...an instanc* where the judge may thus interfere. Conrad e. Williams. verdict. I do not intend to say that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding a promise of some kind ; but only that there was no sufficient ground for finding any of the promises...

...defendant, either alone, or as a member of the acting committee, or on the credit of the funds; and that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that the plaintiff looked to be paid out of the funds only; that the employment of the plaintiff prima facie...

...the defendant, either alone or as a member of the acting committee, or on the credit of the fund; and that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that the plaintiff looked to be paid out of the funds only; that the employment of the plaintiff prima facie...

...stated in Ayera v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 17 Iowa, pp. 191, 192. There was certainly evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that the defendant had waived proofs signed ly the hand of the plaintiff, and the jury having so found we are not disposed to disturb...

...all the lumber called for was furnished by the defendant. Upon the above evidence, the judge ruled that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding a verdict for the plaintiff; and directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff alleged exceptions....

...that, according to law and according to the contract, the assessment in question was legal and valid. The plaintiff further contends, that the Superior...and reinstated him as a member of the association. This was a waiver of these several forfeitures. But there is no evidence to show that the defendant...

...to law and according to the contract of the parties, the assessment in question was legal and valid. The plaintiff further contends that the superior court...that the defendant had waived the provisions of the contract, rendering them void upon failure to pay the assessments within thirty days. The evidence...

...out by the porter and had not been seen again prior to his attack on the plaintiff". The court held that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that the company had been guilty of negligence ; this on the ground that no violated duty was shown. The rule...

...drawn. In view of these facts, we are quite clear that the learned judge below was correct in saying that there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that the plaintiff's intestate was free from contributory negligence, and for that reason the judgment must...

...duty of the court to rule, as matter of law, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, because there was no evidence which would warrant the jury in finding that she was in the exercise of due care. It is to be observed, in the view which is now to be taken of...