Damages arising from mere sudden terror, unaccompanied by any actual physical injury, but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, cannot under such circumstances be considered a consequence which, in the ordinary course of things, would flow from the negligence... The Central Law Journal - Halaman 1321888Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1908 - 598 halaman
...plaintiff her fright was caused by seeing the train approaching, and thinking they were going to be killed. Damages arising from mere sudden terror unaccompanied...injury, but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, can not under such circumstances, their Lordships think, be considered a consequence which, in the... | |
| 1907 - 1166 halaman
...fright. In its turn, so affects such structures as to cause injury to health, such injury cannot be 'a consequence which, In the ordinary course of things, would flow from the' negligence, unless such injury 'accompany such negligence in point of time.' " In Purcell v. St Paul City Ry. Co.,... | |
| 1888 - 760 halaman
...and thinking they were going to be killed. Damages arising from mère sudden tcrror, nnaccompanied by any actual physical injury, but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, could not, undersuch circumstances. be considered a conséquence which, in thé ordinary course of... | |
| Theodore Sedgwick, Arthur George Sedgwick - 1891 - 764 halaman
...13 App. Cas. 222. C) Byrne v. Great Southern & W. Ry. Co., in the Court of Appeal. injury cannot be a consequence which, in the ordinary course of things, would flow from the negligence, unless such injury accompany such negligence in point of time." The principle adopted in this case... | |
| Jabez Gridley Sutherland - 1893 - 1132 halaman
...to be that damages arising from mere sudden terror, unaccompanied by actual physical injury, cannot be considered a consequence which, in the ordinary course of things, would flow from such negligence.1 The court observed that it was remarkable that no precedent was cited of a similar... | |
| 1894 - 1232 halaman
...arising from mere sudden terror, unaccompanied by any actual physical injury, but occasioning a nervous mental shock, cannot, under such circumstances, their...gatekeeper. If it were held that they can, it appears to thc'ir lordships that it would be extending the liability for negligence much beyond what that liability... | |
| Allan McLane Hamilton - 1894 - 800 halaman
...recover, the damages being too remote. Sir Richard Couch, in delivering the opinion of the court, said : " Damages arising from mere sudden terror unaccompanied...lordships think, be considered a consequence which, iu the ordinary course of things woidd flow from the negligence of the gate-keeper." To the same effect... | |
| Allan McLane Hamilton - 1894 - 754 halaman
...recover, the damages being too remote. -Sir Kichard Couch, in delivering the opinion of the court, said: "Damages arising from mere sudden terror unaccompanied...but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, cannot imder such circumstances, their lordships think, be considered a consequence which in tho ordinary... | |
| John Dawson Mayne, Sir Lumley Smith - 1894 - 744 halaman
...Privy Council declined to say whether actual impact was necessary, but held that damages resulting from mere sudden terror unaccompanied by any actual...injury, but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, could not be considered the natural consequence of the negligence complained of. In the particular... | |
| 1894 - 1228 halaman
...plaintiff, her fright was caused by seeing the train approaching, and thinking they were going to be killed. Damages arising from mere sudden terror, unaccompanied...actual physical Injury, but occasioning a nervous mental shock, cannot, under such circumstances, their lordships think, be considered a consequence... | |
| |