Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice
There is no unified theory that can explain both voter choice and where choices come from. Hinich and Munger fill that gap with their model of political communication based on ideology.
Rather than beginning with voters and diffuse, atomistic preferences, Hinich and Munger explore why large groups of voters share preference profiles, why they consider themselves "liberals" or "conservatives." The reasons, they argue, lie in the twin problems of communication and commitment that politicians face. Voters, overloaded with information, ignore specific platform positions. Parties and candidates therefore communicate through simple statements of goals, analogies, and by invoking political symbols. But politicians must also commit to pursuing the actions implied by these analogies and symbols. Commitment requires that ideologies be used consistently, particularly when it is not in the party's short-run interest.
The model Hinich and Munger develop accounts for the choices of voters, the goals of politicians, and the interests of contributors. It is an important addition to political science and essential reading for all in that discipline.
"Hinich and Munger's study of ideology and the theory of political choice is a pioneering effort to integrate ideology into formal political theory. It is a major step in directing attention toward the way in which ideology influences the nature of political choices." --Douglass C. North
". . . represents a significant contribution to the literature on elections, voting behavior, and social choice." --Policy Currents
Melvin Hinich is Professor of Government, University of Texas. Michael C. Munger is Associate Professor of Political Science, University of North Carolina.
Apa yang dikatakan orang - Tulis resensi
Kami tak menemukan resensi di tempat biasanya.
Ideology and Politics
Representing Choice by Consumers and Citizens
The Amended Classical Spatial Theory of Elections
Ideology Candidate Strategy and the Theory of Elections
Parties and Ideology
Theory and Evidence on Spatial Models of Ideology
Empirical Models Based on the Theory of Ideology
Representing Public Choices by Citizens
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
actions actual allows analysis answer approach assume assumption behavior believe campaign candidates chapter choose citizens claim classical commitment competition complex concept consider consistent cost create decision defined definition derived determined dimension discussed distribution Downs economic effect election electoral empirical Enelow equation equilibrium established example exist expected fact factor follows formal function given groups Hinich ideal points ideas ideological positions ideology implies important individual interest issues least linkage means median notes once organization origin outcomes particular party perceptions perspective platform political choice positions possible predictive preferences present principle probability problem question rational reason relation represent rule shared simple social society space spatial model spatial theory spending status quo strategy theoretical theory Theta tion uncertainty understanding utility variable variance voters voting