and many others, are represented in the pages of

LITTELL'S LIVING AGE.

In 138 THE LIVING AGE enters upon the forty-first year of its publication. It has constantly received the warm commendation and support of the best men and journals of the country, and has met with un interrupted success. A WEEKLY MAGAZINE of sixty-four pages, it gives more than

Three and a Quarter Thousand double-column octavo pages of reading-matter yearly, forming four large volumes. It presents in an inexpen sive form, considering its great amount of matter, with freshness, owing to its weekly issue, and with a satisfactory completeness attempted by no other publication, the best Essays, Reviews, Criticisms, Tales, Sketches of Travel and Discovery, Poetry, Scientific, Biographical, Historical, and Political Information from the entire body of Foreign Periodical Literature.

During the coming year Serial and Short Stories by the Leading Foreign Authors will be given, together with an amount

Unapproached by any other Periodical in the world, of the most valuable Literary and Scientific matter of the day, from the pens of the foremost Essayists, Scientists, Critics, Discoverers, and Editors, above named and many others, representing every department of Knowledge and Progress.

The importance of THE LIVING AGE to every American reader, as the only satisfactorily fresh and complete compilation of a generally inaccessible but indispensable current literature - indispensable because it embraces the productions of

THE ABLEST LIVING WRITERS in all branches of Literature, Science, Art and Politics-is sufficiently indicated by the following recent Opinions.

"THE LIVING AGE flourishes in even more than youthful vigor. It is the most valuable treasury of foreign periodical literature existing. It has become indispensable."- New York Observer.

"From the first it has sustained the highest character.. Its readers are supplied with the best literature of the day. There is nothing noteworthy in science, art, literature, blography, philosophy, or religion, that cannot be found in it. It gives in accessible form the best thought of the ago." - The Churchman, New York.

"It becomes more and more necessary, as well as valuable, as the field of periodical literature broadens.. It has no peer."-Zion's Herald, Boston.

"It stands easily at the head of its class, and deserves its prosperity."-The Congregationalist, Boston.

Among all miscellaneous literature we know of no equal to THE LIVING AGE for variety of information, depth of interest, and purity of tone. Its pages are sufficient to keep any reader abreast with the best printed thoughts of the best of our contemporary writers.. It is the great eclectic of the world."-Episcopal Register, Philadelphia.

"It stands quite at the head of its class of magazines. The ablest essays and reviews of the day are to be found here."-The Presbyterian, Philadelphia.

"It is one of the best investments of the age.. It enables its readers to keep fully abreast of the best thought and literature of civilization."- Christian Advocate, Pittsburgh.

"No other periodical gives so diversified a view of current literature, not by abridgments, but by publishing entire the best essays, criticisms, discussions, short stories, and serial romances of the day.. It is for readers of limited leisure or purse the most convenient and available means of possessing themselves of the very best results of current criticism, philosophy, science, and literature."-Presbyterian Banner, Pittsburgh. "It is simply invaluable, bringing to us as it does, week by week, the very cream of all the current literature of the day."-The Living Church, Chicago.

"Words commendatory of THE LIVING AGE are like adjectives applied to fine gold."-Christian Leader, Boston. "It is a visitor that is always the more welcome the longer it comes."- Christian at Work, New York.

"The best and freshest thoughts of the day are sure of a place in its pages, and whatever there is of interest in the literary and scientific world is spread before its readers."- Boston Journal.

"No other periodical can compare with it in interest and value."-Boston Traveller.

"Every year strengthens its hold upon popular favor. Every one of its fifty-two numbers brings something which one must real to know what is being thought of and talked of.. It is indispensable in every household where any attempt is made to keep up with the current thought of the day."-Hartford Courant.

"Foremost of the eclectic periodicals"-N.. World. "No reader who makes himself familiar with its contents can lack the means of a sound literary culture."New York Tribune.

"It is edited with great skill and care, and its weekly appearance gives it certain advantages over its monthly rivals."-Albany Argus.

"It more than holds its own in the face of all rivals, and that solely on account of its intrinsic merits.". Philadelphia Times.

"Through its pages alone, it is possible to be as well informed in current literature as by the perusal of a long list of monthlies."-Philadelphia Inquirer.

"A repository of choice reading-matter presented in a form and at a cost which combine to make it one of the most popular of American publications. The range is a wide one, embracing history, science, fiction, travel, and every department of literature."-Troy Times. "It furnishes a complete compilation of an indispensable literature."- Chicago Evening Journal.

"As much in the forefront of eclectic publications as at its start forty years ago."-Cincinnati Gazette. "Remarkably cheap for the quality and amount of reading furnished."-Montreal Gazette.

"It affords the best, the cheapest, and most convenient means of keeping abreast with the progress of thought in all its phases"-North American, Philadelphia.

"It seems to increase in excellence as it grows older." -Milwaukee Republican-Sentinel.

"It is by odds the best periodical in the world.. It has no rival; it stands alone in its excellence."- Morning Star, Wilmington, N. C.

PUBLISHED WEEKLY at $8.00 a year, free of postage. 4TO NEW SUBSCRIBERS for the year 1884, remitting before Jan. 1, the weekly numbers of 1883 issued after the receipt of their subscriptions, will be sent gratis.

CLUB PRICES FOR THE BEST HOME AND FOREIGN LITERATURE. ["Possessed of LITTELL'S LIVING AGE,' and of one or other of our vivacious American monthlies, a subscriber will find himself in command of the whole situation."- Philadelphia Evening Bulletin.] For $10.50, THE LIVING AGE and any one of the four-dollar monthly magazines (or Harper's Weekly or Bazar) will be sent for a year, with postage prepaid on both; or, for $9.50, THE LIVING AGE and the St. Nicholas or Lippincott's Monthly, postpaid.

ADDRESS

LITTELL & CO., 31 Bedford St., Boston.

DEC 201950

THE

NEW ENGLANDER.

No. CLXXVIII.

JANUARY, 1884.

ARTICLE I-THE U. S. SUPREME COURT AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT.

THE decision of the Supreme Court of the United States at the October term, 1883, adverse to the constitutionality of sections one and two of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, while quietly acquiesced in by the people in general, has created no small agitation among our colored citizens. They have held numerous meetings in the larger cities to express their sorrow and indignation, and at these meetings have been present many of their old-time friends, who were connected with the antislavery cause. For then, as now, an indignant protest was made, in the name of God and humanity, against caste, whether in India or America. Some, who were not in that renowned conflict, but have come upon the stage in the years since the war, have mistakenly said, that the old abolitionists warred only for the overthrow of slavery, and that their opinions and advice on the subject of the rights of the free colored people should now have little weight, when uttered against

the extreme views which are occasionally presented by colored men. But in that conflict caste and slavery were equally opposed, on the platform and in the pulpit, by resolutions adopted in anti-slavery conventions and by articles in the newspapers, through tracts and through books. Especially was there a continual quotation of the indignant words of James in the second chapter of his epistle, to condemn the unchristian prejudice against those of African blood, which made distinctions insulting to them in the very house of God, and at the Lord's own table! Slavery was at a distance, in the southern States; but caste was all around them, and they could not and did not forbear to rebuke it. The writer may be allowed, in illustration, to refer to his own experience on this very point. His direct and practical protest against caste began, in his college and theological seminary days, at the Presbyterian church, in New York city, which he was accustomed to attend. He often went and sat with the colored people in the seats to which they were confined in one end of the gallery, to express his sympathy with them, and to rebuke their exclusion from other parts of the house. While he was a pastor in Hartford, Connecticut, in the year 1847, he learned that no minister in the city had exchanged pulpit services with Rev. Dr. Pennington, of the colored Congregational church-a very black brother, as regarded the skin, but who was held in high esteem for his modesty and excellent good sense, and on whom, when he went abroad to a reform convention in London, the University of Göttingen, in Germany, on the recommendation of friends, bestowed the honorary degree of Doctor of Divinity. So the writer arranged an exchange with him, and the congregation were astonished one Sunday, to see Dr. Pennington's dark face in the pulpit; a fact which led some of them indignantly to leave the house. A little later, in the annual election of Moderator of the Hartford Central Association of Ministers, he voted alone, on the first ballot, for Dr. Pennington; but there being no choice, and Dr. Bushnell coming to his aid on the second ballot, a majority was induced to vote in Dr. P.'s favor. Two young theologues, who appeared before the body at that meeting to be licensed to preach, were astounded to have the examination conducted, and their licenses finally signed by a

black clergyman; especially as one of them was going to the State of Tennessee! And at that very moment Dr. Pennington was a fugitive slave, having escaped, years before, from Maryland. After the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law, in 1850, he was in such fear of detection and recapture that he retired to Canada, while one of the writer's church members (John Hooker, Esq.), corresponded with the old master, succeeded in purchasing Dr. Pennington for a small sum (having a regular bill of sale made out to John Hooker), and then, before executing the paper of freedom, took a walk down Main street, in Hartford, for a few minutes, as he said, "just to know how it felt to own a Doctor of Divinity!" In those benighted days nothing so offended our northern communities as to see abolitionists treating colored people as they did white people, and insisting that all others should do the same. They looked with horror and detestation upon such conduct, and an act which now hardly attracts attention or produces a ripple of feeling, then aroused a tempest of indignation. This question of the rights of the African race, slave or free, is thus a very familiar one to the veterans in the anti-slavery war.

And so it was with intense interest that they learned of the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Civil Rights Act, and the colored people have their deepest sympathy in a natural feeling of alarm, as one of the trusted defences against insult and injury is suddenly leveled to the dust. To those of African descent it is a matter of personal concern, as it cannot be to others. The iron enters into their soul. Nor would it be strange or unpardonable if, in the excitement of the hour, some of them should, like Job in his agony, exceed the bounds of wisdom and of faith. It may not be without reason, then, that an old friend of the colored race offers his view of this decision so important to the American people. For it is really a case of national character, involving the reputation of our Supreme Court, and principles of law affecting many other interests than those immediately concerned; and it is only as it is broadly and calmly viewed that we can reach an intelligent and just judgment as to its merits. But before proceeding further it may be well to cite the sections declared unconstitutional. They read as follows:

SECTION 1. That all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the accommodations, facilities and privileges of inns, public conveyances on land or water, theatres and other places of public amusement; subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law, and applicable alike to citizens of every race and color, regardless of any previous condition of servitude.

SEC. 2. That any person who shall violate the foregoing section by denying to any citizen, except for reasons by law applicable to citizens of every race or color and regardless of any previous condition of servitude, the full enjoyment of any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges in said section enumerated, or by aiding or inciting such denial, shall for every such offense forfeit and pay the sum of five hundred dollars to the person aggrieved thereby, to be recovered in an action of debt, with full costs; and shall also for every such offense be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined not less than five hundred nor more than one thousand dollars, or shall be imprisoned not less than thirty days nor more than one year,

provided certain legal forms are to be observed, which the section proceeds to specify.

This legislation was supposed to be warranted by these words of the Amendments to the National Constitution:

ARTICLE XIII., Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Sec. 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

ARTICLE XIV., Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States, and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Sec. 5. Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Two general aspects of the subject will consecutively demand attention, and the two need to be carefully distinguished. First, we may consider what view we should take of the Supreme Court in connection with its decision as to the unconstitutionality of this part of the Civil Rights Act. Have we cause to assail the motives of that eminent body for its action