properly-Manslaughter. See Jackson v. State, 152.
Section 12604-Motor vehicles-Violation of speed limit
Manslaughter. See Jackson v. State, 152.
Section 12614-Motor vehicles-Penalty for failure to provide
with lights, brakes and bell-Negligence. See Chesrown v.
Bevier, 282.
Section 12819-Criminal law-Carrying concealed weapons pro-
hibited - No exceptions as to home, when. See State v. Nieto,
409.
Section 13560 (108 O. L., pt. 1, 158) — Special grand juries — At-
torney general-Constitutional law. See State, ex rel., v. Price,
50.
Construed-Section 3, Article 18, Constitution (1912) - Local
police regulations. See Leis v. Cleveland Ry. Co., 162.
Elimination - Inability to agree upon plan-Jurisdiction of com-
mon pleas court-Lateral diversion of railroad tracks-Sec-
tion 8879, General Code. See Sandusky v. B. & O. Rd. Co., 225.
1. Duties - Judicial functions not exercised - The grand jury in
its inquest of crimes and offenses, and in its finding and presen-
tation of indictments to the court of common pleas, does not
exercise a judicial function. It only acts as the formal and
constitutional accuser of crime and those it believes to be prob-
ably guilty thereof. State, ex rel., v. Price, 50.
2. Special grand juries—Attorney general and prosecuting at-
torney-Judicial functions not exercised-Neither the at-
torney general nor the prosecuting attorney in connection with
his official services relating to the grand jury exercises any
judicial function under the present statutes of the state of Ohio,
especially Section 13560, General Code, as amended in 1919. Ib.
3. Special grand juries-Section 13560, General Code (108 O. L.,
pt. 1, 158)—Constitutional law-An act of the general as-
sembly authorizing the court of common pleas, upon written
request of the attorney general, to order a special grand jury,
as provided in said Section 13560, General Code, is a valid and
constitutional exercise of the police power. Ib.
Failure to file account-Citation-No limitation of time - No
limitation of time exists which will bar the issuing of a cita-
tion requiring a guardian to file an account of his trust. (Philips
v. State, ex rel. Harter et al., 5 Ohio St., 122, disapproved and
overruled.) McClelland v. State, etc., 42.
Contempt-Commitment by notary public-Depositions. See
Koppel v. Bader, 511; Ex parte Berger, 512.
Automobiles and vehicles- Negligence-Duty to display lights
after sundown-Sections 12614 and 12614-3, General Code.
See Chesrown v. Bevier, 282.
Interurban railway- Negligence-Collision Headlights on car
-Charge to jury-Ordinary care-Question for jury. See
Fairchild v. L. S. Elec. Ry. Co., 264.
1. Act of May 17, 1915 (106 O. L., 574) — Curative provisions ap-
ply, when - Defects in proceedings cured, when - Failure to
advertise for bids-Section 1206, General Code - Section 301
of Chapter 13 of an Act of the General Assembly entitled "An
Act to provide a system of highway laws for the state of Ohio,
and to repeal all sections of the General Code and acts incon-
sistent herewith," passed May 17, 1915 (106 O. L., 574, 662),
has to do only with contracts and proceedings had since May
10, 1910, under Sections 6956-1 to 6956-16, inclusive, General
Code, all of which, except Section 6956-16, are repealed by
that act, and is of no force or efficacy to cure a defect resulting
from failure to comply with the requirements of Section 1206,
General Code (106 O. L., 634, paragraph 199), in the proceed-
ings of the state highway commissioner in the letting of a con-
tract for the improvement of a county section of an inter-
county highway had after the passage of that act and under
other provisions thereof. Cowen v. State, ex rel., 387.
2. Act of December 18, 1919 (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1122) — Validating
and ratifying highway contracts — Inoperative upon contracts
adjudicated invalid — Judgments and error proceedings un-
affected, when - The act of the General Assembly entitled "An
Act providing for the validation and ratification of certain con-
tracts of the state entered into through the state highway de-
partment," passed December 18, 1919 (108 O. L., part 2, 1122),
has no legal application or operation to cure defects in the let-
ting of a contract for the improvement of a county section of
an inter-county highway, which contract by final judgment of
a court of appeals of this state entered on November 11, 1919,
was held illegal and further proceedings thereunder enjoined.
Neither does that enactment authorize the supreme court to
reverse the judgment of the court of appeals so rendered before
its passage, although the act went into effect before the case
was heard in the supreme court, after certification of the record
of the court of appeals. Ib.
Assessments Abutting property owners-Interurban railroad
- Right of way from county commissioners - Perpetual lease
by grantee Lessee not owner "in fee," etc. Section 1209,
General Code (102 O. L., 343). See Dayton Elec. Ry. Co. v.
Scott, 13.
Exercise of care-Use by public and grantee of franchise —
Reciprocal rights, duties and obligations. See Fairchild v. L.
S. Elec. Ry. Co., 261.
Improvement proceedings pending, when-Amendment or repeal
of statutes Section 26, General Code - Act of February 20,
1920 (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1188) — Increasing interest rate on road
bonds - Effect on pending improvements and assessments. See
State, ex rel., v. Zangerle, Auditor, 235.
Municipal corporations - Adoption of standard of time-Scope
Section 3, Article 18, Constitution, 1912-Sections
5979 and 5980, General Code - Constitutional law. See State,
ex rel., v. Cincinnati, 354.
Municipal corporations - Local police regulations - Section 3,
Article 18, Constitution, 1912-"General laws" construed -
Common-law rules inapplicable, when - Ordinance prescribing
Home Rule-Industrial Commission.
Constitutional law - Construction favor-
ing validity of ordinances. See Leis v. Cleveland Ry. Co., 162.
Defined Building restrictions - Construction of contracts -
Deeds. See Arnoff v. Chase, 334.
Divorce proceedings-Court of appeals-Jurisdiction in error.
See Zonars v. Zonars, 518.
Streets Renewal or replacement of street railway tracks, etc.
Municipal bond issues - Sections 3812-2 and 3812-3, General
Code (108 O. L., pt. 1, 215) — Lending public credit to private
corporations Constitutional law. See Cincinnati v. Harth, 344.
Fire insurance-Knowledge of agent imputed to company, when
Insured's title only leasehold - Fee simple policy issued. See
Foster v. Ins. Co., 180.
![[blocks in formation]](https://books.google.co.id/books/content?id=4XsLAAAAYAAJ&hl=id&output=html_text&pg=PA591&img=1&zoom=3&q=%22subject+of+insurance+be+a+building+on+ground+not+owned+by+the+insured+in+fee+simple,%22&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U2K-P0EFyQ-GxpoOd01ay0lnvnelg&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=149,966,411,25)
1. Constitutional law-Act creating commission and superseding
board of awards-Section 871-1 et seq., General Code (103 0.
L., 95) - Acts revived and amended - Section 16, Article 2,
Constitution-The act of the general assembly passed March
12, 1913 (103 O. L., 95, and designated Sections 871-1 et seq.,
General Code), creating the Industrial Commission of Ohio, and
superseding the State Liability Board of Awards and various
other departments therein named, including the chief inspector
of workshops and factories, does not contravene Section 16,
Article 2 of the Ohio Constitution. Kinsinger v. Bd. of Edu-
cation, 298.
2. Act creating commission and superseding board of awards -
Division of workshops and factories - Inspection of school-
houses-Section 1031, General Code-Bonds to replace con-
demned buildings-Section 7630-1, General Code-Repeals by
implication - By virtue of said act certain powers and duties
theretofore devolving upon the chief inspector of workshops and
Industrial Commission — Injunction.
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION - Continued.
factories were conferred upon the Industrial Commission, in-
cluding those enumerated in Sections 1031 and 7630-1, General
Code. Those sections were not repealed, either expressly or by
implication. Ib.
Workmen's compensation - Rules -Award denied claimant — Ap-
plication for rehearing filed after thirty days-Section 1465-44,
General Code-Appeal to common pleas court. See Indus.
Comm. v. Glenn, 454.
Workmen's compensation Award denied claimant-Appeal to
common pleas court-Section 1465-90, General Code (103 O.
L., 88) - Verdict for compensation and award paid-Subse-
quent application for compensation - Denied by industrial com-
mission Appeal does not lie, when― Jurisdiction of industrial
commission Section 1465-86, General
Civil service-Jurisdiction of state commission
and matron - State civil service Rule 6, Section 3 (1919) —
Husband successful but wife fails in examination - Appeal by
removed employe― Refusal of commission to entertain pro-
ceeding. See State, ex rel., v. Commissioners, 336.
Appeal to court of appeals - Questions submitted to court-
Jurisdiction of subject-matter and to assess damages. See
Morton v. Morgan, Murray & Potts Co., 510.
Remedy of aggrieved party- Personal judgment
against legatee - Probate court - Sale of realty to pay debts.
See State, ex rel., v. Lueders, 211.
Jurisdiction-Abatement of nuisances and damages - Railroad
embankment obstructs surface water. See Erie Rd. Co. v.
Garman, 516.
Schools-Bond issue for site and schoolhouse - Submission of
question to electors - Proposition submitted included authorized
and unauthorized purposes. See Allard v. Board of Education,
469.
Schools Officers of newly-created district-Appointment by
county board-Injunction against creation of district-Elec-
tion of members before injunction dissolved - Title and tenure
|