| 1974 - 226 halaman
...of your attention, why did you neglect Chief Justice Burger's clear formulation in the Griggs case: "discriminatory preference for any group, minority...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed"? Were the law as clear as you seem, somewhat contemptuously, to think, there would have been no need... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1974 - 1966 halaman
...not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every I>erson regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed." The importance of this requirement is reflected in the cautionary words of the Third Circuit Court... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1975 - 1792 halaman
...not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every person regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person be hired simply because he was formerly the s'it'ject of discrimination, or because he is a member of a minority group. Discriminatory preference... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1976 - 1448 halaman
...case on the subject, the Supreme Court, in discussing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; said: In short, the Act does not command that any person...Discriminatory preference for any group, minority or majority, Ls precisely only what Congress has prescribed. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,... | |
| |