 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1852 - 560 halaman
...statute of 13th Eliz., when he says, that " whenever the act done takes effect as to some persons, and is void as to persons who have an interest in...impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable." Ai the common law, such conveyances are,... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1861 - 618 halaman
...JR, 515, 524, will be found an admirable discussion of this point by Ch. Justice SPENCER. Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...election of others, it is not utterly void. (See Bac. Abr. Title, void and voidable.) There is a case in 2 Salk., 674, Peigg agt. Adams, which is very applicable... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - 1873 - 544 halaman
...void as to some persons only, and says it is good as to the donor, and void as to creditors. Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not ufcterly void, but merely voidable." FBANKIIN v. KELLEY. veyance to a third... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court - 1873 - 548 halaman
...void as to some persona only, and says it is good as to the donor, and void as to creditors. Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable." I concede that this case does not dispose... | |
 | 1899 - 2058 halaman
...v. Roberts, 18 Johns. 529, Spencer, GJ, in differentiating void and voidable acts, said: "Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...to persons who have an interest in Impeaching It, that act is not a nullity, and therefore. In a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court - 1880 - 696 halaman
...statute of 13th Eliz., when he says, that " whenever the act done takes effect as to some persons, and is void as to persons who have an interest in...impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and, therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable." At the common law, such conveyances are,... | |
 | 1906 - 2260 halaman
...14 Ohio, 80.) It is said by Mr. Chief Justice Spencer, in Anderson v. Roberts, 18 JR 528, "Whenever the act done takes effect as. to some purposes, and...impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable. Another test of a void act or deed is,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1906 - 1116 halaman
...In Bump on Fraudulent Conveyances, second edition, page 482, the principle is thus stated: "Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...interest in impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable. The transfer, however, is good between... | |
 | 1912 - 1134 halaman
...used this language : "Chief Justice Spencer, delivering the opinion of the court says that 'whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and is void as to persons having an interest in Impeaching it, the act is not a nullity ; and therefore, in a legal sense, it... | |
 | 1899 - 806 halaman
...v. Roberts, 18 Johns. 529, Spencer, CJ. in differentiating void and voidable acts, said: "Whenever the act done takes effect as to some purposes, and...to persons who have an interest in impeaching it, that act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable.... | |
| |
Whenever the act done takes effect as. to some purposes, and is void as to persons who have an interest in impeaching it, the act is not a nullity, and therefore, in a legal sense, is not utterly void, but merely voidable. 
