| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 halaman
...benefit o£ the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parents, and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such, employe," it expressly limits the right of recovery by the personal representative to the ibeneficiaries named,... | |
| New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1916 - 848 halaman
...such commerce, or in case of the death of such employe, to his or her personal representatives * * * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in...of any of the officers, agents or employes of such carriers. The proofs show that the ashpit was a part of the plant of the defendant company, that it... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 halaman
...any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any. of said jurisdictions, * * * for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier. * * *" "SEC. 3. That in all actions hereafter brought against... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 halaman
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." US Comp. Stat. 1913,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1917 - 780 halaman
...husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the... | |
| South Carolina. Supreme Court, James Sanders Guignard Richardson (Reporter), Robert Wallace Shand (Reporter), Cyprian Melanchton Efird (Reporter), William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray (Reporter), William Munro Shand (Reporter) - 1917 - 650 halaman
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." No change was made... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 halaman
...the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much... | |
| 1920 - 496 halaman
...benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." This amendment merely provides... | |
| 1917 - 498 halaman
...benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe; and, if none, then of such employe's parents ; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." An amendment enacted in 19102 provides: "That any right of action given by this Act to a... | |
| 1917 - 510 halaman
...surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parent; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe." In this respect the act of 1910 differs from the Arkansas statute construed in Davis v. Railway Co.,40... | |
| |