London & Blackhall Rw. Co. v. Limehouse District Board of Works, 3 K. & J. 123 London & Brighton Rw. Co. v. Truman, 11 A.C. 45 London Financial Assoc. v. Kelk, 26 Ch. D. 107 ..408 ..219 .280 London & North Western Rw. Co. v. Evans [1893] ↑ Ch. 16 ..462 Lord Advocate for Scotland v. Hamilton, 1 Macq. H.L. 46 McArthur v. Northern & Pacific Junction Rw. Co., 17 A.R. 86 II .462 McCabe v. Old Dominion, 31 Fed. Rep. 234 MacKenzie, The James, 2 Stu. Adm. 87 ..364 .318, 358 McMillan v. "Cuba," 15 Ex. C.R. 135; 26 S.C.R. 651 .317, 318, 358, 364, 378, 479 M. Madden v. Nelson & Ft. Sheppard Rw. Co., 5 B.C.R. 541; [1899] A.C. 626 .8, 458 Main v. Stark, 15 A.C. 384 ...406 Manchester, Sheffield & Lincolnshire Rw. Co. v. Great Northern Rw. Co., 9 Hare 284 .420 Manufacturers' Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Western Assce. Co., 145 Mayor, etc. Wolverhampton v. Emmons [1901] 1 K.B. 515 ..104 Medway Co. v. Romney, 9 C.B.N.S. 575 .398, 417 Metropolitan Asylum v. Hill, 6 A.C. 193 .219, 459 Metropolitan Rw. Co. v. Fowler, [1893] A.C. 416 .417, 422 Mexico, The, 84 Fed. Rep. 504 .317, 359 Miller v. Grand Trunk Rw. Co. [1906] A.C. 187 Mollwo March v. Court of Wards, L.R. 4 C.P. 419 .459 Monk v. Ouimet, 19 L.C.J. 75 511 Moore v. Woodstock Woollen Mills Co., 29 S.C.R. 627 .530 Mourne, The, [1901] P. 68 .... .300, 361 Mountcashell v. O'Neil, 5 H.L.C. 937 32 Monte Rosa, The, [1893] P. 23 81 Montreal v. Ecclésiastiques de St. Sulpice, 14 A.C. 660 64 .265, 269 Montreal St. Rw. Co. Montreal [1906] A.C. 100 ..141 Municipal Bldg. Soc. v. Kent, 9 A.C. 260 .462 Musselburgh Real Estate Co. v. Provost of Musselburgh [1905] A.C. 491 ..454 N. Natal Colonial Secretary v. Behrens, 58 L.J.P.C. 98 New York, The, v. Rea, 18 How. 223 456 .462 168 ..316 .317, 359, 365 .358 ..462 .358 Niagara Falls Park v. Howard, 23 O.R. 1; 23 A.R. 355 Nor, The, 30 L.T. 376 North Eastern Marine Engineering Co. v. Leeds Forge Co. [1906] O'Connor v. Nova Scotia Telephone Co., 22 S.C.R. 276 O'Mahoney v. Burdett, L.R. 7 H.L. 388 Ont. Mining Co. v. Seybold [1903] A.C. 73 Ottawa, The, 3 Wall. 268 Otto, The, [1894] A.C. 116 O'Shanassy v. Joachim, 1 A.C. 82 Overend v. Gurney Co., 5 E. & Ir., App. C. 480 P. .... Page v. McLennan, 7 Que. S.C. 368, 9 Que. S.C. 193 Parkersburg, The, Fed. Cas. No. 10, 753 Patton v. Macdonald, 30 N.B.R. 523 Paul v. Rex, 38 S.C.R. 126 Peerless, The, (1860) Lush. 30 Pekin, The, [1897] A.C. 532 People v. Lawrence, 54 Barb. 612 Perim, The, Marsden, 4 ed., p. 514 .317 .461 .158 ..462 .316, 358 .318 23 .280 .462 .158 .316, 359 .31, 42 .504 .379 .75, 81, 90 32 .362 23 Pharmaceutical Society v. London & Provincial Supply Assoc., 5 A.C. Poole v. Washington, Fed. Cas. No. 11,271 .316 ..461 ... 31 .512, 513, 514 Princess Royal, Cook V.-Ad. R. 247 .361 Provincial Ins. Co. v. Etna Ins. Co., 16 U.C.R. 135 .168, 180 Q. Quebec v. Regina, 2 Ex. C.R. 269; 24 S.C.R. 429 .504, 505, 508 .362 R. R. v. Badger, 6 El. & Bl. 136 R. v. Can. Sugar Refining Co. [1898] A.C. 735 R. v. Doyle, 12 O.R. 347 R. v. Epsom, 4 E. & B. 1008 R. v. Ettinger, 32 N.S.R. 176; 3 Can. Cr. Cas. 387 .284 .462 .461 .31, 46, 47, 57, 62 : 32 31 510, 517 .461 .458 502, 504, 515, 516 62 55 R. v. Grenier, 6 Ex. C.R. 276; 30 S.C.R. 42..3, 502, 503, 507, 508, 515, 518 Regent's Canal City & Docks Co. v. School Board for London [1885] Rolls v. St. George's Vestry, 14 Ch. D. 785 ...414 Royle v. Can. North. Rw. Co., 14 Man. L.R. 275 Russell v. Regina, 7 A.C. 829 Ryder v. Rex, 9 Ex. C.R. 335; 36 S.C.R. 462 .518 530 .3, II 504, 516 Saunby v. London Water Comrs., C.R. [1906] A.C. I .411, 430 Schroeder v. Merchants' & Mechanics' Ins. Co., 12 Ins. L.J. 9 168 Nav., L.R. I H.L. 254 Stanmore, The, 10 P.D. 134 Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal Nav. v. Birmingham Canal Stockport Waterworks Co. v. Potter, 3 H. & C. 300 .402 .362 396 C.R. [1907] A.C. 2* Sydney & Louisville Coal & Rw. Co. v. Sword, 21 S.C.R. 152 .458 .313, 318, 323, 355, 358, 363, 367, 378 Tyler v. Wilkinson, 4 Manson 397 .394 .422 |