 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1894 - 722 halaman
...covenant being one which does not run with the laud, this court cannot enforce it ; but the question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased. Of course, the price should be affected by the covenant, and nothing could be more inequitable than... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1886 - 822 halaman
...Paige 412; Kerr on Inj. 531. " The question," says Lord Cottenham, in Tuck v. Moxhuy, IS LJ (Ch.) 83, " is not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased." De Matios v. Gibson, 4 DC (1. & J. 282 ; Mmatgenes Imperiales v. Bainex, 11 W. 11. 322; SC, 7 LT (N.... | |
 | 1869 - 810 halaman
...covenant being one which does not run with the land this Court cannot enforce it; but the question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased" — of course the price will be affected by the covenant. And again he says, "That the question does... | |
 | Thomas Jodrell Phillips, Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1849 - 914 halaman
...with the land, this Court cannot enforce it; but the question is, not whether the covenant runs wiih the land, but whether a party shall be permitted to use the land in a manner inconsistent with (a) 9 Sim. 196. (c) 15 Sim. 379. (A) 10&M.35. 1848. with the contract entered into by his vendor, and... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1850 - 744 halaman
...one which does not run with the land, this court cannot enforce it; but the question is, not \vhether the covenant runs with the land, but whether a party...inconsistent *with the contract entered into by his vendor, [*778] and with notice of which he purchased. Of course, the price would be affected by the covenant,... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1867 - 664 halaman
...the grantee with notice. The Lord Chancellor said the question was, not " whether the covenant ran with the land, but whether a party shall be permitted to use the land inconsistently with the contract entered into by his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased."... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1916 - 720 halaman
...covenant being one which does not run with the land, this court cannot enforce it; but the question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor and with notice of which he purchased. Of course, the price would be affected by the covenant, and nothing could be more inequitable than... | |
 | 1862 - 802 halaman
...against a purchaser with notice. The Lord Chancellor said the question was not "whether the covenant ran with the land, but whether a party shall be permitted...his vendor, and with notice of which 'he purchased ;" which he answers at once in the negative, saying : " If an equity is attached to the property by... | |
 | Francis Law Latham - 1867 - 324 halaman
...covenant being one which does not run with the land, this court cannot enforce it ; but the question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased. Of course the price would be affected by the covenant, and nothing would be more inequitable than that... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, William Mawdesley Best, George James Philip Smith - 1869 - 1030 halaman
...other purpose, Lord Cottenham C. refused a motion to discharge it: he said, pp. 777-8, " The question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but...his vendor, and with notice of which he purchased." "If an equity is attached to the property by the owner, no one purchasing with notice of that equity... | |
| |
... the question is, not whether the covenant runs with the land, but whether a party shall be permitted to use the land in a manner inconsistent with the contract entered into by his vendor and with notice of which he purchased. 
