Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF FEES OF COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS.

ORDER.

In pursuance of section 29 of the amendments enacted by section 28 of the act of Congress approved August 5, 1909 (c. 6, sec. 28, 36 Stat. 11, 91, 105)—

It is now here ordered by this Court that the amendment to the revised table of fees of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals adopted October 19, 1936, be, and the same is hereby, adopted and approved, viz:

Amend Rule V by changing the language of subdivision 5 so that the same shall read: For filing and docketing each patent appeal, $12, this fee to be in full of all fees in the case, except the charge for preparing and supervising the printing of the record: Provided, That when an appeal is taken by or on behalf of the United States, no payment of fees shall be required.

NOVEMBER 9, 1936.

626

AMENDMENT OF RULES.

ORDER.

It is ordered that Rule 2 of the Rules of this Court be, and it is hereby, amended, effective February 1, 1937, so as to read as follows:

1. It shall be requisite to the admission of attorneys or counsellors to practice in this court, that they shall have been such for three years past in the highest court of a State, Territory, District, or Insular Possession, and that their private and professional characters shall appear to be good.

2. Not less than two weeks in advance of application for admission, each applicant shall file with the clerk (1) a certificate from the presiding judge or clerk of the proper court showing that he possesses the foregoing qualifications, (2) his personal statement under oath setting out the date and place of his birth, the names of his parents, his place of residence and office address, the courts of last resort to which he has been admitted, the places where he has been a practitioner, and, if he is not a native-born citizen, the date and place of his naturalization, and information respecting any reprimand of any court pertaining to his conduct or fitness as a member of the bar, and (3) two letters or signed statements of members of the bar of this court, not related to the applicant, who are resident practitioners within the State, Territory, District, or Insular Possession (to which the application refers as provided in paragraph 1 of this rule) stating that the applicant is personally known to them, that he possesses all the qualifications required for admission to the bar of this court, that they have examined his personal statement and that they affirm that his personal and professional character and standing are good.

3. Admissions will be granted only upon oral motion by a member of the bar in open court, and upon his assurance that he has examined the credentials of the applicant filed in the office of the clerk in accordance with the foregoing requirement and that he is satisfied that the applicant possesses the necessary qualifications.

DECEMBER 7, 1936.

INDEX

ACCOUNTS. See Telephone Companies.

ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES. See Executors and Adminis-

trators.

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS. See Court of Claims; Evidence, 9;
Extradition; Indians, 7; Interstate Commerce Acts, 3; Procla-
mations; Public Officers; Telephone Companies.

1. Administrative construction of order. A. T. & T. Co. v. U. S.,
232.

2. Weight of administrative construction. Brown Lumber Co. v.
L. & N. R. Co., 393; N. Y. ex rel. Rogers v. Graves, 401.

3. Findings of jurisdictional facts. U. S. v. Curtiss-Wright
Corp., 304.

4. Scope of Review. A. T. & T. Co. v. U. S., 232.
ADMIRALTY.

Maritime Law. Uniformity. Application of state workmen's
compensation act; non-maritime contract. Carlin Construction Co.
v. Heaney, 41.

ADMISSION TO BAR.

Amendment of Rules of this Court, p. 627.

AGENCY. See Antitrust Acts, 1; Public Officers.
ANTITRUST ACTS.

As to validity of state Fair Trade Acts, see Old Dearborn Co. v.
Seagram-Distillers Corp., 183; Pep Boys v. Pyroil Sales Co., 198.

1. Violations. Contract between automobile manufacturer and
dealer relating to sale and use of parts as violation of Clayton
Act. Pick Mfg. Co. v. General Motors Corp., 3.

2. Id. Sufficiency of evidence; misinterpretation of former opin-
ion. Prairie Farmer Co. v. Indiana Farmer's Guide Co., 156.
APPEARANCE.

General Appearance. Effect of obtaining removal of cause to
federal court. Employers Corp. v. Bryant, 374.

APPROPRIATIONS.

1. Appropriation bill and "item of appropriation bill" defined.
Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice, 410.

2. Construction of Indian Appropriation Acts. U. S. v. Seminole
Nation, 417.

ASSIGNMENT. See Bankruptcy, 10.

ASSOCIATIONS.

See McKee v. Paradise, 120.

ATTORNEYS.

Amendment of Rules relating to admission to bar of this Court,
p. 627.

ATTORNEY'S FEES.

Right to, as question of state practice. Kammerer v. Kroeger,
302.

AVULSION.

Effect on boundary and private ownership. Shapleigh v. Mier,
468.

BANKRUPTCY.

1. Jurisdiction. Power to enjoin suit under § 33 of Merchant
Marine Act against corporation in reorganization proceeding.
Foust v. Munson S. S. Lines, 77.

2. Reorganization Proceedings. Validity of § 77B. Kuehner v.
Irving Trust Co., 445.

3. Id. Purpose and effect of § 77B. City Bank Co. v. Irving
Trust Co., 433.

4. Id. “Adequate protection" of claims. In re 620 Church St.
Corp., 24.

5. Id. Provable Debts. Claim against steamship corporation
under § 33 of Merchant Marine Act. Foust v. Munson S. S. Lines,

77.

6. Id. Leases. Claim of landlord upon rejected lease; lessor as
"person injured." City Bank Co. v. Irving Trust Co., 433.

7. Id. Effect of termination of leasehold. City Bank Co. v.
Irving Trust Co., 433; Schwartz v. Irving Trust Co., 456.
8. Id.

Limit of amount allowable upon landlords' claims.
Kuehner v. Irving Trust Co., 445.

9. Id. Release by landlord as affecting right to reassert claim
in § 77B proceeding; effect of reservation in release. Schwartz v.
Irving Trust Co., 456; Meadows v. Irving Trust Co., 464.

[ocr errors]
« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »