Federal Supplement, Volume 210West Publishing Company, 1963 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-3 dari 6
Halaman 514
... BROWNFIELD V. WILLIAMS AND DUNLAP CON- STRUCTION COMPANY , INC . , ET AL . Conner and Brownfield was the con- crete subcontractor . Their contract ap- pears in the record as P - 3 . They seek to recover their final estimate and for ...
... BROWNFIELD V. WILLIAMS AND DUNLAP CON- STRUCTION COMPANY , INC . , ET AL . Conner and Brownfield was the con- crete subcontractor . Their contract ap- pears in the record as P - 3 . They seek to recover their final estimate and for ...
Halaman 515
... Brownfield's lawyer wrote Conner and Brownfield's bonding company claiming set - offs against Sam Young as a result of : 66 * * * improper work by him . and due to the fact that Williams and Dunlap , the prime contractor , are ...
... Brownfield's lawyer wrote Conner and Brownfield's bonding company claiming set - offs against Sam Young as a result of : 66 * * * improper work by him . and due to the fact that Williams and Dunlap , the prime contractor , are ...
Halaman 517
... Brownfield subcontract for concrete work is $ 109,523.67 . " Plaintiff insists that the stipulated figure was the base contract price after deducting the $ 10,150 omitted from the contract by the amendment ( P - 3 ) of June 27 , 1957 ...
... Brownfield subcontract for concrete work is $ 109,523.67 . " Plaintiff insists that the stipulated figure was the base contract price after deducting the $ 10,150 omitted from the contract by the amendment ( P - 3 ) of June 27 , 1957 ...
Isi
Judges | |
Table of Cases Reported XIX | |
Court of Claims Rules XLIV | |
2 bagian lainnya tidak diperlihatkan
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District ..., Volume 272 Tampilan cuplikan - 1968 |
Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District ..., Volume 222 Tampilan cuplikan - 1964 |
Istilah dan frasa umum
1882 reservation agent agreement alleged amended amount appears application authority Brownfield carrier cause of action CHIEF JUDGE Cite as 210 City claim claimant Clayton Act Commissioner Company complaint Constitution contract contractor corporation counsel damages December 16 decision Declaratory Judgment defendant defendant's denied dismiss District Court District Judge entitled evidence executive order F.Supp federal fendant filed held Hopi Reservation Illinois injury insured interest Internal Revenue issue jurisdiction jury Keams Canyon L.Ed land Lawrenson liability libel Lucas ment motion Navajo Indian negligence O'Daniel operation opinion owner paid parties patent payment person petition petitioner plain plaintiff prior proceedings pursuant question reasonable record rule S.Ct Secretary Section settled settlor Shreveport sion soap Stat statute of limitations subcontractor suit summary judgment supra taxpayer testimony thereof tiff tion Tompkinsville trial trust United States District Williams and Dunlap York