| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 halaman
...provides that the damages must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or the next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased. 2. Rut it is contended that the error was without prejudice, for the reason that the record contains... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1861 - 700 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased.1' 2 RS p. 205. Personal property, it may be remarked, of the deceased. in certain contingencies,... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1880 - 730 halaman
...latter. * * * The damages .* * # must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, * * * to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." By another statute it was provided that the net proceeds of estates of deceased persons, in case of... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 halaman
...The damages can not exceed $5,000, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, or next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased." As the right to sue is purely a statutory one, and in The Indianapolis, Pittaburg, and Cleveland RR... | |
| 1892 - 554 halaman
...person. It is true the damages, not to exceed $10,000, inure to the benefit of the widow and children or next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased is distributed in that State. But the executor or administrator is the only person who can sue for... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1901 - 704 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed...same manner as personal property of the deceased." The title of the Indiana act of March 4, 1893, known as the Employers' Liability Art, is as follows:... | |
| 1875 - 870 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed...same manner as personal property of the deceased." (Kansas Gen. Stat. 1868, p. 709. ch. 80, $ 422.) Alabama. — " When the death of a person is caused... | |
| Milo Adams McClelland - 1877 - 588 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must enure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed...same manner as personal property of the deceased.' 2 RS p. 205. Personal property, it may be remarked, of the deceased, in certain contingencies might... | |
| David Rorer - 1879 - 468 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, to be distributed...same manner as personal property of the deceased. Under this statute, the Supreme Court of Indiana hold, that an action lies for a wrongful act causing... | |
| 1894 - 2096 halaman
...The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars, and must Inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, If any, or next of kin, to be distributed in the same manner as personal рпцичЧу of the deceased." Gen. St. Kan. 1&S9, par. 4518. In the year 1889 that legislature enacted... | |
| |