Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Prigg vs. Pennsylvania (Fug-
itive Slave law). U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1842; 16 Peters, 539,
STORY, J., Vol. I, 536, 541, 543
Prize Cases, The. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1862; 2 Black, 635, GRIER, J., Vol. II, 124, 126 Propagation of the Gospel,

Society for. See Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. Provincial Fisheries, In re. Sup. Ct. Canada, 1895; 26 Can. Sup. Ct. 444, SIR HENRY STRONG, TASCHEREAU, GWYNNE, GIROUARD, JJ.

Vol. II,

Quah, Sah, case of. See Sah

Quah's case. Quarantine Cases. Compagnie Francaise vs. State Board of Health. Minn. & St. P. R. R. Co. vs. Milner. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. Board of Health, La. People vs. Compagnie Generale.

Quarles, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct.

320

1895; 158 U. S. 532, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 537, 551 Queue, The Chinese Case. See Ho-Ah-Kow vs. Nunan.

Quimby, United States vs.

United States vs. Quimby.

See

Quock Ting vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 140 U. S.
417, FIELD, J., Vol. II,
Quong Woo, In re. See United
States vs. Quong Woo.
Quong Woo, United States vs.
See United States vs. Quong
Woo.

[blocks in formation]

1897, 49 La. Ann. 1405,

113

163 U. S. 504, WHITE, J., Vol. II, 33, 34, 63, 86, 130,132 133, 134, 214 Race Horse, Ward vs. See Ward vs. Race Horse. Radford, Craig vs. See Craig

vs. Radford.
Rahrer, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct.

1891; 140 U. S. 545, FULLER,
Ch. J., Vol. II,
Rahtjen's &c. Co., Holzapfel's
&c. Co. vs. See Holzapfel's
&c. Co. vs. Rahtjen's &c. Co.
Railroad Co., Dennick vs. See
Dennick vs. R. R. Co.
Railroad Companies. See Bell
vs. Atl. & Pac. R. R. Co.
Bell's Gap R. R. Co. VS.
Pennsylvania. Buffalo R. &
P. R. R. Co. vs. Lavery.
Buttz vs. Northern Pacific R.
R. Co. Capital Traction Co.
vs. Hof. Cherokee Nation vs.
Southern Kansas Ry. Co.
Chicago, Milwaukee &c. R.
R. Co. vs. Tompkins. Chicago,
Rock Island and Pac. R. R.
Co. vs. McGlinn. Dennick vs.
R. R. Co. Fort Leavenworth
R. R. Co. vs. Lowe. Herman
vs. New Orleans R. R. Co.
Hubgh vs. New Orleans R. R.
Co. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co.
vs. Illinois. Leavenworth &c.
R. R. Co. vs. United States.
Metropolitan R. R. Co. vs.
Dist. of Col. Minn. & St. P.
R. R. vs. Milner. Missouri,
K. & T. R. R. Co. vs. Roberts.
Missouri, K. & T. R R. Co. vs.
United States. Phila. &
Reading R. R. Co. vs. Ken-
ney. Phila. & Trenton R. R.
Co. vs. Stimpson. Pittsburgh
& Southern Coal Co. vs. Bates.
St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. VS.
Phelps. Stroud vs. Missouri
River R. R. Co. United
States vs. Joint Traffic Assn.
United States vs. Union Pa-
cific Ry. Co. Utah & Nor.
R. R. Co. vs. Fisher.
Ramsey, Murphy vs.
phy vs. Ramsey.

See Mur

NICHOLLS, Ch. J., Vol. II, 53, 55 | Rauscher, United States

Race Horse, In re. U.S. Cir.

Ct. Wyoming, 1895; 70 Fed.
Rep. 598, RINER, J., reversed
sub nomine Ward vs. Race
Horse. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896;

VS.

See United States vs. Rauscher. Ravesies vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. Alabama, 1889; 37 Fed. Rep. 447, PARDEE, J.,

51

Vol. I,

Page

548

Raymond vs. Thomas. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1875; 91 U. S. 712,
SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, 500, 551
Real Estate Co., Beck vs. See
Flournoy &c. Co. vs. Beck.
Realty Co., United States vs.
See United States vs. Realty
Co.

Reeder, Crane vs. See Crane
vs. Reeder.

Reid, Webster vs. See Web-
ster vs. Reid.
Reilly, Roberts vs.
erts vs. Reilly.

Reinitz, In re.

See Rob

U. S. Cir. Ct.

S. D. N. Y. 1889; 39 Fed.
Rep. 204, BROWN, J., Vol.
II,
266, 275
Rent (Tory) Case. See Rutgers

vs. Waddington.
Repentigny, United States vs.
See United States vs. Repen-
timmy.
Republic Francaise, La vs.
Schultz. U. S. Cir. Ct. S. D.
N. Y. 1893; 57 Fed. Rep. 37,
TOWNSEND, J., Vol. II,
Republic of Hawaii, Lewis vs.
See Lewis vs. Hawaii.
Republic of Hawaii, Peacock

vs. See Peacock vs. Hawaii,
&c.

328

189

Respublica VS. De Long-
champs. Oyer & Terminer,
Phila., 1784; 1 Dallas, 111,
MCKEAN, J., Vol. II,
Respublica vs. Gordon. Sup.
Ct. Penna. 1788; 1 Dallas,
252, MCKEAN, Ch. J., Vol.
II,
Respublica vs. Sweers. Sup.
Ct. Penna. 1779; 1 Dallas,
45, MCKEAN, Ch. J., Vol. I, 537
543

Page

Rhodes vs. Iowa. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1898; 170 U. S. 412,
WHITE, J., Vol. I,
547, 548
Rhodes, United States vs. See
United States vs. Rhodes.
Rice, United States vs. See
United States vs. Rice.
Richter vs. Reynolds. U. S.
Cir. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1893;
17 U. S. App. 427, DALLAS,
J., Vol. II,
Ridgway vs. Hays. U. S. Cir.
Ct. Dist. of Col. 1836; 5
Cranch, 23, CRANCH, Ch. J.,
Vol. II,

Riggs, Geofroy vs. See Geofroy
vs. Riggs.

Rio Arriba L. & C. Co. vs.
United States. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1897; 167 U. S. 298, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. II,

Rio Grande Dam &c. Co., Uni-
ted States vs. See United
States vs. Rio Grande Dam
&c. Co.

Risch, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct.

Texas, 1888; 36 Fed. Rep.
546, SABIN, J., Vol. II,
Ritchie, United States vs. See
United States vs. Ritchie.
Rixner's Succession. Sup.
Ct. Louis'a, 1896; 48 L. Ann.
552, WATKINS, J., Vol. II,
Robbins vs. Shelby Taxing
District. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1887; 120 U. S. 489, BRAD-
LEY, J., Vol. I,
Roberts vs. Reilly. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1885; 116 U. S. 80, MAT-
THEWS, J., Vol. I.,

46, 79, 83 Roberts vs. United States.

[blocks in formation]

U. S. Ct. Claims, 1 Devereux,
31, BLACKFORD, J., Vol. II,
Roberts, Missouri, K. & T. R. R.
Co. vs. See Missouri, K. & T.
R. R. Co. vs. Roberts.
Roberts, Standley vs. See Stand-
ley vs. Roberts.

Robertson vs. Baldwin. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1897; 165 U. S. 275,
BROWN, J., Vol. I,
Robertson, Bartram VS. See
Bartram vs. Robertson.
Robertson, Edye vs. See Edye
vs. Robertson or Head Money
Cases.
Robertson, Netherclift VS.
See Netherclift vs. Robertson.
Robertson, Whitney vs. See
Whitney vs. Robertson.

327

298

181

266

54

547

539

298

541

Page

Page

Robins (Nash alias), United States vs. See United States

vs. Nash (alias Robins).

Robinson vs. Caldwell.

U. S.

Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1895;
29 U. S. App. 468, GIL-
BERT, J., Vol. II,

Robouam's Heirs vs. Robo-
uam's Exrs. Sup. Ct.
Louisiana, 1838; 12 La. (0.
S.) 73, MARTIN, J., Vol. II,
Rochester, Blight VS. See
Blight vs. Rochester.
Rodgers, United States vs. See
United States vs. Rodgers
(two cases).

Rodriguez, In re. U. S. Dist.

Ct. Texas, 1897; 81 Fed. Rep. 337, MAXEY, J., Vol. II, 'Rogers, United States vs. See United States vs. Rogers. Roland, Ladiga vs. See Ladiga vs. Roland.

Ropes vs. Clinch. U. S. Cir.

Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1871; 8 Blatchford, 304; Fed. Cas. 12,041, WOODRUFF, J., Vol. II, Rose vs. Himeley. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1808; 4 Cranch, 241, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

207

54

83

74

537, 544 551, 552 358, 361

See

Rose, United States vs.
United States vs. Rose.
Roselius, United States vs. See
United States vs. Roselius.
Ross vs. Eells. U. S. Cir. Ct.
Washington, 1893; 56 Fed.
Rep. 855, HANDFORD, J.,
Vol. II,
Ross vs. United States. U.S.
Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29 Ct. of
Clms. 176, RICHARDSON, Ch.
J.

Ross, Bauman vs. See Bauman vs. Ross.

Ross, Eells vs. See Eells vs. Ross.

Ross, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.

Ct. Ohio, 1869; 2 Bond, 252;
Fed. Cas. 12,069, LEAVITT, J.,
Vol. II,

Ross, In re.

225

267

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 140 U. S. 453, FIELD, J., Vol. 1, 54, 537, 541, 545, 552 553, 556, 557, 559, 560 64, 139, 140, 238, 333 335, 345, 346 U. S. Dist. Ct. 1883; 15 Fed.

Vol. II,

Roth, In re. S. D. N. Y.

Rep. 506, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 267 Roulet, Alexander vs. See Al

exander vs. Roulet.

Roulet, New York Ins. Co. vs.

See New York Ins. Co. vs.
Roulet.

Rowe, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct.
8th Cir. Ct. 1896; 77 Fed. Rep.
161, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, 267
Ruiz, Ornelas vs. See Ornelas
vs. Ruiz.

Russian Deserter Case. See United States, &c., vs. Alexandroff.

Rutgers

VS. Waddington

(Tory Rent Case). Mayor's Ct. N. Y. City, 1784; Vol. II, 36 Sah Quah's Case. U. S. Dist.

Ct. Alaska, 1886; 31 Fed. Rep. 327, DAWSON, J., Vol, I, 554 556, 557, 559, 562 166, 168, 235

Vol. II,

Sailors Snug Harbor, Inglis vs.
See Inglis vs. Sailors Snug
Harbor.

St. Oloff, The. U. S. Dist.

Ct. 1790; 2 Peters Adm. Rep.
428, PETERS, J., Vol. II, 330, 331
St. Oloff, Weiburg vs. See
Weiburg vs. St. Oloff.
St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. VS.
Phelps. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1890; 137 U. S. 528, LAMAR,
J., Vol. II,

Salamoni, Feol vs. See Feol vs.
Salamoni.

Sala's Succession. Sup. Ct.
Louisiana, 1898; 50 La. Ann.

1009, NICHOLLS, Ch. J.,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Page

284

Jugiro, In re Shibuya.
Ship Apollo, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of
Clms. 411, PEELLE, J., Vol.
II,
Ship Betsey, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1888; 23 Ct. of
Clms. 277, NOTT, J., Vol. II, 284
Ship Concord, The. U. S. Ct.

of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of
Clms. 432, NOTT, Ch. J.,
Vol. II,
Ship Ganges, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1896; 31 Ct. of
Clms., 17, DAVIS, J., Vol.
II,
Ship Jane, The. U. S. Ct. of
Claims, 1889; 24 Ct. of Clms.
74, NOTT, J., Vol. II,
Ship Juliana, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of
Clms. 400, PEELLE, J., Vol.
II,
Ship Parkman, The. U. S. Ct.
of Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of
Clms. 406, WELDON, J., Vol.
II,
Ship Richmond vs. United
States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815;
9 Cranch, 102, MARSHALL,
Ch. J., Vol. II,
Ship Star, The. U. S. Ct. of
Claims, 1900; 35 Ct. of
Cims. 387, WELDON, J., Vol.
II,
Ship Tom, The. U. S. Ct. of
Claims, 1893; 29 Ct. of
Clms., 68, NOTT, J., Vol.
II,

Ships, names of. See Vessels,

[blocks in formation]

284

284

284

284

284

278

284

284

[blocks in formation]

Silver Bow Co., Talbot vs. See
Talbot vs. Silver Bow Co.
Slaughterhouse Cases. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1872; 16 Wallace, 36,
MILLER, J., Vol. I, 53, 62, 537
541, 543, 550, 556, 557, 583
Vol. II,
1, 56, 57, 58, 59
Slidell vs. Grandjean. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1883; 111 U. S. 412,
FIELD, J., Vol. II,
Sloop Betsey, Glass, vs. The.
See Glass vs. The Sloop
Betsey.

179

Smith vs. State of Maryland.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1810; 6 Cranch,
286, WASHINGTON, J., Vol. I, 557
Vol. II,

16, 318
Smith vs. Turner (Passen-
ger cases). U. S. Sup. Ct.
1849; 7 Howard, 283, Vol. II, 51
Smith (Famous) vs. United

States. See Famous Smith
vs. United States.

Smith, State (So. Car.) vs.
See State So. Car. vs. Smith.
Smith, Thorington vs. See Thor-
ington vs. Smith.

vs.

12

Snow vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1873; 18 Wallace, 317, BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, 539 Snug Harbor, Sailors', Inglis See Inglis vs. Sailors' Snug Harbor. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Hartland. U. S. Cir. Ct. 1814; 2 Payne, 536; Fed. Cas. 13155, THOMPSON, J., Vol. II, Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Pawlett. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 4 Peters, 480, STORY, J., Vol. II, Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Town of New Haven. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1823; 8 Wheaton, 464, WASHINGTON, J., Vol. II, 12, 131, 146 78 Society for the Propagation of the Gospel vs. Wheeler. U. S. Cir. Ct. New Hampshire, 1814; 2 Matthews, 105; Fed. Cas. 13156, STORY, J., Vol. II,

118, 129, 538
539, 541
159, 314

U. S.

Dist. Ct. Cala. 1884; 10 Saw-
yer, 268, HOFFMAN, J.,
Vol. II,

Short vs. Deacon. Sup. Ct.
Penna. 1823; 10 Sarg. &
Rawle, 125, TILGHMAN, Ch.
J., Vol. II,
Shoup, Opel vs. See Opel vs.
Shoup.

Sibbald, United States vs. See
United States vs. Sibbald.
Siebold, Ex parte. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1879; 100 U. S. 371,

270

[blocks in formation]

12

12

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »