Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title Of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired... Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washington - Halaman 445oleh Washington (State). Supreme Court, Arthur Remington, Solon Dickerson Williams - 1915Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1915 - 734 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he, or some person under whom he claims, acquired the title as a holder in due course; and section 52 of that act, which defines a holder in due course... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 halaman
...course." When the plaintiff proved that the check was stolen from him, the burden shifted to the defendant to prove that he, or some person under whom he claims, acquired title as a holder in due course. Xo such evidence was offered, and no such proof was made. Furthermore though proof had been made that... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom, he claims acquired the title in due course." By section 1607 it is provided that "The title of a person who negotiates... | |
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course," etc. Under such a statute it is very clear that, when it ,' was... | |
| American Bar Association - 1905 - 980 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument is defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. This case affirms what was the law in Iowa before the adoption... | |
| 1914 - 448 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course." Section 55 declares that " the title of a person who negotiates... | |
| 1915 - 1230 halaman
...and were assured by Thompson that the notes were first-class paper, and would be promptly paid. [2] The law applicable to these facts will now be noticed....Is upon the owner of the Instrument to prove that be, or some person under whom he claims, acquired title as a holder In due course. Rem. & Bal. Code,... | |
| 1911 - 1164 halaman
...burden of proceeding or of going forward, but the burden of establishing the existence of facts showing that he, or some person under whom he claims, acquired title as a holder In due course, and as defined in section 1604, which Includes the fact that at the time the note was negotiated he,... | |
| 1915 - 1116 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." As already stated, the defendant offered evidence to show that... | |
| 1913 - 1322 halaman
...the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he, or some person under whom he claims, acquired title as a holder in due course. This rule, however, does not apply In favor of a party who become bound on the Instrument prior to... | |
| |