 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 782 halaman
...breach of a contract of sale by a refusal by the purchaser to take the goods is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of the breach, with interest; citing 2 Suth. Dam. 359; Brownlee v. Bolton, 44 Mich. 218; Cohen v. Platt, 69... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 832 halaman
...• AGES. For failure to deliver goods as agreed, the measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of delivery. Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Submitted October 10, 1906. (Docket No. 48.) Decided November... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1857 - 722 halaman
...vendor and vendee. (7 Hill. 74. Dey v. DOT, 9 Wend. 129. 2 Barn. fy Cress. 629.) The difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of delivery is the measure of damages in all cases of sale of merchantable commodities between vendor... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 halaman
...D. Pratt and Daniel P. Baldwin, for appellee. Counsel for appellants argued: The difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of delivery is the measure of damages, whether the article was paid for in advance or not. Startup v.... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1869 - 658 halaman
...the breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of personal property, is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place fixed for delivery, Boies & Barrett v. Vincent. Appeal from Washington District Court. FINDINGS OF... | |
 | William Wetmore Story - 1871 - 784 halaman
...general rule is, that where the vendee has not paid for the goods in advance, the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of the promised delivery is the rule of damages. This goes upon the ground that the injured party is thereby... | |
 | Lewis Hamilton Bond, United States. Courts of Justice. Circuit Courts - 1872 - 694 halaman
...purchaser, by reason of the non-delivery of the iron thus lost, the rule of damage is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of the delivery. 1b. 6. Where it is stipulated in a contract that certain acts are to be done or omitted, and the contract... | |
 | 1920 - 496 halaman
...action against seller for failure to deliver goods, the measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of delivery with interest. — Seward v Pennsylvania Salt Mfg. Co., Pa.. 109 Atl. 617. 93. Lapse of Contract.... | |
 | Ohio, George E. Seney - 1874 - 896 halaman
...refusing to accept the hogs when duly tendered : Held, the rule of damages is the difference between the contract price and -the market value at the time and place of delivery. Nixon v. Nixon, 21 Ohio State, 114. 21. COVENANT. — The rule of damages upon a covenant... | |
 | 1920 - 516 halaman
...the seller to deliver goods having a market value, the measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place where they should have been delivered. — Cherry v. L J. Upton & Co.. NC, 103 SK 912. 73.- Loss in... | |
| |
... the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time and place of delivery. 
