Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

resolutions which would cast a slur upon her honour.

Mr. HARRISON said that viewing the fact that we are about to build a great inter-oceanic railway, in which work we were expecting to receive Imperial aid, it would be short-sighted policy to pass a resolution of this kind. The hon. gentleman who introduced it had said that the subject was an unpleasant one. He quite concurred with the hon. gentleman in that opinion, and he would ask why introduce unpleasant subjects for discussion, in this House, if no good were to arise from the discussion. (Hear, hear). He quite agreed with the mover of the resolution with regard to Canada possess ing a good claim for these Fenian outrages, and whenever he had occasion to say any thing in the House upon the subject he had always asserted that these expeditions were simply and solely outrages of the worst kind, and that they were breaches of International law, and that it was a wrong against the country to have permitted these men openly to band themselves together in the United States with out any disposition having been shown to keep them in check or to prevent them injuring life and property in this country. He had always felt that when the United States Government did interfere, it was only when their interference was no longer required; and in those cases where they had arrested these marauders instead of punishing them, they had liberated them after a short imprisonment which was little more than a farce. Under these circumstances, he quite agreed that it was right for the Canadian Government to have brought under the attention of the Imperial Government the question of our right to compensation for these inroads. That was exactly what the Government had done. They had brought the matter before the Imperial Government in language that was strong and emphatic, and they had done all that was in its power in order to obtain redress. The hon. gen. tleman had said, however, that he did not by this resolution intend to blame the Imperial Government. Who then was to be blamed? If no one was to be blamed, if the resolution was to effect nothing, why had it been brought up for discussion at all. In fact it was neither more nor less than a censure of the Imperial Government. Well, if it would lead to the downfall of the Gladstone Government, he (Mr. Harrison) would support it with all his might. (Hear, hear). It was not pretended, however, that it would have that, or indeed any effect. The House knew that these claims had not been

withdrawn except for Government reasons, that it was not from cowardice or from any other unworthy motive. The Imperial Government had failed to press them. In taking the responsibility of withdrawing them, the Imperial Government admitted the right of Canada to compensa tion. While then we had a right to look to England for that compensation because she had taken the responsibility of preventing our seeking payment from the United States, it was our duty, remembering the motherly kindness of the people of England, to make the burthen lie as lightly upon them as possible. The mode of settlement proposed by the Government just met this condition. It gave us in Canada a great benefit, and it compensated us for our losses while it cost the Mother Country nothing at all. The mover of the resolution had objected to this settlement, saying England might as well pay the money as endorse paper for Canada. Well, he (Mr. Harrison) would not be above endorsing paper himself for Canada, (laughter) for he believed such an operation would not be only pleasant but entirely safe. It was impossible that the liability England was incurring would ever become an actual liability. As for Fenian marauders again troubling our country, he had no apprehensions on that score. Entertaining these views, first, that the resolution was more mischievous than useful, and, second, that it censured the Imperial Government when censure was out of place, he would move the following amendment :- That this House does not consider that the interests of the Dominion will be promoted or the relations now happily existing between the Mother Country strengthened, by an expression of opinion on the subject of the with drawal of the Fenian claims by the Imperial Government before the Joint High Commission.”

Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE thought that the hon. gentlemen opposite, acting in their capacities as representatives of the people and as the governing bodies of this country, had no hesitation in declaiming on the policy of the Imperial Government, for they had told them to their face that they disapproved of the course taken with regard to the Fenian claims. It seemed, however, to be considered quite right for the Canadian Government to censure the Imperial Government in the matter, but quite wrong for the House to give expression to its feeling as bearing hard upon the Imperial policy. He thought anything the Cabinet could do, the House also could by the expressions of individual members, and a clear ex

pression of public opinion which would be more justifiable than the expression of the Ministry in their individual capacity. The argument of the hon. member for Lanark was complete. except it begged the premises. He had said that the entire claims for the Fenian raids were consequential. The entire amount was not consequential but real and direct damages, and could be assessed as fairly as the loss of any vessel destroyed by the Alabama. Hon. Mr. MACDOUGALL-What are they?

Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE-There is an amount of $70,000 for goods destroyed and compensation due to the relatives of those who fell.

Hon. Mr. MACDOUGALL-I referred to those.

Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE-Yes, but not as direct damages. It was not, however, a mere question of money. He had always treated that as of much less conse quence than the continued irruptions into our country by these marauders, and the condonation of their offences. His hon. friend the member for West Toronto had said they all knew how our brave volun teers had come to the front when danger threatened; That was quite true; they came in 1866, for he (the speaker) was there as a volunteer with the rest, but they came back in 1870 and again in 1871, and they may come in 1872 or 1873. In consequence of the policy adopted towards these marauders, they are led to say "the United States will not imprison us, and if they do the courts will pardon us. The Government of Great Britain will snot insist upon the United States making any apology or reparation; and all that can happen will be that the Canadian Government will demand indemnity of the British Government," &c. This had a direct tendency to lead these people to continued incursions into our country. He was prepared to support a motion to go into Committee on this question. He did not care what shape the resolution took, but as long as the House had to deal with great expendi tures of money for irruptions by these marauders, and so long as our Commissioners took so wrong a ground as they seem to have taken, he considered the whole matter was one for discussion of this House.

Sir ALEXANDER GALT did not think the consideration of this subject would be mixed up with that of the Treaty, as had been said by several hon. members. It was, perhaps, unavoidable that one should be connected with the other, although the mover of the resolution was not res

|ponsible for the discussion having taken the direction it had. The question really was, whether this flouse, as representa tives of the people of Canada, had any right to express an opinion on a matter of Imperial policy. Upon that point. he thought the argument was wholly with his hon. friend the member for Lennox. As had been stated by the member for Lamb. ton, the Government had assumed the right to criticize the Imperial Government, and surely this House, which was the author of their power, had an equal right to criticise it. In truth the House was constantly expressing opinions upon Im. perial matters by passing addresses of congratulations and otherwise, and if it could congratulate in one case it must certainly have a right to censure in another, espe cially when it had reason to believe that Canadian interests had been neglected. Besides if the House did not express its opinions with regard to the withdrawal of these claims, the Imperial Government might assume that this country was satisfied; but so far from that being the case, a very strong feeling existed throughout the country that this was a matter which should have been urged strongly by the Home Government. That was the feeling when these outrages were committed, and however time might affect the popular sentiment there was still a strong conviction that Canada had claims which could not be overlooked. The action of the Commission was to forbear to press them, but he thought they had exceeded their duty when in addition to this they had given as a reason that they were of an indirect and inferential character. He presumed the reason they did that was to avoid establishing a prece dent for consequential damages in the Alabama case; but he did not think the cases were analogous, and at any rate the American Government had put in, and the British Government had allowed them to put in claims to cover the expenditure caused by fitting out cruisiers to pursue the Alabama. If the Canadian claims, therefore, had not been admitted, we had a right to expect that consequential claims arising from the Alabama would have been declared equally inadmissible. (Hear, hear). His own opinion was that the House should go into committee on the resolution of the hon. member for Lennox. He (Sir A. T. Galt) was not prepared to go to the full length of the resolution, but he was prepared to say that he regretted that the claims had been withdrawn, and was further prepared to say perhaps that some of these words might be modified, but he thought as an

expression of opinion that the resolutioning the opinion of Canada. He thought was only what was in the minds of every the motion, which he seconded, was a subone in this country less than two years ago. stantial motion to come up on this occaHe did not wish to go into any of the sion. He agreed with the member for the questions that might suggest them- Lambton that the proper time for dis selves in connection with the subject. cussion on the matter was when the Perhaps they would come up more pro- bill was under discussion. He could not perly when the Treaty itself was under agree with the hon. member for Terrediscussion. He did think when the coun- bonne as to the error of the Imperial try felt so deeply with regard to the Fe. Government in withdrawing the troops. nian claims, and when there was no assu. He thought they were bound to consider rance as to what would be done in the the Imperial interests, and so long as future if these raids were repeated, it Canada had the assurance that by mainwould be a subject of regret to the coun- taining a good and active militia, she will, try, if not to the House, if the matter should necessity arise, be supported by were left in the position in which it now the whole force of the Empire surely she stood. ought to be satisfied. When the Fenian raids occurred the Imperial troops in the country assisted to drive the marauders back at the expense of the Empire and would do so again should necessity arise. Pecuniary compensation being now the mode of settling all disputes and claims, he thought the Government were justified in the course they had taken.

Hon. Col. GRAY would not have risen had it not been for the remarks of his hon. friend from Sherbrooke. He had never read the history of Canada or of any public man with greater interest than he had heard the utterances of the hon. gen. tleman. When he was a member of the Government it was proposed to the Imperial Government to interfere in the course which the Government of Canada thought it best to pursue in the interests of this country; the hon. gentleman said that they would not adopt any course unless they were allowed to manage this country with reference to the interests of its people. If it was sound in us to adopt as principle that the Imperial Government could not interfere in any matter in which the interests of this country were solely concerned, he thought the same rule applied to us, when the Imperial Government decides upon a policy for the Empire. The hon. member for Lanark had put the question to the House in a clear and able manner. He then quoted the first resolution, to which he said the Im perial Government would reply that we had no right to pass it unless we were prepared to represent the Empire. The member for Lennox had said that it was not the opinion of the British people, but of the Government; but the Government represented the people, and whether we agree with Mr. Gladstone or not, so long as he commands a majority of the House of Commons, he must be taken to represent the people, and to speak for them. He thought that this Parliament had a perfect right to make representations to England, and there was no question which affected the interests of this country more than a general desire to have an under standing in reference to the Fenian raids in the past and assurances of their prevention in the future; but he doubted if the resolution of the hon. member for Lennox was the correct mode of express.

Mr. STREET thought it was to be regretted that this matter of the Fenian claims had not been strenuously urged. We all felt that a wrong had been done, and that it would be a cause for gladness if the American people, who had supported the Fenian movement, had been called to pay for the damage that had been done and that it would be a cause for gladness, if the American people, who had supported the Fenian movement, had been called to pay for the damage that had been done by those outrages. He did not, however, think it expedient at the present time to discuss the question of the withdrawal of these claims. The resolution was, in point of fact, a direct condemnation of the Government, and the people of England, and he did not think, under the circumstances, that it was one this House should pass. Holding these views it was his intention to support the amendment of his hon. friend, and he only hoped that the amendment would meet the approbation of the House. Of course the great question which was involved in this matter would come up for consideration at another time, when the House would be able to speak more fully than in discussing the subject piecemeal. Hear, hear).

Mr. MILLS said they had been told that the Fenian raids were made upon Ca nada from hostility to Great Britain, and that, because Great Britain controlled the matter, and should have pressed the United States for compensation, we must now look to the Mother Country for reparation. He thought the object of Canada should be to substantiate the posi

tion taken, and that the American Gov-portant to the parent state, would be a ernment should guarantee that they matter of vital importance to the younger would exercise diligence in the future; country. England was prepared, at almost but he considered that, by accepting a any sacrifice, to endeavour to arrange the money consideration from the Imperial whole of the questions on which they were Government, Canada would put it out of at issue with the United States. She her power to deal with any matter of the assumed the responsibility of instructing kind in the future. He referred to the the Commissioners to withdraw the claim acts of Southern refugees during the civil for Fenian losses rather than break up war in the United States, and the demand the whole negotiations, and leave her of the American Government for the extra relations in regard to this continent in dition of Barby and the St. Alban's raid- the same unfortunate position in which ers, and thought the Government should they before stood. By the act of reprehave demanded the extradition of O'Neil sentation of the claim, they committed after the Fenian invasion of Manitoba, He the Imperial character to it as just and knew that the Americans were afraid that legitimate; and by taking the responsisuch a demand would be made, as they bility of withdrawing that claim which felt that it could not be refused if made. was admitted, both by Lord Granville and He could not see on what ground the Mr. Gladstone, they were prepared to resolutions of the member for Lennox assume the consequences and provide could be opposed. It could not be ex- that Canada should not be precluded from pected that Canada would submit to Fe- compensation for injuries done to her. nian raids for the next 15 or 20 years be Was there in this anything that Canada cause England will endorse her paper. He could properly complain of? No; if there considered that the proposition of the Gov- ever was an act committed by the Imperial ernment was to sell the honour of the Government that deserved the confidence country for a certain consideration. and support of Canada it was the present. Hon. Dr. TUPPER thought a stranger The Government of Canada felt that they entering our legislative halls for the first had a right under the circumstances; in time would find a good deal of difficulty the first place that the Imperial Governin ascertaining the position of public ment should press for compensation on affairs by listening to the speeches of ho. the Government of the United States, gentlemen opposite. The least thing they which was done; and in the second, that would have expected, after listening to should that compensation not be obtained, the very animated address of the hon. they had a right to some reparation at the member for Lennox, would have been a hands of the Imperial Government. The frank, fair, manly statement of the facts as result of the application was stated by the they existed. What were they? Canada, Minister of Finance, viz: that Canada a dependency, and a very strong depend would receive compensation to the extent ency of the British Crown: Canada, a of $600,000 a year. If Canada had to go into country fostered through long years of the market for the large loan necessary to infancy and childhood to man's estate, carry out her great public works her credit was invaded by a wless band. must have sustained a rude shock; but Imperial Government expected that they instead of that she would go side by side would be prepared to strike in their own with England, and the result was the defence, as Canada did strike; but they saving he had named. Was it nothing to gave her the aid of the Imperial forces the taxpayers and people of Canada that at the expense of the Empire, and, having they could say, that, having suffered by given that aid, and driven back the inva❘ those lawless invasions, and England havders, they at future stages pressed a claiming, in the interest of the Empire, felt it for compensation to the country from whence the invasion came. The House need not be told, after the able exposition of the first minister, that England considered it to be of the greatest interest to Canada and the Empire that all questions of dispute between the two countries should be settled, and any one who heard that speech must be convinced that if there was one question more than another that rendered the parent state anxious for a settlement of matters, it was the conviction that a struggle between the two countries, however comparatively unim

The

unwise under the circumstances to press their claim-which she admitted as justthey were compensated to the extent of $600,000 a year? Were these the circum. stances under which the Parliament of Canada should say to the Imperial Government, "We think this is a time to censure you?" No; such a sentiment would receive a response whether inside or outside of the House. No man could be so lost to the interests of the country as to take such a view, and to say, "we do not wish imperial aid in the construction of our public works; we do not want any

partnership." It had been said by to approve but not condemn. He did the mover of the resolution that the not doubt that if any independent member action of England would tend to encour- had been rash enough to propose a motion age raids on Canada, but no rational to the effect that the withdrawal of the man could possibly accept such a state- Fenian claim was highly advantageous to ment. England has shown that she con- the interests of the country, hon. gentlesidered our claims just, but that, failing men would have denied it very properly; to obtain redress for us, she was prepared but there was to be no whisper of disap to discharge the obligation herself, and probation. He had shared the feeling to discharge it with no niggard hand, but that a debate on this subject would conin a way which, while it involved no pay. flict with the debate on the Treaty, and ment by her taxpayers, was none the less for that reason he would have given a valuable to Canada. Would such a guas silent vote but for the extraordinary rantee of protection as this encourage speeches and the extraordinary amend oppression? It had been alleged that ment proposed, that it should be decided another raid had already taken place; but that the interests of the Dominion would let it be compared with former ones. In not be promoted by an expression of the latter case the United States soldiers opinion of the withdrawal of the Imperial were employed to arrest the movement, claims. The fact was the mover and the prisoners, though at first released, of this amendment desired the matter were at the present moment under arrest to be given up altogether, because for a new trial. He had listened with he knew that an expression of opinion great pain to some of the remarks of the was sure to be unfavorable. The seconder member for Lennox, who had shown such of the amendment told them that in anxiety to assail the Imperial Govern matters in which the Empire acted for us, ment. It would have been much more we had not the right to speak. This, manly if the hon. member had brought however, could not be, for the Govern his motion forward as a direct attack ment of the day had told the Imperial on the Government of Canada, for the Government in pretty plain term what action of the Imperial Government was at they thought of the matter, whatever view the instance of the Canadian Govern- might be taken in the discussion of the ment, and, if there was any "ignomy," matter when the whole Treaty was before the term used by the member for Lennox, the House. The proposed amendment attached to the matter at all, it rested was one for which no one could vote who with the Government of Canada. The had a proper sense of the independence hon. member had made a bold, unfortu. and spirit of the country. They were not nate and ineffectual motion, and he had prepared to stultify themselves and decide only couched his motion in its present that they should not discuss a question of form because he knew that the Canadian such vital consequence. The leader of Government had the full confidence and the Government informed them that a support of the people, who would sustain great concession had been made by Great the manly attitude they had assumed, and Britain in raising her voice in protection had attempted to assail the Parliament of of our fisheries, and that she had a right England, 3,000 miles away. The remarks to cede the navigation of the St. Lawrence, of the hon. gentleman had implied that aye, and the soil of the country, aye, and Canada could not take care of herself. He the people of the country. As to the had cast an indelible slur on a force the Fenian matter, however, he would read to country might be proud of; and if any- the House what had been the action of the thing would tend to induce invasion, it Government in the matter, and stated was the utterance of the hon. gentleman that the expressions were such that had himself. Further than this, he attempted he used them he would have been greeted to tear down the credit of the country by with hisses, because, of course, all the saying that England might as well have loyalty was on the other side of the House. paid the money as put her name to the (Hear, hear.) He then read extracts from bond, and if the hon. gentleman's finan-printed papers laid before Parliament, to cial statements had any authority, they would tend to strike down the credit of the country. If the House was true to itself and to Canada, it would vote down this bold, uncalled for, unqualified attempt to shake the good feeling that now existed between Canada and the Mother Country. Loud cheers.)

Mr. BLAKE then said: So we are open

show how strong had been the manner in which the Government had urged the claim of Canada for losses on account of the Fenian raids. Ther, he continued, a Commission was appointed; and what were the results ? First, the United States demanded an expression of regret for the escape of the Alabama, and she got that. Then she demanded the adoption

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »