 | New York (State). Commissioners on Practice and Pleadings - 1850 - 898 halaman
...he cannot afterwards maintain an action against the plaintiff therefor. § 648. When cross demands have existed between persons, under such circumstances,...if one had brought an action against the other, a counter-claim could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof, by the assignment... | |
 | California, Selucius Garfielde, Frederick A. Snyder - 1853 - 1108 halaman
...of the action. SEC. 48. When cross demands have existed between persons, under CrOM <i«ni»n<i«. such circumstances, that if one had brought an action against the other, a counter claim could have been set up, neither shall be deprived of the benefit thereof, by the assignment... | |
 | Robert D. Handy, John H. Handy - 1855 - 638 halaman
...assignment of his demand. This matter is accordingly regulated by Section 99 of the Code, which provides: "When cross-demands have existed between persons under...if one had brought an action against the other, a counterclaim or set-off could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof by the... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 halaman
...set-off, he shall not recover costs against the plaintiff in any subsequent action thereon. SEC. 15. When cross-demands have existed between persons under...if one had brought an action against the other, a counter-claim or set-off could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof by... | |
 | William H. R. Wood - 1857 - 834 halaman
...contract, and existing at the commencement of the action.^) Акт. '*•'!. >ec. 48. When cross demands nt, but if @ ! counter claim could have been set up, neither shall be deprived of the benefit thereof, by the assiifnment... | |
 | California, Henry Jacob Labatt - 1858 - 586 halaman
...claim, are to be taken as admitted. — Graham v. Dunniijan, 4 Abbott, 42G. 48. When cross demands have existed between persons, under such circumstances,...if one had brought an action against the other, a counter claim could have been set up, neither shall be deprived of the benefit thereof, by the assignment... | |
 | Kansas - 1858 - 482 halaman
...permitted fendnnt tn lose ,..,«• his set off. to use it as a set-on. SEC. 99. That, when cross demands have existed between persons under such circumstances, that if one had brought an action Cross demands n- , or counter against the other, a counterclaim or set-off could have been set claims... | |
 | Kansas - 1859 - 728 halaman
...set-off. * SEC. 108. When cross demands have existed between persons cro.idnn.nd., • not MlignftUc. under such circumstances, that if one had brought an action against the other, a counter-claim or set-off could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof by... | |
 | California - 1860 - 388 halaman
...the counter claim, are to be taken as admitted. Graham v. Dunnigan, ib. 426. 48. When eross demands have existed between persons, under such circumstances,...if one had brought an action against the other, a counter claim could have been set up, neither shall be deprived of the benefit thereof, by the assignment... | |
 | North Dakota - 1862 - 640 halaman
...between per6' CIVIL PROCEDURE. when eross demands have existed. Guardians or attorneys shall answer. sons under such circumstances, that if one had brought an action against the other, a counter claim or set-off could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof, by... | |
| |
When cross-demands have existed between persons under such circumstances that, if one had brought an action against the other, a counterclaim could have been set up, the two demands shall be deemed compensated, so far as they equal each other, and neither... 
