Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co......35 Star Bucket & Pump Co. v. Butler Mfg. Co.... Stearns Mfg. Co. v. Beard Steck Sutro Bros. Braid Co. v. Schloss Stuart & Bridge 29 41, 47 .41, 44, 46, 50, 65, 74 17,57 .47 ..28 .72 .99 Tilden, Thurber Co. v. T. W. Foster & Bro. 29 .103 .47 INDEX. The references are to pages. Aggregation, Not invention Act of, 1842, 1861, 1870 and May 9, 1902 Page ..5 .9-77 Not patentable Proper ground of rejection Analogous arts, Discussion of Search not limited to .53 33 .54 .48 Appeals, Rules governing .71 Appearance, .112 When word description should be used in ..93 .94 novelty Configuration, When it must be disclosed Classification Mere substitution not invention Combinations, applicable to designs Common knowledge, may be used in determining .109 .56 ... .57 53 74 28 ... Must be disclosed if an element of the design. ...97 May indicate "distinguishing” features of design.87 ..83 Word description both approved and disapproved. 83 ..79 Photograph sufficient ..80 Component detail may be patented Machine not patentable as a Not registrable to another as a trademark Registrable as trademark if expired .... Name of not registrable as trademark How classified ... .13 ..21 24-36-37 One tributary to another Detail of design patentable Disclaimer, of shape of article Division, a mechanical application not proper of |