Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors]

Patkul. ready to die: death is more eligible than the solitude of a long imprisonment. Would to heaven only that the kind of it were less cruel. Can you, my dear sir, inform me in what manner I am to suffer?" I answered, that it had not been communicated to me; but that I imagine ed it would pass over without noise, as only the colonel and myself had notice of it. That (replied he) I esteem as a favour; but have you seen the sentence? or must I die, without being either heard or condemned ? My apprehensions are of being put to intolerable tortures.' I comforted him in the kindest manner I could; but he was his own best comforter from the Word of God, with which he was particularly acquainted; quoting, among many other passages, the following in Greek, We must enter into the kingdom of heaven through many tribulations. He then called for pen and ink, and intreated me to write down what he should dictate. I did so, as follows:

Testamentum, or my last will as to the disposition of my effects after my death.-I. His majesty King Augustus, having first examined his conscience thoroughly, will be so just as to pay back to my relations the sum he owes me; which being liquidated, will amount to 50,000 crowns; and as my relations are here in the service of Sweden, that monarch will probably obtain it for them.' "At this he said, let us stop here a little; I will quickly return to finish this will; but now let us address ourselves to God by prayer. Prayers being ended, Now (cried he) I find myself yet better, yet in a quieter frame of mind: Oh! were my death less dreadful, with what pleasure would I expiate my guilt by embracing it!-Yes (cried he, after a pause), I have friends in different places, who will weep over my deplorable fate. What will the mother of the king of Prussia say? What will be the grief of the Countess Levolde, who attends on her? But what thoughts must arise in the bosom of her to whom my faith is plighted? Unhappy woman! the news of my death will be fatal to her peace of mind. My dear pastor, may I venture to beg one favour of you?" I assured him he might command every service in my power. 'Have the good• ness then (said he, pressing my hand), the moment I am no more, to write-Alas! how will you set about it? a letter to Madam Einseidelern, the lady I am promised to-Let her know that I die her's; inform her fully of my unhappy fate: Send her my last and eternal farewell! My death is in truth disgraceful; but my manuer of meeting it will, I hope by heaven's and your assistance, render it holy and blessed. This news will be her only consolation. Add farther, dear Sir, that I thanked her with my latest breath for the sincere affection she bore me: May she live long and happy: This is my dying wish.'-I gave him my band in promise that I would faithfully perform all he desired. "Afterwards he took up a book: This (said he) is of my own writing. Keep it in remembrance of me, and as a proof of my true regard for religion. I could wish it might have the good fortune to be presented to the king, that he may be convinced with what little foundation I have been accused of atheism.' Taking it from his hand, I assured him that my colonel would not fail to present it as soon as opportunity offered.

"The rest of his time was employed in prayer, which he went through with a very fervent devotion. On the 30th of September I was again with him at four in the

morning. The moment be heard me he rose, and rendering thanks to God, assured me he had not slept so soundly for a long time. We went to prayers; and in truth his piety and devout frame of mind were worthy of admiration. About six he said he would begin his confession, before the din and clamour of the people without could rise to disturb his thoughts. He then kneeled down, and went through his confession in a manner truly edifying. The sun beginning to appear above the horizon, he looked out of the window, saying, Salve festa dies! This is my wedding-day. I looked, alas! for another, but this is the happier; for to-day shall my soul be introduced by her heavenly bridegroom into the assembly of the blessed! He then asked me, whether I yet knew in what way he was to die? I answered, that I did not. He conjured me, by the sacred name of Jesus, not to forsake him; for that he should find in my company some consolation even in the midst of tortures. Casting his eye on the paper that lay on the table,This will (said he) can never be finished.' I asked him, whether he would put his name to what was already written? No (replied he, with a deep sigh), I will write that hated name no more. My relations will find their account in another place; salute them for me.' He then addressed himself again to God in prayer, and continued his devotions till the lieutenant entered to conduct him to the coach. He wrapped himself up in his cloak, and went forward a great pace, guarded by 100 horsemen. Being arrived at the place of execution, we found it surrounded by 300 foot soldiers; but at the sight of the stakes and wheels, his borror is not to be described. Clasping me in his arms, Beg of God (he exclaimed) that my soul may not be thrown into despair amidst these tortures!' I comforted, I adjured him to fix his thoughts on the death of Jesus Christ, who for our sins was nailed to a cross.

[ocr errors]

"Being now on the spot where he was to suffer, he bid the executioner to do his duty well, and put into his hands some money which he got ready for that purpose. He then stretched himself out upon the wheel; and while they were stripping him naked, he begged me to pray that God would have mercy on him, and bear up his soul in agony. I did so; and turning to all the spectators, said to them, Brethren, join with me in prayer for this unhappy man. Yes (cried he), assist me all of you with your supplications to heaven.' Here the executioner gave him the first stroke. His cries were terrible: 'O Jesus! Jesus! have mercy upon me.' This cruel scene was much lengthened out, and of the utmost horror; for as the headsman had no skill in his business, the unhappy victim received upwards of 15 several blows, with each of which were intermixed the most pitcous groans and invocations of the name of God. At length, after two strokes given on the breast, his strength and voice failed him. In a faultering dying tone, he was just heard to say, Cut off my head?' and the executioner still lingering, he himself placed his head on the scaffold: After four strokes with an hatchet, the head was separated from the body, and the body quartered. Such was the end of the renowned Patkul."

Charles XII. has been very generally and severely censured for not pardoning him, and we are not inclined to vindicate the sovereign. Yet it must be remembered, that Patkul was guilty of a much greater crime than that which drew upon him the displeasure of Charles

Patna

tants is estimated at 150,0co. E. Long. 85. 15. Patna N. Lat. 25. 37.

Patkul XI. He incited foreign powers to attack his country when under the government of a boy, hoping, as he said himself, that it would in such circumstances become easy an conquest. He was therefore a rebel of the worst kind; and where is the absolute monarch that is ready to pardon such unnatural rebellion? Let it be remem bered, too, that Charles, amongst whose faults no other instance of cruelty has been numbered, certainly thought that, in ordering the execution of Patkul, he was discharging his duty. That monarch, it is known, believed in the possibility of discovering the philosopher's stone. Patkul, when under sentence of death, contrived to impose so far upon the senate at Stockholm, as to persuade them that he had, in their presence, converted into gold a quantity of baser metal. An account of this experiment was transmitted to the king, accompanied with a petition to his majesty for the life of so valuable a subject; but Charles, blending magnanimity with his severity, replied with indignation, that he would not grant to interest what he had refused to the call of humanity and the intreaties of friendship.

PATMOS, in Ancient Geography, one of the Sporades (Dionysius); 30 miles in compass (Pliny); concerning which we read very little in authors. It was rendered famous by the exile of St John, and the Revelation showed him there. The greatest part of interpreters think that St John wrote them in the same place during the two years of his exile; but others think that he did not commit them to writing till after his return to Ephesus. The island of Patmos is between the island of Icaria and the promontory of Miletus. Nothing has done it more honour than to have been the place of the banishment of St John. It is now called Patino, or Pactino, or Patmol, or Palmosa. Its circuit is five and twenty or thirty miles. It has a city called Patmos, with a harbour, and some monasteries of Greek monks. It is at present in the hands of the Turks. It is considerable for its harbours; but the inhabitants derive little benefit from them, because the corsairs have obliged them to quit the town, and retire to a hill on which St John's convent stands. This convent is a citadel consisting of several irregular towers, and is a substantial building seated on a very steep rock. The whole island is very barren, and without wood; however, it abounds with partridges, rabbits, quails, turtles, pigeons, and snipes. All their corn does not amount to 1000 barrels in a year. In the whole island there are scarcely 300 men; but there are above 20 women to one man, who expect that all strangers who land in the island should carry some of them away. To the memory of St John is an hermitage on the side of a mountain, where there is a chapel not above eight paces long and five broad. Over head they show a chink in the rock, through which they pretend that the Holy Ghost dictated to St John. E. Long. 26. 84. N. Lat. 37. 24.

PATNA, a town of Hindoostan, where the English have factories for saltpetre, borax, and raw silk. It is the capital of the province of Bahar, a dependency of Bengal, in the empire of Hindoostan, situated in a pleasant country, 400 miles east of Agra. It extends seven miles in length on the banks of the Ganges, and is about half a mile in breadth.-Mr Rennel gives strong reasons for supposing it to be the ancient PALIBOTHRA. The town is large, but the houses are built at a distance from each other. The number of inhabiVOL. XVI. Part I.

PATOMACK, a large river of Virginia, in North, Patræ. America, which rises in the Alleghany mountains, scparates Virginia from Maryland, and falls into Chesapeake bay. It is navigable for near 300 miles. Washington is situated on its north bank.

PATONCE, in Heraldry, is a cross, flory at the ends; from which it differs only in this, that the ends instead of turning down like a fleur-de-lis, are extended somewhat in the pattee form. See FLORY.

PATRÆ, a city of Achaia. This place was visited by Dr Chandler, who gives the following account of it. "It has often been attacked by enemies, taken, and pillaged. It is a considerable town, at a distance from the sea, situated on the side of a hill, which has its summit crowned with a ruinous castle. This made a brave defence in 1447 against Sultan Morat, and held out until the peace was concluded, which first rendered the Morea tributary to the Turks. A dry flat before it was once the port, which has been choked with mud. It has now, as in the time of Strabo, only an indifferent road for vessels. The house of Nicholas Paul, Esq. the English consul, stood on part of the wall either of the theatre or the odeum. By a fountain was a fragment of a Latin inscription. We saw also a large marble bust much defaced; and the French consul showed us a collection of medals. We found nothing remarkable in the citadel. It is a place of some trade, and is inhabited by Jews as well as by Turks and Greeks. The latter have several churches. One is dedicated to St Andrew the apostle, who suffered martyrdom there, and is of great sanctity. It had been recently repaired. The site by the sea is supposed that of the temple of Ceres. By it is a fountain. The air is bad, and the country round about overrun with the low shrub called glycyrrhiza or liquorice."

Of its ancient state, the same author speaks thus: "Patræ assisted the Etolians when invaded by the Gauls under Brennus; but afterwards was unfortunate, reduced to extreme poverty, and almost abandoned. Augustus Cæsar reunited the scattered citizens, and made it a Roman colony, settling a portion of the troops which obtained the victory of Actium, with other inhabitants from the adjacent places. Patræ reflourished and enjoyed dominion over Naupactus, Oeanthé, and several cities of Achaia. In the time of Pausanias, Patre was adorned with temples and porticoes, a theatre, and an odéum which was superior to any in Greece but that of Atticus Herodes at Athens. In the lower part of the city was a temple of Bacchus symnetes, in which was an image preserved in a chest, and conveyed, it was said, from Troy by Eurypylus; who, on opening it, became disordered in his senses. By the port were temples; and by the sea, one of Ceres, with a pleasant grove and a prophetic fountain of unerring veracity in determining the event of any illness. After supplicating. the goddess with incense, the sick person appeared, dead or living, in a mirror suspended so as to touch the surface of the water. In the citadel of Patre was a temple of Diana Laphria, with her statne in the habit of a huntress, of ivory and gold, given by Augustus Cæsar when he laid waste Calydon and the cities of Ætolia to people Nicopolis. The Patrensians honoured her with a yearly festival, which is described by Pausanias who G

+

was

Fatræ

was a spectator. They formed a circle round the altar by others to be an instance of prophetic inspiration more Pa with picces of green wood, each 16 cubits long, and than of patriarchal power. The fourth instance is that Patriarch within heaped dry fuel. The solemnity began with a of Judah with regard to Tamar (Gen. xxxviii. 24.); with most magnificent procession, which was closed by the regard to which it is remarked, that Jacob, the father of virgin-priestess in a chariot drawn by stags. On the Judah, was still living; that Tamar was not one of his following day, the city and private persons offered at the own family; and that she had been guilty of adultery, altar fruits, and birds, and all kinds of victims, wild- the punishment of which was death by burning; and boars, stags, deer, young wolves, and beasts full grown; that Judah on this occasion might speak only as a proseafter which the fire was kindled. He relates, that a bear and another animal forced a way through the fence, but were reconducted to the pile. It was not remembered that any wound had ever been received at this ceremony, though the spectacle and sacrifice were as dangerous as savage. The number of women at Patra was double that of the men. They were employed chiefly in a manufacture of flax which grew in Ellis, weaving garments, and attire for the head."

PATRANA, or PASTRANA, a town of New Castile in Spain, with the title of a duchy. It is seated between the rivers Tajo and Tajuna, in W. Long. 2. 45. N. Lat.

40. 26.

PATRAS, an ancient town of European Turkey, in
the Morca, with a Greek archbishop's see.
It con-
tains about 440 families; and the Jews, who are one-
third part of the inhabitants, have four synagogues.
There are several handsome mosques and Greek
churches. The Jews carry on a trade in silk, leather,
honey, wax, and cheese. There are cypress trees of a
prodigious height, and excellent pomegranates, citrons,
and oranges. It stands at a little distance from the
sea, and its port is now choaked up with mud. It is
in the hands of the Turks. E. Long. 21. 45. N. Lat.
38. 17.

PATRICA, a town of Italy, in the territory of the
church, and in the Campagna of Rome, towards the
sea-coast, and eight miles east of Ostia. About a mile
from this place is a hill called Monte de Livano, which
some have thought to be the ancient Lavinium founded
by Æneas.

PATRES CONSCRIPTI. See CONSCRIPT and SE

NATOR.

PATRIARCH, PATRIARCHA, one of those first fathers who lived towards the beginning of the world, and who became famous by their long lines of descendants. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and his twelve sons, are the patriarchs of the Old Testament; Seth, Enoch, &c. were antediluvian patriarchs.

cutor.

It

On the whole, however, it is difficult to say which of these opinions is most agreeable to truth. Men who believe the origin of civil government, and the obligation to obedience, to arise from a supposed original contract, either real or implied, will be naturally led to weaken the authority of the patriarchs: and those again who esteem government to be a divine institution, will be as apt to raise that authority to the highest pitch that either reason or scripture will permit them. cannot be denied, that autkority existed in fathers, and descended to their first-born, in the first ages of the world; and it is neither unnatural nor improbable to imagine, that the idea of hereditary power and hereditary honours was first taken from this circumstance. But whether authority has descended through father and son in this way to our times, is a circumstance that cannot in one instance be asserted, and can be denied in a thousand. The real source of the dignity and of the authority of modern times seems to have been, skill in the art of war, and success in the conduct of conquests.

Jewish PATRIARCH, a dignity, respecting the origin of which there are a variety of opinions. The learned authors of the Universal History think, that the first appearance and institution of those patriarchs happened under Nerva the successor of Domitian. It seems probable that the patriarchs were of the Aaronic or Levitical race; the tribe of Judah being at that time too much depressed, and too obnoxious to the Romans to be able to assume any external power. But of whatever tribe they were, their authority came to be very considerable. Their principal business was to instruct the people; and for this purpose they instituted schools in several cities. And having gained great reputation for their extraordinary learning, zeal, and piety, they might, in time, not only bring a great concourse of other Jews from other parts, as from Egypt and other western provinces of their dispersion, but likewise prove the means of their patriarchal authority's being acknowledged there. From them they ventured at length to levy a kind of tribute, in order to defray the charges of their dignity, and of the officers, (viz. the Apostoli or Legati), under them, whose business it was to carry their orders and decisions through the other provinces of their dispersion, and to see them punctually executed by all, that some shadow of union at least might be kept up among the western Jews. They likewise nominated the doctors who were to preside over their schools and academies; and these were in process of time styled chiefs and princes, in order to raise the credit of that dignity, or to im

The authority of patriarchal government existed in the fathers of families, and their first-born after them, exercising all kinds of ecclesiastical and civil authority in their respective households; and to this government, which lasted till the time of the Israelites dwelling in Egypt, some have ascribed an absolute and despotic power, extending even to the punishment by death. In proof of this, is produced the curse pronounced by Noah upon Canaan (Gen ix. 25.); but it must be observed, that in this affair Noah seems to have acted rather as a prophet than a patriarch. Another instance of supposed despotic power is Abraham's turning Hagar and Ishmael out of his family (Gen. xxi. 9, &c.); but this can hard-ply the great regard which their disciples were to pay ly be thought to furnish evidence of any singular authority vested in the patriarchs, as such, and peculiar to those ages. The third instance brought forward to the same purpose is that of Jacob's denouncing a curse upon Simeon and Levi (Gen. xlix. 7.), which is maintained

to them. These chiefs became at length rivals of the
patriarchs; and some of them possessed both dignities at
once; an usurpation which caused not only great confu-
sion amongst them, but oftentimes very violent and
bloody contests. However, as the Jewish Rabbies have

trumped

Patriarch. trumped up a much older era for this patriarchal dignity, and have given us a succession of them down to the fifth century, in which it was abolished, it will not be amiss to give our readers the substance of what they have written of the rise and progress of this order of men; and at the same time to show them the absurdity and falsehood of that pretended succession to this imaginary dignity.

According to them, the first patriarch was Hillel, surnamed the Babylonian, because he was sent for from thence to Jerusalem about 100 years before the ruin of their capital, or 30 years before the birth of Christ, to decide a dispute about the keeping of Easter, which on that day fell out on the Sabbath-day; and it was on account of his wise decision that he was raised to that dignity, which continued in his family till the said fifth century. He was likewise looked upon as a second Moses, because he lived like him 40 years in obscurity, 40 more in great reputation for learning and sanctity, and 40 more in possession of this patriarchal dignity. They make him little inferior to that lawgiver in other of his excellencies, as well as in the great authority he gained over the whole Jewish nation. The wonder will be, how Herod the Great, who was so jealous of his own power, could suffer a stranger to be raised to such a height of it, barely for having decided a dispute which must in all likelihood have been adjudged by others long before that time.

However, Hillel was succeeded by his son Simeon, whom many Christians pretend to have been the venerable old person of that name, who received the divine infant in his arms. The Jews give him but a very obscure patriarchate; though the authors above quoted make him, moreover, chief of the sanhedrim; and Epiphanius says, that the priestly tribe hated him so much for giving so ample a testimony to the divine child, that they denied him common burial. But it is hardly credible that St Luke should have so carelessly passed over his twofold dignity, if he had been really possessed of them, and have given him no higher title than that of a just and devout man.

He was succeeded by Jochanan, not in right of descent, but of his extraordinary merit, which the Rabbies, according to custom, have raised to so surprising a height, that, according to them, if the whole heavens were paper, all the trees in the world pens, and all the men writers, they would not suffice to pen down all his lessons. He enjoyed his dignity but two years, according to some, or five according to others and was the person who, observing the gates of the temple to open of their own accord, cried out, "O temple, temple! why art thou thus moved! We know that thou art to be destroyed, seeing Zechariah hath foretold it, saying, "Open thy gates, O Lebanus, and let the flames consume thy cedars." Upon this he is further reported to have complimented Vespasian, or rather, as some have corrected the story, Titus, with the title of king, assuring him that it was a royal person who was to destroy that edifice; on which account they pretend that general gave him leave to remove the sanhedrim to Japhne.

The Jewish writers add, that he likewise erected an academy there, which subsisted till the death of Akiba; and was likewise the seat of the patriarch; and consisted of 300 schools, or classes of scholars. Another he

] PAT erected at Lydda, not far from Japhne, and where the Patriarch. Christians have buried their famed St George. He li-d ved 120 years, and being asked, what he had done to prolong his life? he gave this wise answer; I never made water nearer a house of prayer than four cubits ; I never disguised my name: I have taken care to cele brate all festivals: and my mother hath even sold my head ornaments to buy wine enough to make me merry on such days; and left me at her death 300 hogsheads of it, to sanctify the Sabbath.-The doctors who flourished in his time were no less considerable, both for their number and character; particularly the famed Rabbi Chanina, of whom the Bath Col was heard to say, that the world was preserved for the sake of him; and R. Nicodemus, whom they pretend to have stopped the course of the sun, like another Joshua.

He was succeeded by Gamaliel, a man, according to them, of unsufferable pride; and yet of so universal authority over all the Jews, not only in the west, but over the whole world, that the very monarchs suffered his laws to be obeyed in their dominions, not one of them offering to obstruct the execution of them. In his days flourished Samuel the Less, who composed a prayer full of the bitterest curses against heretics, by which they mean the Christians; and which are still in useto this day. Gamaliel was no less an enemy to them; and yet both have been challenged, the former as the celebrated master of our great apostle, the other as his disciple in his unconverted state.

Simon II. his son and successor was the first martyr who died during the siege of Jerusalem. The people so regretted his death, that an order was given, instead of 10 bumpers of wine, which were usually drank at the funeral of a saint, to drink 13 at his, on account of his martyrdom. These bumpers were in time multiplied, they tell us, to such shameful height, that the sanhedrim was forced to make some new regulations to prevent that abuse.

These are the patriarchs which, the Rabbies tell us, preceded the destruction of the temple; and we need no farther confutation of this pretended dignity, than the silence of the sacred historians, who not only make not the least mention of it, but assure us all along that they were the high-priests who presided in the sanhedrim; and before whom all cases relating to the Jewish religion were brought and decided. It was the high-priest who examined and condemned our Saviour; that condemned St Stephen; that forbade the apostles to preach in Christ's name; and who sat as judge on the great apostle at the head of that supreme court. The same may be urged from Josephus, who must needs have known and mentioned this pretended dignity, if any such there had been; and yet is so far from taking the least notice of it, that, like the evangelists, he places the pontiff's alone at the head of all the Jewish affairs; and names the high-priest Ananus as having the care and direction of the war against the Romans;-which is an evident proof that there were then no such patriarchs in being.

To all this let us add, that if there had been any such remarkable succession, the Talmudists would have preserved it to future ages; whereas, neither they, nor any of the ancient authors of the Jewish church, make any mention of it; but only some of their doctors, who have written a considerable time after them, as of writers to whom little credit can be given in points of this Ga

nature;

Patriarch, nature; especially as there are such unsurmountable Patriarcas contradictions between them, as no authors either Jewish or Christian have, with all their pains, been hitherto able to reconcile.

Their succession, according to the generality of those
rabbies, stands as follows:

1. Hillel the Babylonian. 2. Simeon the son of Hil-
lel. 3. Gamaliel the son of Simeon. 4. Simeon II.
the son of Gamaliel. 5. Gamaliel II. the son of Sime-
on II. 6. Simeon III. the son of Gamaliel II. 7. Ju-
dah the son of Simeon III. 8. Gamaliel III. the son
of Judah. 9. Judah II. the son of Gamaliel III.
Hillel II. son of Judah II. 11. Judah III. son of Hil-
lel II. 12. Hillel III. son of Judah III. 13. Gama-
liel IV. son of Hillel III.

10.

According to Gants Tzemach David, who hath re-
duced them to 10, they are,

1. Hillel the Babylonian. 2. Simeon the son of Hil-
lel. 3. Rabb. Gamaliel Rebona. 4. R. Simeon the son
of Gamaliel. 5. Rabban Gamaliel his son. 6. R. Je-
hudah the prince. 7. Hillel the prince, his son. 8.
Rabban Gamaliel the Old. 9. Simeon III.
10. R.
Judah, Nassi or prince.
On the whole, it cannot be doubted but that their
first rise was in Nerva's time, however much Jewish
pride may have prompted them to falsify, and to assert
their origin to have been more ancient that it really
was. Nor have the Jews been faithful in giving an
account of the authority of these men. They have ex-
aggerated their power beyond all bounds, for the pur-
pose of repelling the arguments of Christians: for their
power was certainly more showy than substantial. In
time, however, they certainly imposed upon the peo-
ple; and what power they did possess (which the Ro-
mans only allowed to be in religious matters, or in such
as were connected with religion) they exercised with
great rigour. Their pecuniary demands, in particular,
became very exorbitant; and was the cause of their
suppression in the year 429.

[ocr errors]

PATRIARCHS, among Christians, are ecclesiastical dignitaries, or bishops, so called from their paternal authority in the church. The power of patriarchs was not the same in all, but differed according to the different customs of countries, or the pleasures of kings and councils. Thus the patriarch of Constantinople grew to be

a patriarch over the patriarchs of Ephesus and Caesarea, Patr
and was called the ecumenical and universal patriarch;
and the patriarch of Alexandria bad some prerogatives
which no other patriarch but himself enjoyed, such as
the right of consecrating and approving every single bi-
shop under his jurisdiction.

The patriarchate has been ever esteemed the supreme dignity in the church: the bishop had only under him the territory of the city of which he was bishop; the metropolitan superintended a province, and had for suffragans the bishops of his province; the primate was the chief of what was then called a diocese (A), and had several metropolitans under him; and the patriarch had under him several dioceses, composing one exarchate, and the primates themselves were under him.

Usher, Pagi, De Marca, and Morinus, attribute the establishment of the grand patriarchates to the apostles themselves; who, in their opinion, according to the description of the world then given by geographers, pitched on the three principal cities in the three parts of the known world; viz. Rome in Europe, Antioch in Asia, and Alexandria in Africa: and thus formed a trinity of patriarchs. Others maintain that the name patriarch was unknown at the time of the council of Nice; and that for a long time afterwards patriarchs and primates were confounded together, as being all equally chiefs of dioceses, and equally superior to metropolitans, who were only chiefs of provinces. Hence Socrates gives the title patriarch to all the chiefs of dioceses, and reckons ten of them. Indeed, it does not appear that the dignity of patriarch was appropriated to the five grand sees of Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem, till after the couacil of Chalcedon in 451 ; for when the council of Nice regulated the limits and prerogatives of the three patriarchs of Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria, it did not give them the title of patriarchs, though it allowed them the pre-eminence and privileges. thereof; thus when the council of Constantinople adjudged the second place to the bishop of Constantinople, who till then was only a suffragan of Heraclea, it said nothing of the patriarchate. Nor is the term patriarch found in the deeree of the council of Chalcedon, whereby the fifth place is assigned to the bishop of Jerusalem; nor did these five patriarchs govern all the churches.

There

Under the article EPISCOPA

(A) The word diocese was then of very different import from what it bears now.
CY, it was observed, that the first founders of churches regulated their extent and the jurisdiction of their bishops
by the divisions of the Roman empire into civil jurisdictions. One of these divisions was into provinces and
dioceses. A province comprised the cities of a whole region subjected to the authority of one chief magistrate,
who resided in the metropolis or chief city of the province. A diocese was a still larger district, comprehending
within it several provinces, subject to the controul of a chief magistrate, whose residence was in the metropolis
of the diocese. The jurisdiction of the bishops of the Christian church was established upon this model. The
authority of a private bishop extended only over the city in which he resided, together with the adjacent villages
and surrounding tract of country. This district was called agonia, though it comprehended many parishes in
the modern sense of that word. Under Arcadius and Honorius the empire was divided into thirteen dioceses:
1. The Oriental diocese, containing fifteen provinces; 2. The diocese of Egypt, six provinces; 3. The Asiatic
diocese, ten provinces; 4. The Pontic diocese, ten provinces; 5. The diocese of Thrace, six provinces; 6. The
diocese of Macedonia, six provinces; 7. The diocese of Decia, five provinces; 8. The Italic diocese, seventeen
provinces; 9. The diocese of Illyricum, six provinces; 10. The diocese of Africa, six provinces; 11. The Spanish
diocese, seven provinces; 12. The Gallican diocese, seventeen provinces; 13. The Britannic diocese, five pro-
vinces. Each of these provinces comprehended many goxin, and each goxin many modern parishes. See
Bingham's Origines Sacre, Book ix.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »