 | 1916 - 1132 halaman
...other directors as herein alleged." In Crane v. Ailing, 15 NJ Law, 423, It was held that a release to one of two joint and several obligors is a release to both, but that a covenant not to sue one of several obligors does not have the effect of a release... | |
 | 1903 - 1130 halaman
...*Davis, and was in law, as it was in fact intended to be, an absolute discharge thereof, as to Blow. A release to one of two joint obligors, or to one...been held to be otherwise in a court of equity. The principle, that a release to one is a release to all, not less obligatory on courts of equity than... | |
 | 1847 - 1204 halaman
...think, ought not to be given to it. With respect to the third plea, the objection it, that a release to one of two joint and several obligors is a release to both obligors, and that the proviso is repugnant, and, therefore, invalid : but this is a purely technical... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1856 - 912 halaman
...Davis, and was in law, as it was in fact intended to be, an absolute discharge thereof, as to Blow. A release to one of two joint obligors, or to one...this is so, in a court of law ; and there is not an inYoung cannot strengthen the case ; for, by the release, 1930 the bond was functus ojficio ; there... | |
| |
A release to one of two joint obligors, or to one of two joint and several obligors, is a release to the other. The bond is thereby discharged as to both, and no action can be sustained upon it. No body denies that this is so, in a court of law; and there... 