 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 halaman
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization, procured ex parte... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 halaman
...Pacific B. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1, 48-49: The general principle announced In numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...action, the right, question or fact once so determined most, as between the same parties or their privies, be taken as conclusively established, so long as... | |
 | 1920 - 496 halaman
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. — Lyons v. Empire Fuel Co., MSCCA, 262... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 halaman
...3 Sumn. 22, Fed. Cas. No. 8,146) and with reference to which the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that:...competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the second... | |
 | 1900 - 2044 halaman
...168 US 1-48, 18 Snp. Ct. 27, it is said that: "The general principle announced In numerous eases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent salt between the same parties or their privies: and, even if the second suit le for a different cause... | |
 | 1899 - 986 halaman
...the grounds upon which this salutary rule rests. The general principle announced In numerous cases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put In...different § cause of action, the right, question, or fact'once * so determined must, as between the same parties or their privies, be taken as conclusively... | |
 | 1904 - 906 halaman
...subject of res judioata are reviewed by Mr. Justice Harían, and the general doctrine thus stated: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or fheir privies; and even if the second suit is for 'a different cause of action, the right, question,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1912 - 838 halaman
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or then- privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization,... | |
 | 1922 - 1158 halaman
...Sup. Ct. 18, 42 L. Ed. 355, used this language: "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, ав а ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1913 - 1252 halaman
...decision must have the same faith and credit in all other states that it is entitled to in that state. "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...so determined must, as between the same parties or privies, be taken as conclusively established, so long as the judgment in the first suit remains unmodified."... | |
| |
The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between, the same... 
