Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

prevails, and that therefore the customs sanctioned by the majority, other things being equal, would be expected to be incorporated more or less into the people's political life. But specific constitutional limitations, designed for the protection of the minority, are obviously entitled to more weight than either legislation or general custom. And if the letter and the spirit of our constitutional guarantees require the subsidence of custom, even though so valuable or, as many consider, so necessary a book as the Bible lose its place in schools supported by the State, the constitutional guaranty must be upheld.

Upon the general subject, Samuel T. Spear's Religion and the State (Dodd, Mead & Co., N. Y., 1876) may be read with profit.

Philadelphia.

A. H. WINTERSTEEN.

[Between the decision in Donahue v. Richards, by the Supreme Court of Maine in 1854 and that in Spiller v. Inhabitants, by the Massachusetts Court in 1866, (supra, page 323), there was the interesting case of Comm. v. Cooke, in the Police Court of Boston, in April, 1859, and reported 7 AMERICAN LAW REGISTER, O. S. 417. It was an assault and battery case, a teacher having whipped a boy for refusing to recite the Lord's prayer and the Ten Commandments. The School Committee required the pupils to learn, and once a week to recite, the Ten Commandments; the morning exercises were to begin, each day, by reading a portion of Scripture, followed by the Lord's Prayer.

The same arguments were advanced as received favorable consideration in the principal case (especially pages 301-3), and received this answer: "Those who drafted and adopted our Constitution could never have intended it to meet such narrow and sectarian views. That section of the Constitution was clearly intended for higher and nobler purposes.

*

* *

It was intended to prevent persecution by punishing for religious opinions. The Bible has long been in our common schools. It was placed there by our fathers, not for the purpose of teaching sectarian religion, but a knowledge of God and of his will, whose practice is religion. *** But, in doing this, no scholar is requested to believe it, none to receive it as the only true version of the laws of God." MAINE, J., pp. 422, 423.

[Space forbids the insertion at this place, of the various constitutional provisions in all of the States of the Union, but they will soon appear in connection with a leading article on The Constitutional Provisions Relative to Religion and the Deity, in which the action of the people in defining freedom for both the religious and the irreligious will be considered.

[The specific subject of Sunday laws and contracts, with reviews of the legislation and judicial opinions upon the cases arising from violations thereof, has been treated in two leading articles in The RegisteR: one by J. H. Lind in N. S., Vol. XVII, page 281, and the other by Angelo T. Freedley in N. S., Vol. XIX, pages 137, 209, 273.-ED.]

ABSTRACTS OF RECENT DECISIONS.

BANKS AND BANKING.

Deposit of collaterals with a bank for the purpose of securing certain loans and discounts, does not render the bank a gratuitous bailee, but it is liable for the want of ordinary and reasonable care in the custody of the securities so deposited, until they are redelivered to the owner. Ouderkirk v. Central Nat. Bank, Ct. App. N. Y., Feb. 25, 1890.

Holder of check cannot sue the bank on which it is drawn, unless it has been accepted by the latter, but where the bank has paid the amount of a check to one who is neither the payee nor indorsee, and has charged it up to the account of the drawer, the bank's conduct amounts to such acceptance as will enable the holder to sue upon the check. Pickle v. People's Nat. Bank, S. Ct. Tenn., Jan. 16, 1890.

Knowledge by president of a bank of equities affecting certain notes of a cattle company, in which he is interested, which notes he offers for discount to the directors of the bank, without disclosing the facts, is not imputable to the bank and will not affect the validity of its claim upon the notes. Corcoran v. Snow Cattle Co., S. Jud. Ct. Mass., Feb. 26, 1890.

Raised check was indorsed "for collection" and given to a third party to collect from the bank on which it was drawn; the agent of the former indorsed the check in his own name and the money was paid to such agent and remitted by him who had sent the check for collection before the forgery was discovered; the bank could not recover back from the principal the amount of the check. Nat. City Bank of Brooklyn v. Westcott, Ct. App. N. Y., 2d Div., Feb. 25, 1890.

BILLS AND NOTES.

Attorney's fee of ten per cent., when stipulated for in a promissory note, may be recovered, together with the face value of the note, and it is not necessary to prove the value of the attorney's services. Exchange Bank of Dallas v. Tuttle, S. Ct. N. M., Jan. 24, 1890.

Contribution cannot be exacted by a surety upon a promissory note from his co-sureties, when the note has been renewed by a new note signed by the principal and the first mentioned surety alone, and the latter has been compelled to pay such new note. Bell v. Boyd, S. Ct. Tex., Feb. 25, 1890.

Possession by widow of an unindorsed note, payable to her husband, who owed her money, is not sufficient to establish her right to the note as against his executor, and a renewal note, given by the maker of the original note to the widow in her own name, is the property of the estate. Buie v. Buie, S. Ct. Miss., March 10, 1890.

Sale of drafts by one to whom they have been indorsed in blank for the purpose of collection, vests a good title in the purchaser, although the agent has falsely represented that he owned the drafts and has failed to account for the proceeds. Coors v. German Nat. Bank, S. Ct. Colo., Feb. 28, 1890.

COMMON Carriers.

Butter received by a railroad in summer for shipment South, must be shipped in such manner as to prevent injury by heat, and the railroad's liability is not altered by the fact that it has no refrigerator cars. Beard v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., S. Ct. Iowa, Feb. 10, 1890.

CONSTITUTIONAL Law.

Territorial statute, prohibiting the exportation of fish from the territory, is an interference with interstate commerce, and consequently void. Territory v. Evans, S. Ct. Id., Feb. 24, 1890.

CONTRACTS.

Agreement to sell a brand of cigars to no one in the State except the other party to the contract, and to give him the exclusive agency for such cigars, is not void as being in restraint of trade. Newell v. Meyendorff, S. Ct. Mont., Feb. 4, 1890.

CORPORATIONS.

Unpaid instalments upon the capital stock of a corporation, do not, in the absence of a special contract, give the corporation a lien upon the stock for the amount unpaid. Lankershime Ranch Land and Water Co. v. Herberger, S. Ct. Cal., Jan. 27, 1890.

CRIMINAL LAW.

Larceny at common law is constituted where a broker, by falsely representing to the consignee of goods that he has secured a purchaser therefor, obtains a delivery order on the carrier, gives the consignee a memorandum containing a fictitibus contract of sale on the consignee's account, takes possession of the goods and stores them in his own name, and a sale by him to another than the alleged purchaser passes no title. Soltau v. Gerdau, Ct. App. N. Y., Feb. 25, 1890.

DIVORCE.

Cruel treatment by a husband of his wife, which renders her existence intolerable and endangers her life, is not excused by the fact that such treatment is the result of the habitual intoxication of the husband, unless the wife herself has induced or consented to such intoxication. McVickar v. McVickar, Ct. Ch. N. J., Feb. 21, 1890.

Excessive use of morphine by means of hypodermic injections, is not drunkenness within the meaning of a statute which makes habitual drunkenness a cause for divorce. Youngs v. Youngs, S. Ct. Ill., Nov. 26, 1889.

FIRE INSURANCE.

Assignment of a fire insurance policy to a mortgagee was written by the agent who had solicited the insurance, upon the policy being brought to him by the insured and the mortgagee, and was subsequently approved by the company; afterwards the insured sold the property, and again called to get the policy transferred to

the same mortgagee, but was informed by the agent that such transfer was unnecessary; the company was estopped to set up the non-transfer of the policy on the sale of the property as a defense to an action by the mortgagee. Phænix Assurance Co. v. Wachter, S. Ct. Pa., Feb. 24, 1890.

By-law of a mutual fire insurance company, the effect of which is to limit the company's liability on certain insured property, is binding upon a member of the company who receives a copy of such by-law and makes no objection to it, but continues his membership in the company. Borgards v. Farmers' Mut. Ins. Co., S.

Ct. Mich., Feb. 20, 1890.

Giving possession to lessee of insured property, under a contract that he shall buy the property at the termination of the lease, or, at his option, at any time during its continuance, is a breach of a condition that the policy shall become void if any change takes place in the title or possession of the property insured, without notice to, and the consent of, the insuring company. Smith v. Phenix Ins. Co., S. Ct. Cal., March 10, 1890.

Wilful false statement in a proof of loss, rendered after the fire, of some pretended losses, will forfeit the entire policy, which provides that "" any fraud, or attempt at fraud, or any false swearing on the part of the assured, shall cause a forfeiture of all claims,'' -even though the actual losses may exceed the entire amount of the policy. Dolloff v. Phoenix Ins. Co., S. Jud. Ct. Me., Jan. 20, 1890.

JURORS.

Member of Mormon Church cannot be a juror in Idaho, for jurors must have all the qualifications prescribed for electors. Territory v. Evans, S. Ct. Id., Feb. 24, 1890.

LIBEL.

Caricature in a newspaper, purporting to be a design for a monument to a member of the Legislature and capable of no meaning, except that liquor and money were the sources of his success in passing a certain bill, is libelous per se, and no innuendo is required. Randall v. Evening News Assn., S. Ct. Mich., Jan. 24, 1890.

[ocr errors]

Name mentioned in an alleged libelous newspaper article was John F which was the actual name of the person claiming to have been libeled, but such person was generally known as John D. F- and had adopted the middle letter for the express purpose of distinguishing him from other persons of the name of John F; in the absence of evidence that he was the person intended to be referred to in the article, recovery cannot be had. Finnegan v. Detroit Free Press Co., S. Ct. Mich., Dec. 28, 1889.

LIFE INSURANCE.

Assignment of policy, absolute on its face, by a debtor to his creditor, passes no greater interest to the latter than such sum as will pay the debt, with interest, and whatever premiums may have been paid by the creditor, with interest on the same. Cawthorn v. Perry, S. Ct. Tex., March 4, 1890.

Master and Servant.

Carpenter, porter and stewardess of a steamship, all of whom have signed shipping articles, are fellow-servants, though the former belongs to that division of the ship's company known as the "deck department," and the latter two to the "steward's department,” such divisions being made merely for convenience of administration and the captain being in command of the whole. Quebec Steamship Co. v. Merchant, S. Ct. U. S., March 3, 1890

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS.

Injuries to a pedestrian, received by him without fault on his part, through stumbling over a hydrant owned by a private company, which a city has allowed to be maintained upon its sidewalk in a position dangerous to travelers, will entitle him to recover damages against the city. King v. City of Oshkosh, S. Ct. Wis., Jan. 28, 1890.

MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE.

Insanity is such “sickness or other disability" as will entitle a member of a mutual benefit association to receive benefits. McCullough v. Expressman's Mut. Ben. Assn., S. Ct. Pa., March 10, 1890.

NEGLIGENCE.

Contributory negligence cannot be charged to one, who, having been placed through the negligence of another in a position of danger, does not exercise coolness and presence of mind in his endeavors to escape from such danger. Silver Cord Combination Mining Co. v. McDonald, S. Ct. Colo., Feb. 28, 1890.

NOTARY PUBLIC.

A woman cannot be appointed a notary public under the laws of Massachusetts. Opinion of the Justices, S. Jud. Ct. Mass., March 18, 1890.

OYSTERS.

Natural oyster-bed, as distinguished from artificial, is one not planted by man, in any shoal, reef or bottom where oysters are to be found growing, not sparsely or at intervals, but in a mass or stratum, and in sufficient quantities to be valuable to the public. State v. Willis, S. Ct. N. C., Jan. 14, 1890.

PUBLIC OFFICERS.

Habitual drunkenness, when made by constitutional provision a ground of removal from office, is chargeable to an officer who has been drinking to excess six or eight times a year, at intervals of from one to two months, for over three years, and whose fits of intoxication lasted from one to two days, and once for two or more weeks. State v. Savage, S. Ct. Ala., Feb. 1, 1890.

RAILROADS.

Child, ten years of age, who was lying across a railroad track

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »