The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-made LawRowman & Littlefield, 1994 - 447 halaman This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new 'rights with fateful political consequences.' Originally published by Basic Books. |
Isi
The Rise of JudgeMade | 3 |
Constitutional Interpretation in the Founding | 17 |
John Marshall and Constitutional Interpretation | 39 |
Hak Cipta | |
20 bagian lainnya tidak diperlihatkan
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to ... Christopher Wolfe Pratinjau terbatas - 1994 |
The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Judicial Interpretation to Judge ... Christopher Wolfe Pratinjau terbatas - 1994 |
The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to ... Christopher Wolfe Tampilan cuplikan - 1994 |
Istilah dan frasa umum
American applied approach argued argument basis Bill of Rights broad Burger Court Cardozo Choper clear and present commerce clause Congress consti constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional provisions constitutionality context contract clause debate decisions defendants dissent doctrine Dred Scott due process clause economic effect enforce equal protection established establishment clause example exercise fact federal Federalist Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment framers fundamental grounds guarantee Hamilton Holmes Ibid important intent interest interpretation and judicial interpretivism interstate commerce involved issue judges judicial activism judicial power judiciary Justice laissez-faire legislature liberty limits Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning ment Modern Judicial Review nature opinion particular political present danger principles prohibition question reasonable regulation rules of interpretation separation of powers simply standard statute substantive due process Supreme Court theory tion tional traditional tution unconstitutional upheld violated vote Warren Court Wheaton words