| United States. Supreme Court - 1963 - 700 halaman
...'Establishment' Clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare - 1963 - 1628 halaman
...the 'EstabClause doei not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions. In many instances, the Congress or state legislatures conclude that the general welfare of society,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1964 - 648 halaman
...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1964 - 200 halaman
...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1966 - 920 halaman
...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance - 1983 - 708 halaman
...controlling weight to the preferential effect of the statute, however, reasoning that a tax provision "'does not violate the Establishment Clause merely...harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions.'" Citing Gillette v. United States, 401 US 437 (1971), which allowed draft deferment benefits to opponents... | |
| |