 | Leonard MacNally - 1802 - 316 halaman
...jurifdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queCtion, though within their jurifdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. Upon the fubject of marriage, the fpiritual court has the fole and exclufive cognizance... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 halaman
...jurifdidtion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. It was alfo the opinion of the judges, that, fuppofing the fcntence to be conclufive... | |
 | Thomas Bayly Howell - 1814 - 730 halaman
...upon the same matter, between the same parties, coining incidentally in question in another court, for a different purpose. -But neither the judgment...nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from tbe judgment Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1816 - 746 halaman
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their )iiri«dicfion, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 halaman
...between the same partics coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose, yet neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive...collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment.... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - 1817 - 624 halaman
...conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose. But neither the judgment...concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction,... | |
 | William Cruise - 1818 - 648 halaman
...conclusive, upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose. But neither the judgment...collaterally in question, though, within their jurisdiction j nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1820 - 838 halaman
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of Concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in...of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment.(2) But, although such sentences are conclusive, and cannot be impeached from within, yet,... | |
 | Matthew Hale - 1820 - 582 halaman
...conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court, for a different purpose. But neither the judgment...exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter which carte collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable... | |
 | Thomas Peake - 1822 - 666 halaman
...in question in another Vide 1 1 St. court for a different purpose. But neither the judgTr. aoi. ment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence...their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognisable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Judgments which are merely... | |
| |
... in question in another Court ; secondly, that the judgment of a Court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another Court... 
