Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana

Athon, Connecticut Mutual Life
Ins. Co. et al. v............
10
Aurora, City of, et al. v. Fox et al. 1
Axtell, Shoemaker v..................561
Baddeley v. Patterson
Bales et al., Cates v........... ...285
Balliett v. Humphreys.........
..........388

Becker v. Denmure......

Bender, Hillegass, Adm'r, v........225

Benson, Adm'r, v. Liggett..

.157

Benson, Adm'r, v. Liggett.

Bingaman et al., Uhl v........

Binkley, McClellan et al. v.........503

Bishop, Hall et al. v.................. .370
Board of Comm'rs of Henry Co.,
Hackleman v.

.601

Cole v. Matchett et al...........
Coleman v. Coleman et al...........344
Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co.
et al. v. Athon..........

Copple et al. v. Lee....................

Cornelius, Suman et al. v............506

Cox et al. v. Albert et al..
Crabbs et al., Wright et al. v......487
Craig et al. v. Encey..

.241

..141

Burroughs v. Adams et al........ .160

Bowen v. Roach et al................................... .361

Bramblett, Rodenbarger v..........213

Brown et al. v. Eagle Creek and

Little White Lick G. R. Co. et al.421

Brown et al. v. State, ex rel. Field..239

Brown et al., Howe Machine Co. v.209

Browning et al. v. Hight............257

Buckeye Engine Co. et al., Mor-

ris v........

Butler University, White et al. v..585

Carr, Trustee, Webb v........... ..455

Caskey v. City of Greensburgh et

al......

Cates v. Bales et al....

.233

.285

David, McFadin v............

Davis v. Fogg et al........

Davis, Adm'r, et al., Stapp, Adm'r,

V.........

Day v. School City of Huntington.280
De Bolt, Lawson et al. v...
Denmure, Becker v...
Dill et al. v. Vincent....
Donnell, Anderson v............
Douglass et al. v. Keehn............199

Eagle Creek and Little White Lick
G. R. Co. et al., Brown et al. v..421

Eagle Machine Works, Richard-

.422

Easter v. Fleming et al............116

.....119

.449

Fell et al. v. Muller..................507
Ferguson et al., Shaw, Adm'r, v...547
Firestone v. Firestone...
.534
First National Bank of Evansville
et al., Ridgeway et al. v.........
First National Bank of Madison,
Turner et ux. v.......

Fitzer, Louthain v.....

Flanagan et al., Daggett v..... .253

Flanagan v. Patterson, Adm'r.....514

Fleming et al., Easter v.......... .116

Fogg et al., Davis v.................

.301

Fogg et al., Frisbie et al., Trus-

tees of Clarksville, v..

.269

Fox et al., City of Aurora et al. v. 1

Frisbie et al., Trustees of Clarks-

ville, v. Fogg et al.....................................................

.269

Gabe, McGinnis et al. v.............457

Gerard et al. v. Jones, Adm'r......378

Gibson, Johnson v.................

Goldsmith, Wagner v.

Goss et al. v. Meadors, Guardian..528

Gray et al. v. State, ex rel. Mills.. 68

Greer, Epstein v................................ ..........348

Green v. Weever......

.494

Greensburgh, City of, et al., Cas-
key v.....

.282
..517

.233
.182

Griffin, Albright et al. v........

Grubaugh v. Jones, Adm'r.........350

Hackleman v. Board of Comm'rs
of Henry Co............ ..........162

Hadley et al., McMillan et al. v..590

Hagaman, Neff v..

Haines et al. v. Allen et al.........100

Hall et al. v. Bishop...............................................370

Hamilton et al. v. Huntley et al..521
Hampson, Wrape et al. v......... .499
Harvey et al., Ricketts v............152
Harvey, Uhl v.....

.133

..316

..332

282

..110

Johnson v. Gibson......
Johnson, Supreme Lodge, Knights
of Honor of the World, v.

Jones, Adm'r, Gerard et al. v......378

Jones, Adm'r, Grubaugh v.........350

Jones et ux. v. McElwee.......

Jones et ux. v. Parks et al.....

Jones, Hatton, Ex'r, v.

Jones v. State, ex rel. Dellinger...217

Julian v. Hoosier Drill Co. et al..408

..602

.537

..466

.445

Martens v. Rawdon et al............ 85
Matchett et al., Cole v...
......601

McCarty et al., McGrew et al. v...496

McClellan et al. v. Binkley.........503

McElwee, Jones et ux. v............602

McFadin v. David........

McGinnis et al. v. Gabe.............457

McGirr, City of Richmond et al. v.192

McGrew et al. v. McCarty et al...496

McMillan et al. v. Hadley et al...590

McWhorter, American Ins. Co. v..136

Meadors, Guardian, Goss et al. v..528

Meier, Leary. v..........

Meyer v. Morris.....

Mitchell et al. v. Lincoln, Adm'r..531

Moak, Erb v.........................
........569
Morris v. Buckeye Engine Co. et al. 86
Morris, Meyer v.......
Mountjoy v. State......
..203 | Muller, Fell et al. v...

Hatton, Ex'r, v. Jones....... .466

Hazzard v. Vickery et al................................ 64

Hight, Browning et al. v. 257

Hillegass, Adm'r, v. Bender........225

Hoagland et ux., Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St.

.157

.384
..439

.203

Louis R. W. Co. v. Laufman...319
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St.

Louis R. W. Co. v. Yundt et ux.373

Porter et al., Roberts et al. v......130

Pressell, American Ins. Co. of Chi-

cago V.................

.442

Rawdon et al., Martens v........... 85

Reed v. Whitton
Richardson v. Eagle Machine
Works

Richmond, City of, et al. v. McGirr.192

Richmond, City of, Jett v......

Ricketts v. Harvey et al........

Ridgeway et al. v. First National

Bank of Evansville et al.........119

Roach et al., Bowen v.............

Roberts et al. v. Porter et al........130

Robertson v. Terre Haute and In-

dianapolis R. R. Co.......

Rodenbarger v. Bramblett... 213

Rogers v. Western Union Tele-
graph Co........

State, Parker v....
State, Schmidt v......
State, ex rel. Cox et al., Rogers et
State, Stout v....

.492

al. v
....329

State, ex rel. Dellinger, Jones v...217

State, ex rel. Field, Brown et al. v.239

State, ex rel. Mills, Gray et al. v.. 68
State, ex rel. Woods, Kane et al. v.103
State, ex rel. Wysor, Leech v......570
Stocker, Adm'r, Wilborn et al. v..602
Stout v. State.....

.492

.175

..506

Stringer et al., Adams v.......
Suman et al. v. Cornelius....................
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor
of the World, v. Johnson.......................110

Teal v. Langsdale........

Terre Haute and Indianapolis R.

R. Co., Everhart v.......

Terre Haute and Indianapolis R.

R. Co., Robertson v..

Thompson, Ross v..

Timmons v. Wiggins...

..474