105 553 Bruker, Roessler v......... ..........261 Burger, Manlove, Receiver, v.........211 Burton, Noble v..... ......168 ........206 Buxton et al. v. Howard et al........109 C 512 .248 .479 Adams Express Co. v. Fendrick.....150 .............. 429 Ault v. Zehering........ V... .......... •530 .........223 City of Ind'polis, Robb v............ 49 City of Ind'polis, Robb v.............. 54 City of Jeffersonville et al., Moberry et al. v.... ...198 City of Lafayette, Barber et al. v....138 Barkalow v. Pfeiffer....... ..................214 Clegg et al. v. Salkill et al............435 Barnett et al. v. Juday.. Beard v. Sloan......... 86 Cole v. Burris........... .................128 Cole, Martin v.......... ..168 .379 Bennifield et ux. v. Hypres et ux.... ...498 Connersville, City of, v. The B'd of B'd of Comm'rs of Fayette Co., The Boyer et al., Ploughe v................113 Bradley et al., Brown v...............IOI D Bradley et al. v. The Indianapolis Builders, etc., Ass'n et al...........101 Daily, Rabb v...... Brown v. Bradley et al................101 | Dale, Adams v.... V............ 46 .105 .........271 Brown, The Excelsior Draining Co. Davis v. Warfield et al...............461 ...........384 Davis, Speer v.............................. Dawson v. Marks, Treasurer, et al..197 | Heller, Receiver, v. McCormick E Elliott, The Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. 15 Hershberger, Ward et al. v......... 76 Hess, Wickham v...................... 183 Hibbs et al., Duckworth et al. v..... 78 Howard et al., Buxton et al. v......109 Howell, The Toledo, etc., R.W.CO. ..447 Hubbard et al. v. Harrison et al...323 Huey et al., Anderson v...............280 Hunt et al. v. The Ind'polis, etc., 153 3 Elmer v. Sand Creek T'p............ 56 Emmons v. The Ind'polis, etc., R. R. Co........... V...... R. R. Co............. 383 Hutchinson et al., Gaff et al. v......341 Hypres et ux., Bennifield et ux. v...498 I 372 Indianapolis Builders, etc., Ass'n et al., Bradley et al. v..... ........ IOI ...247 Indianapolis, City of, v. Lawyer et 560 al....... ..289 Indianapolis, City of, Robb v........ 49 Evansville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Wright.64 | Indianapolis, City of, Robb v.................... 54 Ervin, Paffe v..................................... Erwine v. Scotten....... Ewing v. Ewing... Ewing v. Ewing.... 390 Indianapolis, City of, et al., McKernan v.. 392 Excelsior Draining Co. v. Brown....384 348 ..........223 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co. v. Harter...... ...............557 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Blake ..........372 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Hunt et al. v..... ........383 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Keen ey v..... Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., King V..... 139 Indianapolis, etc. R. R. Co., Nave 96 V.. 348 ...266 ..443 Gilker, McEwen v............ .233 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Nich Ginn v. Ginn....... .526 Goff et al. v. May et al.. .267 Gray v. Stivers et al........... Gregg v. The Ind'polis, etc., R. R. ols V........ ........279 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Os...........294 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Scearce ..........271 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Smith .389 .........185 Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., er v.. Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., Welsham v........ Indianapolis, etc., R. R. son v....... Indianapolis, etc., R. .277 .389 Co., Wil............227 W. Co., .........185 Sullivan, The Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v.. ..262 Sutherland, Kellogg et al. v..........154 T Russell v. Witt et al.......................9 Tarpy v. Crutchfield et al............. 58 S .437 .427 506 ..248 39 I Taulby v. The State....... Taylor, McClure et al. v... Temple et al. v. Aders....... Thomas v. Atkinson....... Thompson v. The State........... Tilman v. Harter et al... Tinder v. The Duck Pond Ditching Ass'n....... .........555 Toledo, etc., R. W. Co. v. Howell..447 Tomlinson et al. v. Jones et al....... 82 474 Travellers' Ins. Co. v. Leeds...... •444 549 Trisler et al. v. Trisler et al...........282 .492 Truitt et al. v. Truitt......... ..128 Trustees of the M. E. Church v. Ellis et al......... ...271 Salkill et al., Clegg et al. v...........435 16 3 Sloan, Beard v........... Smith v. The Ind'polis, etc., R. R. ...... ..389 V 494 Van Dorn v. Bodley............ .....402 Spaugh v. Zeigler......... .83 Speer v. Davis....... ...... Spencer et al., Routh, Adm'r, v.....393 State v. Harper..... ...143 Walker, Adm'r, Archer v.............472 ........... 60 Walpole, Rardin v.................... .146 ..228 ..248 Walton, Cook v.......... ..277 Warfield et al., Davis v. R. Co........... ...389 State, ex rel. Jackson T'p et al., v. Madison T'p.......................... ....483 Zehering, Ault v........... Stewart et al., Capp v...................................................... ..479 Zeigler, Spaugh v....................................................... 83 Stivers et al., Gray v...................197 Zern, Fulwiler v.............................. .....208 Strahn v. Hamilton et al............... 57 Zulauf, Prather v.......... ............155 Ν TABLE OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME. A Abraham v. Chase, 11 Ind. 513..... 20 533 540........... Barber v. Goddard, 9 Gray, 71......501 Ind. 476......... Co., 19 Wis. 145.......................................... .560 B'd of Comm'rs of Allen Co. v. Sil- |B'd of Trustees, etc., v. The State, ex rel. Harding, 11 Ind. 205......196 ..........237 Boston India Rubber Factory v. Hoit, 14 Vt. 92..............................................................434 Boswell v. The State, 8 Ind. 499.... 20 Bourne v. Simpson, 9 B. Mon. 454..140 Bowman v. The Troy, etc., R. R. Co., 37 Barb. 516.560 Boyle v. Guysinger, 12 Ind. 273.....222 Bradley v. The Bank, etc., 20 Ind. 528 ..440 Bradley v. The Washington, etc., Co., 13 Pet. 89....... .......167 Bradshaw v. Callaghan, 8 Johns. 558 .......428 Brady v. The Mayor, etc., 20 N. Y. 312.. ........ 237 Brewer v. Hardy, 22 Pick. 376......338 Brown v. Lunt, 37 Maine, 423.......490 Bridge v. Ford, 4 Mass. 641......36, 517 Brown v. Porter, 37 Ind. 206.........227 Buckingham v. Bailey, 4 Sm. & M. 538. ...517 Buell v. Sherman, 28 Ind. 464........150 Butler v. Wadley, 15 Ind. 502................516 Byers v. The State, ex rel. Hutchison, 20 Ind. 47................................................ C ..515 Caldwell v. Asbury, 29 Ind. 451.....168 |