Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

No. 71-6144. FAY v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 71-6147. C. A. 5th Cir. F.2d 376.

EARIN V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 453

No. 71-6148. KUJACA v. DALY. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 71-6149. EDWARDS v. SWENSON, WARDEN. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 454 F. 2d 1106.

No. 71-6150. MCGARRITY V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 452 F. 2d 1206.

No. 71-6151. MOORE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 446 F. 2d 448.

No. 71-6159. WILSON v. ROWE, INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 454 F. 2d 585.

No. 71-6160. REED V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 71-6162. REDDEN V. TENNESSEE. Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.

No. 70-5417. HOLMES v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JusTICE POWELL are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Reported below: 258 La. 221, 245 So. 2d 707.

No. 71-1023. CRANSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Reported below: 453 F. 2d 123.

[blocks in formation]

No. 71-964. PENNSYLVANIA v. WARE. Sup. Ct. Pa. The order of this Court dated March 20, 1972 [405 U. S. 987], insofar as it granted the petition for writ of certiorari, is vacated. Certiorari denied, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground. Reported below: 446 Pa. 52, 284 A. 2d 700.

Ct. Crim.

No. 71-977. SHEPHERD V. OKLAHOMA. App. Okla. Motions to dispense with printing petition and respondent's briefs granted. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Reported below: 489 P. 2d 529.

No. 71-5845. COLEMAN v. CRAMER. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

No. 71-6120. SHIELDS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted Reported below: 453 F. 2d 1235.

No. 71-1144. MILSTEIN ET AL. v. GAF CORP.; and No. 71-1161. GAF CORP. V. MILSTEIN. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 71-1144. Reported below: 453 F. 2d 709.

No. 71-5423. MOSES ET AL. v. WASHINGTON. Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Reported below: 79 Wash. 2d 104, 483 P. 2d 832.

No. 71-6141. SMITH V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 452 F. 2d 638.

[blocks in formation]

No. 71-6152. UNDERWOOD v. ROUSE ET AL. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Rehearing Denied

No. 70-5058. LYNCH ET AL. v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP. ET AL., 405 U. S. 538;

No. 71-247. RABE V. WASHINGTON, 405 U. S. 313; No. 71-600. STATE BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS ET AL. V. EVERS ET AL., 405 U. S. 1001;

No. 71-852. C. D. CONSTRUCTION CORP. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 405 U. S. 988; No. 71-853.

988;

GREENBERG v. UNITED STATES, 405 U. S.

No. 71-948. GIPE, GUARDIAN V. DEMPSEY ET AL., 405 U. S. 990;

No. 71-987. MOODY v. MOODY, 405 U. S. 990;

No. 71-1009. LINDAUER V. OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY ET AL., 405 U. S. 1017;

No. 71-1061. ARNESON PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v. BLUMENFELD, 405 U. S. 1017;

No. 71-5127. HARDEE V. NELSON, WARDEN, 404 U. S. 1060;

No. 71-5428. LIPSCOMB v. UNITED STATES, 404 U. S. 1021;

No. 71-5545. COLLINS v. MICHIGAN, 405 U. S. 991; No. 71-5624. ALCALA U. WYOMING, 405 U. S. 997; No. 71-5817. BURNS v. COLUMBIA PICTURES INTERNATIONAL CORP. ET AL., 405 U. S. 991; and

No. 71-5883. BIBLE V. ARIZONA ET AL., 405 U. S. 994. Petitions for rehearing denied.

No. 71-5375. STANLEY v. UNITED STATES, 404 U. S. 996; and

No. 71-5771. MUNCASTER V. UNITED STATES, 405 U. S. 979. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.

May 5, 8, 12, 1972

Miscellaneous Orders

MAY 5, 1972

406 U.S.

No. A-1106. GEORGIA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. D. C. N. D. Ga. Application of the United States to vacate stay order of this Court heretofore granted on April 21, 1972 [ante, p. 901], denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the application should be granted.

No. A-1116. ESSEX, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF OHIO, ET AL. v. WOLMAN ET AL. D. C. S. D. Ohio. Application for stay of order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Civ. No. 71-396, presented to MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and by him referred to the Court, denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE WHITE, and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST are of the opinion that the application should be granted.

No. A-1121. LUROS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay presented to MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

MAY 8, 1972

Dismissal Under Rule 60

No. 70-5005. TERRY V. CALIFORNIA. Sup. Ct. Cal. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. Reported below: 2 Cal. 3d 362, 466 P. 2d 961.

Miscellaneous Order

MAY 12, 1972

No. A-1179. KLEINDIENST, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. WASHINGTON POST CO. ET AL. D. C. D. C. Application of the Solicitor General. for stay of judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

[blocks in formation]

Columbia (Civ. Action No. 467-72), presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court, granted pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would deny stay and leave Judge Gesell's order in effect pending appeal. See Vanden Heuvel, The Press and the Prisons, 11 Col. Journalism Rev. 35 (May/ June 1972). MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL are of the opinion that the application should be denied.

Affirmed on Appeal

MAY 15, 1972

No. 71-1156. GRIVETTI ET AL. V. ILLINOIS STATE ELECTORAL BOARD ET AL.; and

No. 71-1246. INDEPENDENT VOTERS OF ILLINOIS ET AL. v. LEWIS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS, ET AL. Affirmed on appeals from D. C. N. D. Ill. Reported below: 335 F. Supp. 779.

No. 71-1176. OSWALD, CORRECTION COMMISSIONER, ET AL. V. GESICKI ET AL. Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Reported below: 336 F. Supp. 365 and 371.

No. 71-5872. VAN EEGHEN v. FLORIDA ET AL. Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla.

Appeals Dismissed

No. 71-801. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION ET AL. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Cal. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Reported below: 5 Cal. 3d 730, 488 P. 2d 953.

No. 71-6360. TOCZAUER v. STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS OF CALIFORNIA. Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »