The sale of land after final proof, but prior to the issuance of final certificate, will not defeat the right to a patent, where the record shows due compliance with law..... 366 The sale of land shortly after making proof and the issuance of final certificate does not warrant a presumption against the good faith of the entryman
The issuance of a final certificate on a purchase of timber land under the act of June 3, 1878, does not deprive the Depart- ment of jurisdiction to inquire into tho character of such entry; and a purchaser of the lands so entered, prior to the issu- ance of patent, takes the lands subject to the final action of the Department.......
Notice of departmental decision should be given a mortgagee where the Department is aware of such interest, and the right of a mortgagee to be heard in defense of the entry is not defeated by a judgment of can- cellation in the absence of such notice.....
Amendment
See Entry.
Appeal.
See Practice.
For the purpose of securing an order to take testimony by deposition and a con- tinuance until said testimony is taken and returned is general, and confers jurisdiction on the local office.
A party may not plead a special, where the record discloses a previous general ap- pearance without limitation as to the pur- pose thereof.......
At a hearing without objection to the notice waives any defect therein...... Application.
To enter, to be valid, must be made at a time when the land is free from appropria tion, and legally subject to entry
An entry based upon an application and preliminary affidavit executed while the land is not subject to disposal is invalid, and the defect can not be cured in the presence of an intervening adverse claim...
To enter, presented while the land in question is involved in the pending applica tion of another, should be held to await the final disposition of the prior application.148, 592 To enter should not be allowed for land included within a pre-emption claim under which notice of intention to submit final proof has been published
To enter, made within three months from settlement, is not required to protect such settlement as against the intervening entry of another, if the settler initiates a contest against said entry, alleging his own priority, within three months after the land becomes subject to entry.
Omission of the records in the local office to show, may be supplied by affidavits..... 53 Corroborated affidavits showing the filing of, may be accepted as conclusive, where the records do not disclose the fact of such filing, nor tend to contradict the showing made by the applicant...............
To select, filed by a State when the lands are not subject thereto confers no right.... 417 Failure to appeal from the rejection of an application to file a declaratory statement defeats all rights that might have been secured thereunder, and such failure is not excused by the fact that the title to the land was erroneously believed to not be in the United States. (See 16 L. D., 368.) ...... 494
To enter filed with a contest prior to the repeal of the timber-culture law saves the right of the applicant to perfect his entry after said repeal if the entry under contest is finally canceled.......... ....53, 279
A successful timber-culture contestant who files, with his contest, has no right that is protected from the operation of the subse- quent repeal of the timber-culture law if he fails to exercise his right within the statu- tory period......
The repeal of the timber-culture law prior to the receipt at the local office of defeats the right of entry. The delay of the appli cation in the mails, by reason of a "storm and washout," does not relieve the applicant from the effect of the repeal..
Approximation.
See Entry, Railroad Lands.
Arid Lands.
See Reservoir.
Delay in the issuance of final, will not de- feat the rights of one who has duly com. plied with the law
Issue of final, on timber-land purchase does not deprive the Department of juris. diction to inquire into the character of such entry....
Certiorari.
See Practice, sub title Review.
An application for writ of, will not be granted where it is apparent therefrom that the appeal asked for would be dismissed if before the Department.. 298
Cherokee Outlet.
See circular of September 1, 1893, with the President's proclamation opening lands to entry.. Circulars.
See Tables of, page XVII. Coal Land.
A private entry of, may not be allowed to embrace one tract, taken in the capacity of an assignee, and another under the individ- ual right of the purchaser...
An entry embracing land not included in the declaratory statement, but necessary to the working of the mine and not in excess of the legal acreage, may be allowed to stand where good faith on the part of the entrymu is manifest...
No vested rights are secured through filing a declaratory statement; and a sale of the land thereafter by the claimant, prior to final proof and entry, defeats his right to pur- chase said land, and an entry thereof made in his name must be canceled..
An application by an agent of an associa tion to file a coal declaratory statement must be made in the manner provided by the departmental regulations, and show what improvements have been made, and the qualifications of the persons composing the association................
Commutation.
See Entry, Oklahoma Lands. Confirmation.
SECTION 7, ACT OF MARCH 3, 1891. In applying the confirmatory provisions of, an intervening entry should not be can-
An entry that is fraudulent in its incep tion, and is transferred prior to March 1, 1888, is not confirmed where at the date of said transfer the entry is under attack as shown by the records of the local office.... 277 A transferee, who employs another to pro- cure title to a tract, does not occupy the status of a bona fide purchaser, if the agent secures such title through an entry made in the interest of the transferee, even though the transferee had no knowledge of the fraud
A bona fide purchaser of the land cov ered by an entry who subsequently sells a portion of the land embraced therein, and then joins in the release to the United States of all title held under said entry, except as to one tract, may properly invoke the con- firmatory provisions of section 7 as to said tract
The confirmation of an entry under the body of section 7 is not defeated by a claim based on the alleged prior occupancy of the land by a non-reservation Indian, where at the date of said entry there was no author- ity for such occupancy ................
A desert-land entry of double minimum land allowed at single minimum is con- firmed under the body of the section, if otherwise within the terms of the statute. (See 16 L. D., 407.)..
The confirmatory provisions of the body of the section extend to an entry made by a min if such entry is otherwise within the terms of said section.
A deed executed prior to March 1, 1888,'in the name of and purporting to convey the in- terest and title of one holding a power of at- torney from another in whose name a sol- diers' additional entry has been made by such attorney in fact, is not proof of a sale of the land that brings the entry within the confirmatory provisions of section 7; nor will a deed executed subsequently by the principal and based on an additional consid- eration operate to cure the defects in the former conveyance so as to bring said entry within the terms of said section....
A purchaser of the land covered by a sol- diers' additional entry made under a power of attorney that is in effect a transfer of the soldier's right prior to the exercise theeof is not entitled to confirmation.....
The act of March 3, 1893, conferring the right of purchase upon transferees holding
A soldier's additional homestead entry based on an invalid certificate of right is confirmed under the body of section 7 if otherwise within the terms of said section.. 168 A soldiers' additional homestead entry allowed on a certificate of right issued on account of service in the Missouri Home Guards is confirmed by the proviso if other- wise within the terms of said section....... 170 The confirmatory provisions of, extend to a soldier's additional homestead entry made on a certificate of right based upon alleged service in the Missouri Home Guards, though the records of the War Department fail to show such service...........
The pendency of an application to contest an entry will not defeat its confirmation under the proviso where such application must be rejected on account of prior proceed. ings by the government, though said pro- ceedings were begun too late to prevent con- firmation
An order of the General Land Office made prior to the expiration of two years from date of final certificate, requiring the entry to approximate one hundred and sixty acres, defeats confirmation under the proviso, though the notice of such requirement was not given until after the expiration of said two years....
An entry reinstated for the purpose of ex- amining into its bona fide character and so remaining for the period of two years, is not confirmed by the proviso
Validity of, is not affected by the fact that the contestant is an alien
The Rules of Practice do not require an affidavit of, to be executed before the local officers
One who appears in response to citation and submits testimony without objection to the affidavit of, will not be heard to sub- sequently question its regularity.
When irregularly allowed (during suspen- sion of the entry) on uncorroborated affi- davit, the uncontradicted testimony thus submitted by the contestant may be after- wards taken as corroborating the affidavit and warrant proceedings when the entry is relieved from suspension
A hearing should not be ordered on an uncorroborated affidavit in which no spe- cific charge is made.
An affidavit of contest should set forth a definite charge which, if proven, will war- rant cancellation of the entry in question.. 177
In absence of a specific charge, and proof thereof, must fail, leaving the issue between the entryman and the government..
Must fail in the absence of affirmative testimony in support of the charge..... 129 The dismissal of, on the failure of the specific charge, does not relieve the entry- man from the consequences of his non-com- pliance with the requirements of the law.. 452 The failure of a party to proceed with a hearing in accordance with departmental directions does not estop him from asserting his priority of right as against the inter- vening adverse claim of a third party...... 519 Right to proceed under second, on dis- missal of the first, can not be defeated by the intervening suit and entry of another, allowed without notice to second contestant that the first contest had been dismissed.. 53 When a pending, is attacked on the ground of fraud by a second contestant, notice should not issue, but the case should be held for the final disposition of the prior suit ........
The terms of a stipulation entered into between parties to a contest should not be enforced to the exclusion of the real ques- tion at issue therein where it is apparent that said stipulation with respect to such matter is without consideration and made apparently through inadvertence
On the ground of failure to effect recla- mation within the statutory period must fail where the government has already exam- ined into the status of the entry and held the same intact
On the ground of non-compliance with law must fail where it appears that prior to the expiration of the entry the land was effect- ually reclaimed and that the failure to main- tain the requisite water supply was due to the wrongful act of the contestant; nor will such a contest defeat equitable action on the entryman's final proof submitted out of time. 36 HOMESTEAD.
A charge of abandonment and failure to reside upon the land is sufficiently specific where it is set out "that the defendant has wholly abandoned said tract, that he has changed his residence therefrom for more than six months since making said entry, and that said tract is not settled upon and cultivated by said party as re- quired by law"
Leave of absence is no protection against a contest for abandonment where the entry- man prior to such leave has failed to com- ply with the law
TIMBER CULTURE.
See Title, Timber Culture.
A charge of non-compliance with the tim- ber-culture law should be established by a preponderance of the evidence to warrant cancellation
An application to enter land embraced within the timber-culture entry of another does not give the applicant the status of a contestant under section 3, act of June 14, 1878, in the absence of the prescribed notice to the record entr yman of such application. 585 Against an entry for invalidity because made by a special grant must fail, where it appears that the entry was allowed under express ruling of the Commissioner, and the entryman afterwards complied with the law and was not in government em- ploy at the time of the contest.... TIMBER LAND.
Will lie against an entry under the act of June 3, 1878, with a preferred right to the contestant if successful...... Contestant.
A pre-emptor who contests and secures the cancellation of a prior desert-land entry in conflict with his filing, and thereupon perfects his pre-emption claim, exhausts thereby his preferred right and has no claim as a successful contestant against the re- mainder of the tract covered by the con- tested entry........... ....... 119 Who fails to secure a judgment of cancel- lation until after the repeal of the pre-emp- tion law does not have any right thereunder that falls within the protection extended by the repealing act to claims "lawfully initiated".
Who fails to exercise his preferred right within the statutory period has no protec tion as against the subsequent repeal of the timber-culture law.....
Under sect ion 2, act of July 26, 1892, the heirs of a, if citizens of the United States, are entitled to continue the prosecution of a contest, in the event of the contestant's death before the final termination of the suit. 402 suit...... 402
Who, pending his contest, purchases a re- linquishment of the contested entry and files the same does not thereby acquire the status of a successful, and the right of a set- tler, who is then residing on the land, will take effect at once on the filing of the re- linquishment and exclude the claim of the contestant
A successful, is not required to exercise his preferred right of entry until he has re- ceived due notice of the cancellation secured by his contest....................
The alienage of a, will not defeat his sub- sequent exercise of the preference right, if he is qualified in the matter of citizenship when he applies to enter......
A contestant who submits proof showing failure to effect reclamation within the statutory period, does not thereby acquire the status of an adverse claimant so as to defeat equitable action, where the govern ment on its own motion has examined into the cause of said failure and held the entry intact with a view to its equitable adjudi- cation.....
An applicant for extension of time under section 6 of the amendatory act of March 3, 1891, should file in the local office a sworn statement of his intention to proceed under said act, showing what has been done by him in regard to the land, and that since he determined to take advantage of the act in question he has complied with the provis- ions thereof..
The right to make a second, under section 2, act of March 2, 1889, can not be invoked in aid of an application to "amend" an entry made and relinquished after the pas- sage of said act....
Allowed on a preliminary affidavit exe- cuted outside of the district and State in which the land is situated, is not void but voidable, and may be amended in the ab- sence of an adverse claim..
Made by a special agent will not be can- celled for invalidity, where it was allowed under an express ruling of the Commis- sioner, and the entryman subsequently com plied with the law
Made for the benefit of a partnership, composed of the entryman and another, is illegal, and must be canceled.........
Commuted under section 1, act of March 3, 1891, and embracing land in two sections, may be allowed to stand in view of the fact that there is no express provision of law prohibiting such an entry, and that the rights of no other entryman can be affected thereby.
Equitable Action.
See Entry, Final Proof.
Local officer, whose term of office has ex- pired, may attach his signature to a jurat accompanying testimony that was taken before him while holding said office..... When testimony is taken in shorthand the stenographer's notes should be written out, and then subscribed by the witness... 133 An application for an order to take depo. sitions should be allowed if made in due compliance with the rules of practice..... On a charge that a deceased entryman in his lifetime had agreed to convey to others the land in dispute, hearsay testimony as to such agreement is incompetent
Where the defendant does not exercise the right of cross-examination, but relies upon an appeal from an interlocutory order, he will not be heard to object to the ex parte character of the testimony submitted by the contestant
Made by an administrator in his official capacity can not be amended so as to be a
« SebelumnyaLanjutkan » |