 We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large...  The Law Students' Magazine - Halaman 2091854Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 halaman
...in Horncr v. Graves, 7 Bing. 735, and uniformly adopted in subsequent cases, is this : to consider whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 halaman
...be overruled. But with respect to what is reasonable, Tindal, CJ, there lays down the rule thus : " We do not see how a better test can be applied to...considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford & fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 halaman
...discussed in the case of Homer v. Graves (e) ; where the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas observed (g), " We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether rea(a) ST. RI 18. (6) 3 Bing. 323. (c) 1 PW 181. (d) 2 Chit. 407. («) 7 Bing. 735. fe) P. 7*3. sonable... | |
 | 1843 - 564 halaman
...reasonable. The words of Chief Justice Tiudal, in Homer v. Graves, (7 Bing. 743), may be safely adopted : ' We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question, whether this is or is not a reasonable restraint of trade, than by considering whether the restraint is such... | |
 | 1846 - 528 halaman
...reasonable. The language of Tindal, CJ, in Horner v. Greaves1, is characteristically sagacious: — " We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether this is or is not a reasonable restraint of trade, than by considering whether the restraint is such... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900 - 840 halaman
...reasonableness in such contracts was stated by Tindal, CJ, in Homer v. Graves, 7 Bing. 735, as follows : "We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether the agreement is reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford... | |
 | John William Smith, John Innes Clark Hare, Horace Binney Wallace, John William Wallace - 1855 - 1006 halaman
...agreement must be reasonable. " We do not see, (says Tindal, CJ, in Horner v. Graves, 7 Bingh. 743,) how a better test can be applied to the question,...a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1860 - 622 halaman
...within which the restraint would be reasonable, and beyond which, excessive. But " a better test cannot be applied to the question whether reasonable or not,...considering whether the restraint is such only as to aftbrd a fuir protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large... | |
 | 1863 - 620 halaman
...means of locomotion, and the mode of conducting business. The true test is, whether the restraint was such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the purchasers, and not so largo as to interfere with the interests of the public. They cited, Wallw v.... | |
 | Charles Davidson - 1864 - 638 halaman
...restraint, has given rise to much litigation. The test to be applied is, whether the restriction imposed is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in whose favour it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
| |
