no instance, it is believed, has the meaning been obscured. Where the Supreme Court has been spoken of, without other qualification, the highest federal tribunal has been meant. Dealing as this volume does with the principles or philosophy of our constitutional system, it is hoped that it will be found not only interesting to the general reader but serviceable as a text-book for academic classes beginning the study of the public law and political practice of our country. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, Baltimore, Maryland, July, 1904. W. W. W. CASES CITED Ableman v. Booth (21 How., 506), 59, 65, 169 Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor (165 U. S., 194), 129 Alexander's, Mrs., Cotton (2 American Insurance Co. v. Canter (1 Pet., 511), 194, 206, 213, 258 Andrews v. Andrews (188 Antoni v. Greenhow (107 U. S., 769), 177 Atherton v. Atherton (181 Barron v. Baltimore (7 Pet., Barron v. Burnside (121 U. S., 186), 172 Bell v. Bell (181 U. S., 175), 276 Benner v. Porter (9 How., 235), 209 Blake v. McClung (172 U. S., 239), 281, 283 Board of Liquidation v. McComb (92 U. S., 531), 178 Bolln v. Nebraska (176 U. S., 83), 267 Boyd v. Thayer (143 U. S., 135), 258 Briscoe v. Bank of Kentucky 11 Pet., 257), 56, 130 Brown v. Houston (114 U. S., 622), 139 Brown v. Maryland (12 Wh., 419), 126 Cardwell V. American River Bridge Co. (113 U. S., 205), 138 Carleton v. Rugg (149 Mass., 550), 189 Chappell v. United States (160 U. S., 499), 131 Charles River Bridge Co. v. Warren Bridge Co. (11 Pet., 420), 57 Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (5 Chinese Exclusion Cases (130 Chirac v. Chirac (2 Wh., 259), 138 Chisholm v. Georgia (2 Dall., 419), 37, 289 City of New York v. Miln (11 Pet., 102), 57 Civil Rights Cases (109 U. S., 3), 182, 184 Clinton v. Englebrecht (13 Wall., 434), 205 264), 48, 50, 51, 164 Collector v. Day (11 Wall., 113), 130 Cooley v. Board of Wardens (12 How., 300), 138 Corfield v. Coryell (4 Wash., C. C., 371), 279 Craig v. Missouri (4 Pet., 410), 52 |