Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

May be found in the files of the subcommittee.

IV

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

1949___

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

32. Cablegram from Sieling & Jarvis to Masters, December 18,
1950-

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

35. Letter from Secretary of Defense Louis Johnson to Maj.

Gen. Philip B. Fleming, Chairman Maritime Commission,

October 4, 1949_.

36. Letter from Senator Richard M. Nixon to Admiral E. L.
Cochrane, Maritime Administrator, and reply, March 3,
1952...

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

39. Application for remission or mitigation of forfeitures or
penalties with respect to certain T-2 tankers___
40. Letter from David Jarvis to State Department, August 18,

[blocks in formation]

1949.

405

716

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

47. Letter from Maj. Gen. Philip B. Fleming, Chairman, United
States Maritime Commission to Secretary of Defense
Louis Johnson, November 1, 1949.

48. Letter from Secretary of Defense George C. Marshall to
Secretary of State Dean G. Acheson, October 5, 1950-
49. Letter from Newbold Morris to Secretary of United States
Maritime Commission, December 11, 1947--

[blocks in formation]

51. Press release from the Chinese Embassy, Washington, D. C., April 13, 1951..

50. Statement from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York, February 7, 1951--

[blocks in formation]

52. Letter from Senator Karl E. Mundt to Secretary of Navy
Dan A. Kimball and reply, March 7, 1952, and March
11, 1952, respectively.
53. Application for relief from forfeitures filed with Secretary of
Federal Communications Commission, August 27, 1951.-
54. Letter from Francis B. Goertner, Assistant General
Counsel, United States Maritime Commission to Messrs.
Post, Morris & Lovejoy, February 3, 1948-

55. Photostatic copy of entry from office diary of Admiral W.
W. Smith, Maritime Commission, December, 1948.
56. Memorandum from Commissioner Raymond McKeough
to Chairman of United States Maritime Commission,
December 19, 1949, and attachments..

57. Report from Paul A. Walker, Chairman, Federal Com-
munications Commission to Senate Permanent Subcom-
mittee on Investigations, March 12, 1952__

[blocks in formation]

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

1. Charts mentioned by William A. Leece throughout his testimony..

[blocks in formation]

SALE OF GOVERNMENT-OWNED SURPLUS TANKER

VESSELS

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1952

UNITED STATES SENATE,

PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS

OF THE COMMITTEE ON EXPENDITURES
IN THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS,

Washington, D. C.

The subcommittee met, pursuant to Senate Resolution No. 251, Eighty-second Congress, second session, agreed to January 24, 1952, in room 357 of the Senate Office Building, Senator Clyde R. Hoey (chairman of the subcommittee), presiding.

Present: Senators Hoey, McClellan, Underwood, Mundt, and Nixon.

Also present: Francis D. Flanagan, chief counsel; William A. Leece, assistant counsel, and Ruth Young, chief clerk.

Senator HOEY. The committee will please come to order.

I will ask that if the photographers have not taken all the pictures they wish to, they take them now, so that we may proceed with expedition. We will follow the usual practice of not taking pictures during the time the witnesses testify. Whatever pictures are to be made will be made before the witness begins to testify.

I wish to make a brief opening statement.

Last year the Subcommittee on RFC of the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency received testimony that a group headed by Joseph E. Casey had acquired eight tanker vessels from the Maritime Commission. After the RFC Subcommittee had taken some testimony in connection with these tanker transactions, it decided that further investigation in this case was beyond the scope of its jurisdiction. For that reason Senator Fulbright, the chairman of the RFC Subcommittee, referred this case for further investigation to this subcommittee. At about this same time last year the Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce was also making preliminary inquiries in the case and the chairman of that committee also made available to us the results of his inquiry.

The investigation by our staff indicates that the group headed by Mr. Casey purchased and chartered eight vessels through the American Overseas Tanker Corp. and its several affiliates and subsidiaries. The purchase of five of these tankers from the Government was financed through a loan of $9,705,000 by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Thereafter these five vessels were operated under a charter agreement with the Panama Transport Co., a Panamanian subsidiary of the Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey. The other three

1

tankers which were purchased from the Government by a subsidiary of the American Overseas Tanker Corp. were chartered to the United Tanker Corp., an affiliate of the China International Foundation, Inc. Thereafter the Casey group disposed of all its stock interest in American Overseas Tanker Corp. and affiliated corporations. These stock holdings were sold to two main groups, namely, the United Tanker Corp. in which Chinese nationals had a considerable financial interest, and the Delaware Tanker Corp. which was financed by a Greek national. The stockholders in the Casey group realized $3,250,000 in the sale of their stock interests, which had been acquired on an initial investment of $101,000.

The staff of this subcommittee has been and will continue to make further inquiries into the sale of Government-owned tankers to various corporations. However, this phase of our hearings will be confined to the purchase and resale of the eight tankers which were originally acquired by the Casey group. The main objectives of our investigation at this time are as follows:

1. To determine whether the original purchase of these eight tankers from the Government and the subsequent transfer of the vessels to various other corporations, as well as the use of the ships, was done in a manner consistent with the broad objectives of the Merchant Ships Sales Act of 1946 and in accordance with applicable merchant marine laws and regulations.

2. To determine whether Federal taxes were avoided by the various individuals and corporations who made substantial financial gains from the chartering of these vessels or from the sale and transfer of the stock in the corporations involved in this case.

3. To inquire into the legal, brokerage, and other fees which were paid in connection with various transactions in this case.

The subcommittee staff, together with representatives of the Maritime Administration and the General Accounting Office, have developed considerable information concerning the transactions involved. Because of the involved and intricate nature of the facts in this case, it will be necessary for the subcommittee to develop a considerable amount of detail in these hearings. If this is not done, the legal and tax problems involved cannot be adequately considered nor will it be possible to make a fair and complete presentation of the case. The subcommittee has not sought to prejudge this case, nor render a final judgment until it has made a thorough exploration of all pertinent facts.

The first witness to appear here today is Vice Adm. Edward L. Cochrane, Maritime Administrator, United States Department of Commerce. It is believed that Admiral Cochrane's testimony will serve to outline the policy of the Merchant Ships Sales Act, as well as the operating procedures of the Maritime Commission in their administration of the act. Other witnesses whose testimony may be necessary to determine or to amplify the facts in this case will be called upon to testify as the inquiry progresses.

I will ask Admiral Cochrane if he will stand, please.

Will you hold up your right hand? Do you solemnly swear that the evidence you give in this hearing shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?

Admiral COCHRANE. I do.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »