United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 213United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1909 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 100
Halaman iii
... United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner. TABLE OF CONTENTS . TABLE OF CASES REPORTED . Albany and Susquehanna Railroad Company , Delaware and Hudson Company v . • American ...
... United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner. TABLE OF CONTENTS . TABLE OF CASES REPORTED . Albany and Susquehanna Railroad Company , Delaware and Hudson Company v . • American ...
Halaman iv
... United States v . 366 Central Railroad Company of New Jersey , United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v . McCabe , Ad- ministratrix • 366 207 Cincinnati , New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway ...
... United States v . 366 Central Railroad Company of New Jersey , United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v . McCabe , Ad- ministratrix • 366 207 Cincinnati , New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway ...
Halaman v
... United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Evans , United States v . Gibson ( United States ex rel . ) , Davidson Bros. Marble Company v . Gorman , Administrator , Bonner v . PAGE 25 366 · 366 297 10 86 Grand Central Mining Company ...
... United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Evans , United States v . Gibson ( United States ex rel . ) , Davidson Bros. Marble Company v . Gorman , Administrator , Bonner v . PAGE 25 366 · 366 297 10 86 Grand Central Mining Company ...
Halaman vi
... United States v . 366 Central Railroad Company of New Jersey , United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v . McCabe , Ad- ministratrix Cincinnati , New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Com- pany ...
... United States v . 366 Central Railroad Company of New Jersey , United States ex rel . Attorney General v . Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v . McCabe , Ad- ministratrix Cincinnati , New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Com- pany ...
Halaman vii
... United States ex rel . Attorney General v . 366 Evans , United States v . 297 Gibson ( United States ex rel . ) , Davidson Bros. Marble Company v . 10 Gorman , Administrator , Bonner v . 86 Grand Central Mining Company , Mammoth Mining ...
... United States ex rel . Attorney General v . 366 Evans , United States v . 297 Gibson ( United States ex rel . ) , Davidson Bros. Marble Company v . 10 Gorman , Administrator , Bonner v . 86 Grand Central Mining Company , Mammoth Mining ...
Isi
1 | |
2 | |
11 | |
20 | |
25 | |
52 | |
55 | |
59 | |
245 | |
257 | |
273 | |
283 | |
285 | |
288 | |
291 | |
298 | |
85 | |
86 | |
89 | |
103 | |
115 | |
126 | |
127 | |
135 | |
136 | |
138 | |
151 | |
152 | |
155 | |
161 | |
170 | |
174 | |
177 | |
184 | |
187 | |
199 | |
209 | |
211 | |
223 | |
227 | |
307 | |
338 | |
346 | |
356 | |
361 | |
363 | |
366 | |
381 | |
411 | |
435 | |
445 | |
453 | |
458 | |
472 | |
473 | |
476 | |
478 | |
482 | |
493 | |
498 | |
502 | |
514 | |
516 | |
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
213 U. S. Opinion 213 U.S. Argument act of March action affirmed agent alleged Amendment appellee authority bankruptcy bill carrier cause certiorari Circuit Court citizens claim coal company commission commodities clause complainant Congress Constitution construction construed contract corporation Court of Appeals court of equity creditors criminal decision decree defendant in error Delaware delivered the opinion directors dispensary equity Ex parte Young facts February 23 Federal court Federal question filed foreign patent fraud Government granted held interest interstate commerce judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE Kentucky lands legislation mined Missouri Missouri River offense parties patent in suit Pennsylvania person petition petitioner plaintiff in error policyholders proceedings prohibitions provisions purchase purpose railroad company railway company rates record regulate rule Rule 94 South Carolina Stat statute stockholders Supreme Court Susquehanna Company Territory thereof tion transportation trial trust U.S. Opinion United valid violation writ of error
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 116 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States...
Halaman 443 - ... not a collusive one to confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction of a case of which it would not otherwise have cognizance. It must also set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure such action as he desires on the part of the managing directors or trustees and, if necessary, of the shareholders, and the causes of his failure to obtain such action or the reasons for not making such effort.
Halaman 98 - That all the before-mentioned courts of the United States shall have power to issue writs of scire facias, habeas corpus, and all other writs, not specially provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the principles and usages of law.
Halaman 143 - This government is acknowledged by all to be one of enumerated powers. The principle, that it can exercise only the powers granted to it, would seem too apparent to have required to be enforced by all those arguments which its enlightened friends, while it was depending before the people, found is necessary to urge. That principle is now universally admitted.
Halaman 238 - If a bankrupt shall have given a preference within four months before the filing of a petition, or after the filing of the petition and before the adjudication, and the person receiving it, or to be benefited thereby, or his agent acting therein, shall have had reasonable cause to believe that it was intended thereby to give a preference, it shall be voidable by the trustee, and he may recover the property or its value from such person.
Halaman 135 - We think that in all cases of this nature the law has invested courts of justice with the authority to discharge a jury from giving any verdict whenever, in their opinion, taking all the circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.
Halaman 237 - ... suffered a judgment to be entered against himself in favor of any person, or made a transfer of any of his property, and the effect of the enforcement of such judgment or transfer will be to enable any one of his creditors to obtain a greater percentage of his debt than any other of such creditors of the same class.
Halaman 211 - Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause; and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void ; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal, in opposition to them.
Halaman 444 - ... he has exhausted all the means within his reach to obtain, within the corporation itself, the redress of his grievances, or action in conformity to his wishes.
Halaman 13 - All laws should receive a sensible construction. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or an absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to its language, which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter.