Page (Chinese Laundry Case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1885; 113 U. S. 703, FIELD, J., Vol. II, 131 Soulard VS. United States (Smith vs. United States). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 4 Peters, 511, MARSHALL, Ch. J., and 1836, 10 Peters, 100 and 326, BALDWIN, J., Vol. I, 538, 554, 559 Vol. II, 147, 165, 178 Southack, Fox vs. See Fox vs. Southack. South Carolina Dispensary Vol. II, Spoliation Claims. See French Spoliation Cases. Sprague vs. Thompson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1886; 118 U. S. 90, MATTHEWS, J., Vol. I, Sprague, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Sprague. Springville vs. Thomas. U. 548 S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 166 U. S. 707, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 539 Spybuck, Summers VS. See Summers vs. Spybuck. Stanton, Georgia VS. See 167 221 State of Arkansas, Wilburn vs. See Wilburn vs. State of Arkansas, State of California, Almy vs. See Almy vs. California. State of California, Hurtado vs. See Hurtado vs. California. State of California, McCall vs. See McCall vs. California. State of California, People of, vs. Gerke. See People vs. Gerke. State of California, People of, vs. Naglee. See People vs. Naglee. State of California, People of, vs. Washington. See Peo Page ple (Cala.) vs. Washington. State of Georgia vs. Brailsford. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1794; 3 Dallas, 1, JAY, Ch. J., (and other justices), Vol. II, State of Georgia vs. Stanton. See Georgia vs. Stanton. State of Georgia, Cherokee Nation vs. See Cherokee Nation vs. State of Georgia. State of Georgia, Chisholm vs. See Chisholm vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Lascelles vs. See Lascelles vs. Georgia. State of Georgia, Worcester vs. See Worcester vs. Georgia. State of Illinois, Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. See Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Ker vs. See Ker vs. State of Illinois. State of Illinois, Moore VS. See Moore vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Munn vs. See Munn vs. Illinois. State of Illinois, Spies vs. Spies vs. Illinois. See 11 son vs. See Frederickson vs. State of Louisiana. State of Louisiana, Kennard vs. See Kennard vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, New Hampshire vs. See New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, New York Same as New Hampshire VS. Page vs. Louisiana. State of Louisiana, Treas'r of, Poydras vs. See Poydras vs. Treasurer of Louisiana. State of Maine vs. Newell. Sup. Ct. Maine, 1892; 84 Maine, 465, EMERY, J., Vol. II, State of Maryland, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Maryland. State of Maryland, McCulloch vs. See McCulloch vs. Maryland. State of Maryland, Smith vs. See Smith vs. State of Maryland. State of Maryland vs. Warren. See Maryland vs. Warren. State of Massachusetts, Manchester vs. See Manchester vs. Massachusetts. State of Massachusetts, Rhode Island vs. See Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. State of Massachusetts, Sheafe VS. See Commonwealth vs. Sheafe. VS. State of Massachusetts, Thurlow 229 230 Page Louisiana. See New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of New Hampshire, Pierce vs. See License Cases. State of New Jersey vs. Wilson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1812; 7 Cranch, 164, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, State of New Jersey, Brown vs. See Brown vs. New Jersey. State of New York vs. Dibble. See Cutler vs. Dibble. State of New York vs. Louisiana. Same as New Hampshire vs. Louisiana. State of New York (People of), Canal Appraisers vs. See Canal Appraisers vs. People. State of New York (People) vs. Conklin. See People (N. Y.) vs. Conklin. State of New York, People &c. vs. Curtis. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Curtis. State of New York, (People of,) vs. McLeod. See People (N. Y.) vs. McLeod. State of New York, People &c. vs. Stout. See People (N. Y.) &c., vs. Stout. State of New York, People of vs. Warren. See People (N. Y.) vs. Warren. State (North Dakota) ex rel. Tompton vs. Donoyer. Sup. Ct. N. Dak. 1897; 6 No. Dak. 586, BARTHOLOMEW, J., Vol. II, 230 214 State (Ohio) vs. Vanderpool. State of Oregon, Lane vs. See State of Penna. vs. Wheeling State of Penna., Bell's Gap R. R. Co. vs. See Bell's Gap R. R. State of Penna., Prigg vs. See Prigg vs. Pennsylvania. State of Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. See Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts. State of Rhode Island, Fletcher vs. See License Cases. State (So. Car.) vs. Smith. Ct. Appeals, So. Car. 1829; 1 Bailey, So. Car. Law. 283; 19 Am. Decisions, 679, JOHNSON, J., Vol. II, State of Tennessee, Coleman VS. See Coleman vs. Ten nessee. State of Tennessee vs. Davis. nessee. State of Tennessee, Van Brock- State of Texas, Asher vs. See Page State (Texas), Blandford vs. VS. New York Ct. of Errors, 1825; 3 Cowen, 713, SANDFORD Chan., Vol. I, Steamer Spark vs. Lee Choi Chum. U. S. Cir. Ct, Cal. 1 Sawyer, 713, Sawyer, J., Vol. II, Steamship &c. Companies. Compagnie Francaise vs. State Board of Health. Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico S. S. Co. Liverpool &c. Stm. Co. vs. Phoenix Ins. Co. Monongahela Nav. Co. vs. United 278 278 12 549 342 States. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. La. Board of Health. New Orleans vs. Steamship Co. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. vs. Hedden. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. vs. Magone. People vs. Compagnie Generale &c. Phila. & Sou. S. S. Co. vs. Pennsylvania. Steamboat Co vs. Livingstone. Thingvalla Line vs. United States. Page Stearns vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1867; 6 Wallace, 589, SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, 538 551, 554 Steele, Lawton vs. See Law ton vs. Steele. Steele Co. (Illinois), Budzisz Stephens vs. Cherokee Na- Sternaman vs. Peck. Stevens vs. Thatcher. Sup. Ct. Maine, 1897; 91 Maine, 70, EMERY, J., Vol. II, 34, 214 Stewart vs. Callaghan. U. S. Cir. Ct. Dist. of Col. 1835; 4 Cranch, C. C. 594, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Stimpson, Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. See Philadelphia & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. Stimpson. 298 141, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 547, 583 Stout, People N. Y. ex rel. 539 Young vs. See People (N. Y.) &c. vs. Stout, Strader vs. Graham. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1850; 10 Howard, 98, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, Strike Cases. See In re Debs. Strother vs. Lucas. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1832; 6 Peters, 763, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 538, 539 553, 554, 559 See United States vs. Stur- Sturges vs. Crowninshield. 549 U. S. Sup. Ct. 1870; 12 Wallace, 19, CLIFFORD, J., Vol. II, 74 Succession of Pargoud. See Pargoud, Succession of. Succession of Rabasse. See Rabasse, Succession of. United States vs. Sunol. Sulphur, D. & M. Co., Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. See Utah M. & Mfg. Co. vs. Dickert & M. Sulphur Co. Swan, The. U. S. Dist. Ct. Washington, 1892; 50 Fed. Rep. 108; HANDFORD, J., Vol. I, 537, 557 Swan, The James G., United Sup. Ct. 1795; Dallas, 133 U. S. 438, BREWER, Vol. I, Taltan vs. Mayes. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896; 163 U. S. 376, WHITE, J., Vol. I, Vol. II, 562 221, 231 Tamerling vs. U. S. Freehold and Emigration Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1876; 93 U. S. 644, DAVIS, J., Vol. II, Tampico Duty Case. See Fleming vs. Page. 185 34 Taylor vs. Brown. U. S. Sup. Tax Cases. See License Tax See Shep ard vs. Taylor. Tennessee vs. Davis. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1879; 100 U..S. 257, STRONG, J., Vol. I, 537, 543, 551 556, 557 Coleman vs. See Tennessee, Coleman vs. Tennessee. Tennessee, Henderson vs. See Territory of Arizona, Marsh vs. Ct. 1868; 7 Wallace, 700, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 250, 537 541, 543, 557 Texas, State of, Asher vs. See Asher vs. Texas. 549 124 Texas, State of, Blandford vs. See Blandford vs. State. Texas, United States vs. See Page United States vs. Texas (2 Thatcher, Stevens VS. See 219 VS. See Boyd vs. Nebraska. Thebo vs. Choctaw Tribe of Indians. U. S. Cir. Ct. Appeals, 8th Cir. 1895; 66 Fed. Rep. 372, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, Thingvalla Line vs. United States. U. S. Ct. Claims, 1889; 24 Ct. Clms. 255, RICHARDSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, 77, 301 Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar vs. Boyle. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 191, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 498, 551 557 Thomas vs. Gay. U. S. Sup. 539, 547 86, 221 Thomas vs. United States. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1874; 12 See Thomas, Springville vs. See Springville vs. Thomas. Bales of Cotton. See Am. Thurlow vs. Massachusetts. See Tiburcio Parrott, In re. See Parrott, In re Tiburcio. Tillman, Cantini vs. See Cantini vs. Tillman. Tingy, Bas vs. See Bas vs. Tingy. Titusville, Brennan vs. See Brennan vs. Titusville. Tobacco Factory, United States VS. See United States vs. Tobacco Factory. Tobin vs. Wilkinshaw (three cases). U. S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1855 and 1856; 1 McAllister, 26, 151, 186; Fed. Cas. 14,068-69-70, MCALLISTER, J., Vol. II, Tompkins, Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. See Chicago, Mil. &c. R. R. Co. vs. Tompkins. Tompton, State &c. vs. Donoyer. See State (Nor. Dak.) vs. Donoyer. Tom Yum, In re. U S. Dist. Ct. Cala. 1894; 64 Fed. Rep. 485, MORROW, J., Vol. II, Toombs, Hornbuckle vs. See Hornbuckle vs. Toombs. Topeka, Loan Ass'n vs. See Loan Ass'n vs. Topeka. Tory Rent Case. See Rutgers vs. Waddington. Page 179 119 Town vs. De Haven. U. S. |