Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

and decreed, that said decision be affirmed; and it is further or dered, adjudged and decreed, that the claim of the appellees be confirmed to the tract of land known as “Rincon de San Francisquito," being the same on which appellees now reside, and bounded and described as follows, viz: On the northwardly side by the rancho of Doña Antonia Mesa, by the land of Don Antonio Buelna, and by that of Doña Guadalupe Briones; on the west side by the range of hills from the land of said Guadalupe Briones to the point known as "Arastradero;" on the south side by said "Arastradero" until it reaches the land of Francisco Estrada; and thence by said Estrada's north line to the east end of the same; and on the east side by the bay to the south line of the rancho of said Antonia Mesa, first mentioned, at the southeast corner thereof. The limits of the land hereby confirmed to be subject to the settlement and location of the said line of the ranchos and lands above mentioned as the same have been defined and settled by juridical survey, or as the same have been defined and settled under confirmations by the said board of commissioners and by this court, as, in default of both, as the same were understood and settled at the time of the grant of the premises hereby confirmed to José Peña on the 29th day of March, 1841. Reference to be had to said grant, and also to the map or plan of said premises on file in this case, attached to and forming a part of the traced copy of the espediente, duly certified from the office of the United States surveyor general for California.

OGDEN HOFFMAN,

Endorsed: Filed October 29th, 1855.

U. S. Dist. Judge.

JOHN A. MONROE, Clerk. By W. H. CHEVERS, Deputy.

Order Granting Appeal.

At a stated term of the district court of the United States of America for the northern district of California, held, at the courtroom, in the city of San Francisco, on Tuesday, the twenty-fourth day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-seven.

Present, the Honorable Ogden Hoffman, district judge.
THE UNITED STATES

VS.

TEODORO AND SECUNDINO ROBLES.

D. C. 81.-L. C. 200.

In this case, on application of the United States attorney, made in open court, it is ordered by the court that an appeal in behalf of the United States from the final decision of this court, rendered at the present term, be, and the same is hereby, granted; and that a certified transcript of the pleadings, evidence, depositions and pro

ceedings in the said cause be sent to the Supreme Court of the United

States without delay.

Endorsed: Filed March 24th, 1857.

JOHN A. MONROE, Clerk. By W. H. CHEVERS, Deputy.

Order Granting Appeal.

At a stated term of the district court of the United States of America for the northern district of California, held at the courtroom, in the city of San Francisco, on Wednesday, the thirtieth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-eight.

Present, the Honorable Ogden Hoffman, district judge.

THE UNITED STATES

AND

V.

TEODORO AND SECUNDINO ROBLES.

D. C. 81.-L. C. 200.

In this case, on application of P. Della Torre, esq., U. S. attorney, it is ordered that an appeal in behalf of the United States from the final decision of the court, rendered in said court at the June, 1855, term, be, and the same is hereby, granted; and that a certified transcript of the pleadings, evidence, depositions and proceedings in the said cause be sent to the Supreme Court of the United States without delay, and the appellants are ordered to serve the usual citation according to law.

OGDEN HOFFMAN, Dist. Judge.

Endorsed: Filed July 1st, 1858.

W. H. CHEVERS, Clerk.

United States of America to Teodoro and Secundino Robles, greeting: You are hereby cited and admonished to be and appear at a Supreme Court of the United States, to be holden in Washington on the first Monday in December next, pursuant to an order of appeal granted on this thirtieth day of June, A. D. 1858, in open court, by the district judge of the district court of the United States for the northern district of California, in a certain suit, wherein the United States are plaintiffs and you are defendant, on appeal, to show cause, if any there be, why the decision in the said appeal mentioned should not be corrected, and speedy justice should not be done to the parties in that behalf.

Witness my hand and seal, at San Francisco, this thirtieth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-eight. OGDEN HOFFMAN, [SEAL.] U. S. Dist. Judge.

Endorsed: Due service of copy within admitted this 2d day of July, 1858. J. CLARKE, Att'y for Clmt.

Filed July 2, 1858.

W. H. CHEVERS, Clerk.

I, W. H. Chevers, clerk of the district court of the United States for the northern district of California, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing pages, numbered from one to forty, both inclusive, contain a full, true, and correct transcript of the record from the board of U. S. land commissioners, and of the pleadings, opinion, decree, orders and citation in this court filed in this office in the case of The United States, appellants, v. Teodoro and Secundino Robles, appellees.

'In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court, this third day of July, A. D. 1858, [SEAL.] and of our independence the 82d.

Filed 2d August, 1858.

W. H. CHEVERS, Clerk.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.

No. 191.

THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS,

VS.

MARIA MANUELA VALENCIA.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT U. S. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

G. S. GIDEON, Printer, 511 Ninth street, Washington, D. C.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »