The American Constitution and Its ProvenanceRowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1997 - 382 halaman In this comprehensive collection of essays representing a lifetime of scholarship, distinguished political scientist Richard Stevens examines the fundamental principles of the American Constitutional order. Stevens discusses the Constitution's roots in Renaissance and Enlightenment political philosophy, and evaluates several major twentieth-century constitutional commentators. With a focus on the core of constitutional principle, Stevens critiques such views as that the Constitution founds a mixed regime, or is rooted in Christianity, or is a 'living constitution, ' or is to be interpreted in the light of a 'higher law background.' Broad in scope and penetrating in analysis, this book is essential reading for students and scholars of constitutional law, American political thought, and American history. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-3 dari 44
Halaman 80
... distinction had been between freedom and slavery . Since Hobbes , we have tended instead to distinguish between ... distinction between those two states that Hobbes had so clearly identified with each other . But the clear distinction ...
... distinction had been between freedom and slavery . Since Hobbes , we have tended instead to distinguish between ... distinction between those two states that Hobbes had so clearly identified with each other . But the clear distinction ...
Halaman 83
Richard G. Stevens. the distinction between " unlimited " and " arbitrarily " as a distinction between a substantive and a formal limitation by citation of other passages in the Second Treatise , or even elsewhere in Locke , comes to ...
Richard G. Stevens. the distinction between " unlimited " and " arbitrarily " as a distinction between a substantive and a formal limitation by citation of other passages in the Second Treatise , or even elsewhere in Locke , comes to ...
Halaman 228
... distinction in order to defend trash before the courts do by that denial put themselves out of a job . In the course of acknowledging the difficulty in defining the distinction , Berns reminds us that obscenity , in and of itself , is ...
... distinction in order to defend trash before the courts do by that denial put themselves out of a job . In the course of acknowledging the difficulty in defining the distinction , Berns reminds us that obscenity , in and of itself , is ...
Isi
The People the Great and the Wise 1992 | 3 |
Machiavellis Burlesque of Aristotles Ethics 1986 | 19 |
of Hobbes 1989 | 59 |
Hak Cipta | |
13 bagian lainnya tidak diperlihatkan
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
Adeimantus American Constitution American political American regime ancient argued argument Aristotle Aristotle's Article assertion believe Berns Bill of Rights called chapter Christianity city in speech civil society commerce common Congress conscience Corwin Declaration difference division of labor doctrine due process clause edition English equal ethnic fact federal Federalist Felix Frankfurter Founders Fourteenth Amendment Framers Frankfurter freedom Glaucon Hobbes and Locke human Ibid Joseph Cropsey judges judicial review justice legislative power legislature Leo Strauss Leviathan liberal democracy liberty limits living constitution Machiavelli Marx matter means ment mixed regime modern republic moral natural rights opinion perfect perhaps Plato polis politeia political order political philosophy Political Science president Prince principles problem process of law question Rahe religion rule sect sense shows simply Socrates speak stitution Supreme Court things thought tion true United Utopia virtue Walter Berns whole word