...on numerous occasions that the entitlement to an expectation of privacy does not hinge on ownership: "What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. . . . But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally...

...no reasonable expectation of privacy in his journey on the public highway, presumably arguing that "[w]hat a person knowingly exposes to the public,...is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." 5 While not equating "the uninvited shadower in this instance with the 'uninvited ear' described in...

...and acoustical dpvicps which are used to improperly intercept private communications, it held that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of constitutional protection . . . the protection of a person's general right to privacy — his right...

...optical and acoustiai devices which are used to improperly intercept private communications, held that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home c office, is not a subject of constitutional protection . . . the protection of i person's general...

...(1967) and most recently in United States v. United States District Court, US (June 19. 1972).I<:" In Katz v. United States, supra, the Supreme Court,...not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See. 1,1-wi» v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966) ; United State* v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927). But...

...seizure under all the circumstances. The 6 Moreover, what a person knowingly exposes to the public is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See...210 (1966); United States v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927); Hester v. United States, 265 US 57 (1924). Opinion of WHITE, J. 403 US i test of reasonableness...

...innermost secrets of one's home or office are invaded..." BERGER V. NEV YORK. 386 US 41 (1967). "For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places....is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection... .But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally...

...103.45. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v. SHULTZ 11 We said in Katz v. United States, 389 US 347, 351352. "What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. . . . But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally...

...reversed the conviction because of its realization that — to quote the language of the Court's opinion: "[T]he Fourth Amendment protects people, not places....person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. "But what lie seeks to preserve as...

...argument. In Katz v. United States, supra, we said that the Fourth Amendment provides no protection for what "a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office . . . ." 389 US, at 351. The physical characteristics of a person's voice, its tone and manner, as...