Tharp vs. Witham (65 Ia., 556), 63. United States vs. Collins (1 Woods (U. S.), 499, 504), 65. United States vs. Union Pac. R. Co. (105 U. S., 263), 74. Venine vs. Archibald (3 Colo., 163), 62 Wheeler vs. State (42 Ga., 306), 65 Williams vs. Davis (46 Ill. App., 228), 46. Z'aleski vs. Clark (45 Conn., 401), 69. Zeller vs. Eckert (3 Howard, 289), 72. CASES CITED IN THIRTY-FIFTH SUBJECT-CODE Bulkley vs. Staats (31 Hun. (N. Y.), 137), 80. Hayden vs. McCloskey (161 Ill., 351), 83. Phillips vs. Gorham (17 N. Y., 270), 83. Triplett vs. Scott (12 Ill., 137), 80. CASES CITED IN THIRTY-SIXTH SUBJECT-FEDERAL Alexander vs. United States (15 U. S. App., 158), 128. Amer. Bible Soc. vs. Grove (101 U. S., 610), 125. Amer. Bible Soc. vs. Price (110 U. S., 61), 125. American Const. Co. vs. Jacksonville, etc. Ry. Co. (148 U. S., 372), 128. American Sugar Refining Co. vs. Johnson (13 U. S., App. 681), 130. Atkins vs. Disintegrating Co. (18 Wallace, 272), 123. Aztec Mining Co. vs. Ripley (10 U. S. App., 383), 128. Bacon vs. State of Texas (163 U. S., 207), 131. Barlow vs. United States (7 Peters, 404), 105. Barney vs. Lathan (103 U. S., 205), 124. Bevian vs. Chetwood (9 Fed. Rep., 678), 124. Bigelow vs. Nickerson (34 U. S. App., 261). Bissell Carpet Co. vs. Goshen Sweeper Co. (43 U. S. App., 47), 129. Boom Co. vs. Patterson (98 U. S., 403), 124. Brown vs. Smith (88 Fed. Rep., 565), 116. Cabot vs. McMaster (61 Fed. Rep., 129), 115. California Oil, etc., Co. vs. Miller (96 Fed. Rep., 22), 118. Cambria Iron Co. vs. Ashburn (118 U. S., 54), 125. Carson vs. Dunham (121 U. S., 421), 131. Central Nat. Bank vs. Stevens (169 U. S., 432), 115 Central Trust Co. vs. Smith Atlantic & O. R. Co. (57 Fed. Rep., 536), 115. Chappell vs. Waterworth (155 U. S., 102), 123. Choteau vs. Marquents (12 Peters, 507), 131. Citizens Bank vs. Cannon (164 U. S., 319), 115. City of Bellaire vs. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. (156 U. S., 117), 124. Claffin vs. McDermott (12 Fed. Rep., 375), 124. Cohens vs. Virginia (6 Wheaton, 264), 123. Columbus Watch Co. vs. Robbins (148 U. S., 266), 128. Corfield vs. Coryell (4 Wash., C. C., 371), 105. Cornelas vs. Ruiz (161 U. S., 502), 130. Cornell vs. Green (163 U. S., 75), 130. Crawford vs. Johnson (1 Deady, (6 Fed. Cas., No. 3), 369), 117. Davis vs. Life Association of America (11 Fed. Rep., 781), 115. Donnick vs. Railroad Co. (103 U. S., 11), 115. Dower vs. Richards (151 U. S., 658), 128. Ducan vs. United States (7 Peters, 450), 105. Dwight vs. Central Vt. R. Co. (20 Blatchf., 200), 115. Erwin vs. Lowery (7 Howard, 172), 115. Fern vs. Holme (21 How., 481), 133. Fishback vs. Western Union Tel. Co. (161 U. S., 96), 115. Fisk vs. Henaire (142 U. S., 459), 125. Forsyth vs. Hammond (166 U. S., 506), 128. Fox vs. Ohio (5 Howard, 410), 105. Gaines vs. Fuentes (92 U. S., 10), 124. Gelston vs. Hoyt (3 Wheaton, 246), 105. Gold Washing and W. Co. vs. Keyes (96 U. S., 199), 123. Gonzales vs. Cunningham (164 U. S., 612), 130. Gibson vs. Mississippi (162 U. S., 565), 126. Gibson vs. Peters (150 U. S., 342), 116. Hanrick vs. Hanrick (153 U. S., 192), 125. Henry vs. Sawles, (Dist. Ct. Vt. (28 Fed. Rep., 481), 105. Hill vs. Blascow R. Co. (41 Fed. Rep., 610), 115. Holden vs. Utah & M. M. Co. (82 Fed. Rep., 209), 115. Holt vs. Bergevin (60 Fed. Rep., 1), 115. Holt vs. Indiana Mfg. Co. (176 U. S., 68), 118. Hubbard vs. Soby (146 U. S., 56), 128. Hunt vs. United States (166 U. S., 424), 128. Ins. Co. vs. Ritchie (5 Wallace, 541), 126. International Bank of St. Louis vs. Faber (79 Fed. Rep., 919), 115. Jefferson vs. Driver (117 U. S., 272), 125. Johnson vs. Jumel (3 Woods, 69), 13 Fed. Cas., No. 7, 392), 117. Kanouse vs. Martin (15 Howard, 198), 115, 123. Lees vs. United States (150 U. S., 476), 105, 114. Maiden vs. Campbell Press and Mfg. Co. (38 U. S. App., 123), 129. Mason vs. Pewagic Min. Co. (153 U. S., 361), 130. Maynard vs. Hecht (151 U. S., 324), 130 McKenna vs. Simpson (129 U. S., 506), 131. McLeed vs. Graven (47 U. S. App., 573), 129. Mexican National Railroad Co. vs. Davidson (157 U. S., 201), 123. Nashua and L. R. Corp. vs. Boston and Lan. R. Corp. (5 U. S. App., 97), 130 Neale vs. Foster (31 Fed. Rep., 55), 125. Nebraska vs. Lockwood (3 Wallace, 236), 118. New Orleans vs. DeArmos (9 Peters, 224), 131. Paine vs. Hook (7 Wallace, 426), 115. Panama Ry. Co. vs. Napier Shipping Co. (166 U. S., 280), 128. People vs. Rock Island & P. Ry. Co. (71 Fed. Rep., 753), 123. Peyton vs. Bliss (1 Wall., 170), 125. Philadelphia vs. Collector (5 Wallace, 720), 126. Platt vs. Beach (2 Ben., 303), 105. Pointer vs. United States (151 U. S., S. 396), 134. Pollard vs. Dwight (4 Cranch, 421), 104. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. vs. State of Alabama (155 U. S., 482) 124. Potts vs. Chumasero (92 U. S., 358), 130. Press Pub. Co. vs. Monroe (164 U. S., 105), 128. Railway Co. vs. Whitton (13 Wallace, 270), 124. Rouse vs. Letcher (156 U. S., 47), 128. Rust vs. United Waterworks Co. (36 I. S. App., 167), 130. be pending in said courts on appeal from the District Courts. Promulgated March 30, 1881. 103 U. S. XIII. (59) In a suit for damage by collision, if the claimant of any vessel proceeded against, or any respondent proceeded against in personam, shall, by petition, on oath, presented before or at the time of answering the libel, or within such further time as the court may allow, and containing suitable allegations showing fault or negligence in any other vessel contributing to the same collision, and the particulars thereof, and that such other vessel or any other party ought to be proceeded against in the same suit for such damage, pray that process be issued against such vessel or party to that end, such process may be issued, and if duly served, such suit shall proceed as if such vessel or party had been originally proceeded against; the other parties in the suit shall answer the petition; the claimant of such vessel or such new party shall answer the libel; and such further proceedings shall be had and decree rendered by the court in the suit as to law and justice shall appertain. But every such petitioner shall upon filing his petition, give a stipulation, with sufficient sureties, to pay to the libellant and to any claimant or new party brought in by virtue of such process, all such costs, damages, and expenses as shall be awarded against the petitioner by the court upon the final decree, whether rendered in the original or appellate court; and any such claimant or new party shall give the same bonds or stipulations which are required in like cases from parties brought in under process issued on the prayer of a libellant. Promulgated March 26, 1883. 112 U. S. 743. and against all persons lawfully intervening for their interest therein, in case of... ....civil and maritime. And thereupon, the said libelant.. do.. allege and articulately propound as follows, to wit: FIRST. THAT your libelant.. at the time of the. the owner.. and proprietor.. of. said.... .hereinafter mentioned. .which . is a vessel of more than Twenty Tons Burden, and at the time when the. ....hereinafter stated and set forth arose, was enrolled and licensed for the coasting trade, and employed in the business of commerce and navigation between ports and places in different States and Territories of the United States, upon the lakes and navigable waters connecting said lakes. SECOND. THAT the said.... .now lying at ..in the District aforesaid, is a vessel of more than Twenty Tons Burden, and at the time when the cause of action hereinafter stated and set forth arose, was enrolled and licensed for the coasting trade, and employed in the business of commerce and navigation between ports and places in different States and Territories of the United States, upon the lakes and navigable waters connecting said lakes. |