Telusuri Gambar Maps Play YouTube Berita Gmail Drive Lainnya »
Login
Buku Buku
" Congress did not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every person regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person be hired simply because he was formerly the subject of discrimination, or because he is... "
Affirmative Action and Equal Protection: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on ... - Halaman 473
oleh United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution - 1983 - 1414 halaman
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Civil Rights Digest, Volume 7

1974 - 226 halaman
...of your attention, why did you neglect Chief Justice Burger's clear formulation in the Griggs case: "discriminatory preference for any group, minority...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed"? Were the law as clear as you seem, somewhat contemptuously, to think, there would have been no need...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on Education and Labor

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1974 - 1966 halaman
...not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every I>erson regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed." The importance of this requirement is reflected in the cautionary words of the Third Circuit Court...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Federal Higher Education Programs: Accreditation, hearings held in ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Special Subcommittee on Education - 1974 - 764 halaman
...not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every person regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed." The importance of this requirement is reflected in the cautionary words of the Third Circuit Court...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Federal Higher Education Programs Institutional Eligibility: Hearings Before ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Special Subcommittee on Education - 1974 - 694 halaman
...the majority of the US Supreme Court in Griggs v. Duke Power (1971) declared that under Title VII, "Discriminatory preference for any group, minority...precisely and only what Congress has proscribed." The Court went on to support individual merit as the basis for selection and reward, declaring: "Congress...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on Education and Labor

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1975 - 1792 halaman
...not intend by Title VII, however, to guarantee a job to every person regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act does not command that any person be hired simply because he was formerly the s'it'ject of discrimination, or because he is a member of a minority group. Discriminatory preference...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Poverty, Equal Opportunity, and Full Employment: Hearings Before the ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Equal Opportunities - 1975 - 496 halaman
...VII, however, i guarantee a job to every person regardless of qualifications. In short, the Act Ħloos not command that any person be hired simply because he was formerly the ubjeet of discrimination, or because he is a member of a minority group. Discriminatory preference...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Federal Higher Education Programs Institutional Eligibility: Hearings Before ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Special Subcommittee on Education - 1975 - 766 halaman
...blacks or women, and the Supreme Court has read the statute as saying that "discriminatory preferences for any group, minority or majority, is precisely and only what Congress 1ms proscribed."" Since Title VII covers federal contractors, it is very doubtful that the contractual...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Affirmative Action in District Government Employment Act, Council Act No. 1 ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia. Subcommittee on Government Operations - 1976 - 56 halaman
...on the subject, the Supreme Court, in discussing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ; said: In short, the Act does not command that any person...for any group, minority or majority, is precisely only what Congress has prescribed. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial, arbitrary,...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on the District of Columbia

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1976 - 1448 halaman
...case on the subject, the Supreme Court, in discussing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; said: In short, the Act does not command that any person...Discriminatory preference for any group, minority or majority, Ls precisely only what Congress has prescribed. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini

Civil Rights: A Staff Report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights - 1976 - 322 halaman
...of your attention, why did you neglect Chief Justice Burger's clear formulation in the Grigga case : "discriminatory preference for any group, minority...is precisely and only what Congress has proscribed" ? Were the law as clear as you seem, somewhat contemptuously, to think, there would have been no need...
Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini




  1. Koleksiku
  2. Bantuan
  3. Penelusuran Buku Lanjutan
  4. Download ePub
  5. Download PDF