegraph Company.. Cooke et al. v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company... Dausman & Drummond Tobacco Company v. Ruffner et al Gear v. Fitch.... Giant Powder Company v. California Powder Works et al Page 653 356 468 553 638 447 514 610 H. Hanford et al. v. Westcott et al................ 649 Haskell et al. v. Shoe Machinery Manufacturing Company et al .... 402 Herz et al. Gardner et al. v 634 Newton et al., Cammeyer et al. v 448 586 598 582 607 New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Cooke et al. v............... Pultz & Walkley Company, Union Paper Bag Machine Company v 386 Q. Rand et al., Atlantic Giant Powder Company " Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad Company, Sayles v. Sayles, Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company v... Sayles v. Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad Company. Shoe Machinery Manufacturing Company et al., Haskell et al. v Shoe Machinery Manufacturing Company et al., Thomas et al. v Union Paper Bag Machine Company v. Pultz & Walkley Company. 529 |