Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

ether the contract is one to sell merely or
manufacture and sell, in the absence in the
ter case of the assent of the buyer to an ap-
opriation on the contract of goods manu-
etured by the seller, or unless they are of
ch peculiar character as not to be market-
le.-River Spinning Co. v. Atlantic Mills
C.) 466.

Where a purchaser refuses to take goods
ught which the seller has not on hand, but is
manufacture or purchase, the measure of his
mages recoverable for breach of the contract
not the difference between the contract price
d the market price of the goods at the time
the breach, but the actual profit he would
ve made on the sale.-River Spinning Co. v.
lantic Mills (C. C.) 466.

A company operating mills for making yarn
ich contracted to sell a quantity of yarn to
delivered in the future, on a refusal by the
yer to carry out the contract, held not en-
led to recover as damages a loss on a resale
wool which it had bought in advance of its
ed and held in reserve to be used in filling
e contract.-River Spinning Co. v. Atlantic
ills (C. C.) 466.

The measure of the damages recoverable by
seller for the breach by the purchaser of a
ntract for the sale of a quantity of scrap
eel, which, on the failure of the purchaser to
ke it, was sold by the seller at the market
ice, is the difference between such price and
e contract price.-Benjamin v. Maloney (C.
0494.

SALVAGE.

1. Right to compensation.

*Prima facie a vessel found at sea in a

desks allowed by the trustees of a school dis-
trict held not established as a valid claim
against the district, where it was disallowed in
part by the county superintendent, the board
of citizens and taxpayers, and the board of
county commissioners.-Whitaker & Ray Co. v.
Roberts (C. C.) 882.

Prior to the allowance of claims against a
school district by the officers selected therefor
or the establishment of the claims at law, pro-
ceedings could not be maintained to compel the
officers of the county to pay the same.-Whita-
ker & Ray Co. v. Roberts (C. C.) 882.
school desks, purchased by school trustees un-
In a suit to compel payment of a claim for
der Comp. Laws Nev. §§ 1294, 1298, a bill
failing to join such school trustees and praying
no relief against them held demurrable.-Whita-
ker & Ray Co. v. Roberts (C. C.) 882.

SCIRE FACIAS.

Jurisdiction of circuit court of United States
to issue, see "Courts," § 2.

SENTENCE.

In criminal prosecutions, see "Criminal Law,"
§ 3.

SEPARABLE CONTROVERSIES.

Removal from state court, see "Removal of
Causes," § 2.

SERVICE.

cuation of peril with no one on board is a Of process, see "Process," § 1.
relict, but where the master and crew have
Et temporarily for the purpose of obtaining
sistance, and with intent to return and re-
mė possession, she is not technically a derelict,

SERVICES.

though another vessel finding her in such con- See "Work and Labor."
tion and rescuing her is entitled to salvage
mpensation as in case of a derelict.-The
awmut (D. C.) 476; The Myrtle Tunnel, Id.

2. Amount and apportionment.

A steamer which rescued a dis bled schooner
mporarily abandoned at sea by her officers and
ew held entitled to a salvage award as in
se of a derelict, but, in view of the efforts
ade by the owners to retake her, which would
obably have been successful, to only one-
ird of the value of the schooner and cargo,
nich was fixed at $88,000.-The Shawmut (D.
476; The Myrtle Tunnel, Id.

CHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
DISTRICTS.

risdiction of suit in equity to compel payment
for school desks, see "Equity," § 1.
andamus to compel payment by school dis-
Erict, see "Mandamus," § 1.

1. Public schools.

Under Comp. Laws Nev. §§ 1287, 1338, and
ws Feb. 13, 1905, p. 23, § 9, a bill for school

SETTLEMENT.

See "Account Stated."

SHIPPING.

See "Collision"; "Maritime Liens"; "Salvage";
"Towage"; "Wharves."

Custom as affecting construction of charter par-
ty, see "Customs and Usages.'
Immigration regulations, see "Commerce," § 3.
Stated account for repairs on vessel, see "Ac-
count Stated."

[blocks in formation]

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

*Where a charter party provided that the $ 3. Carriage of goods.
freight specified
should be in full of primage visions of a bill of lading, the conditions a

*In construing and giving effect to the pi
consulage, port charges, etc., as customary,
and also that the vessel should, if required, dis- circumstances which the evidence proves we
charge by night as well as by day, she is liable known to the parties and contemplated by the
for extra port charges incurred by reason of in making it are to be taken into consideratio
night work, although the discharging was done -Pacific Coast Co. v.

V. Yukon Independe
by the charterer under a provision giving him Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
that option at a specified rate to be paid by the
vessel.-The Bencliff (D. C.) 242.

A parol contract for the shipment of good

pursuant to which they were laden on boai
A charter party construed, and held not to may be shown to affect the construction of bil
entitle a charterer on his exercise of an option of lading signed and delivered after the goo
to discharge the vessel at a specified rate, to be were loaded and when the vessel was about
paid by the ship, to charge extra for the cost of sail, and, in order that provisions of such bil
night work.-The Bencliff (D. C.) 242.

shall override the prior agreement, the burd
In a suit in personam by a vessel owner to called to the attention of the shipper and a

to
recover freight money from a charterer, the called to the attention of the shipper and a
claim that under the cessor clause of the charter sented to by him.-Pacific Coast Co. v. Yuk
the sole remedy of the libelant was in rem Independent Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
against the cargo cannot be urged as a defense A provision of bills of lading giving the vess
where it was not raised by the pleadings.- the right to "deviate" does not authorize be
The Bencliff (D. C.) 242.

after arriving at the port of delivery, to retu
The payment by a vessel to a charterer of a to the port of shipment with the goods on boar
commission provided for by the charter party; of delivery, which is not a deviation but

and thence make a second voyage to the po
which was in effect an address commission, held
tendarce fee of the charterer's agent at the port Independent Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
not to relieve her from the payment of the at- abandonment of the voyage so far as relates

such shipment.-Pacific Coast Co. v. Yuk
of discharge to whom she was consigned by the
terms of the charter for attending to her inward The owners of a vessel held liable for brea
business at that port.-The Lady Palmerston of a contract of affreightment where because
(D. C.) 250.

ice in the harbor at the port of delivery, whic

was a contingency contemplated by the parti
§ 2. Liabilities of vessels and owners and provided for, the goods were carried ba
in general.

to the port of shipment and not delivered unt
The contracts of a managing agent of a steam- the next voyage.-Pacific Coast Co. v. Yuk
ship company, within the sphere of his au- Independent Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
thority, are the actual contracts of the owner,
and not of the vessels to which they relate, as in

*Provisions of bills of lading requiring clair
case of contracts made by a master on a voyage for loss or damage to cargo to be presented
or in foreign ports. Great Lake Towing Co. the carrier within a stated time, and barring ar
v. Mill Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 11.

suit for such loss or damage unless commence

within a further stated time, will be enforced I
*A steamer must be held to know the reason- the courts only so far as they are reasonab
able effect of her swell and to take reasonable under the circumstances of the particular cas
precautions to prevent injury therefrom to and such requirements may also be waived 1
other vessels.-The Chester W. Chapin (D. C.) the carrier by his conduct.-Pacific Coast Co.
854.

Yukon Independent Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 2
*A meeting steamer held liable for the injury A suit by a shipper to recover for breach of
of one of the scows in a tow in East River contract of carriage and for damage to car
caused by her swell, on the ground that she held not barred under provisions of the bills 1
should have appreciated the danger and slowed quiring notice and limiting the time for brin
down or kept at a greater distance.-The Ches- ing suit, on the ground that libelant had reaso
ter W. Chapin (D. C.) 854.

ably complied with the requirement of notid

and that the limitation had been waived.
*A passing steamer held in fault for injury Pacific Coast Co. v. Yukon Independent Trans
to a floating dry dock permanently located Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
alongside of a pier by passing at such speed as
to cause a dangerous swell, and the owners of Provisions of bills of lading limiting the li
the dock also held in fault for failing to make bility of the carrier apply only to the co
better provisions against the effect of such templated voyage, and, where the carrier volu
swells.-James Shewan & Sons v. New England tarily abandons such voyage, he cannot invol
Navigation Co. (D. O.) 860.

such limitations.-Pacific Coast Co. v. Yuk,
*The duty of a passing steamer with respect Independent Transp. Co. (C. C. A.) 29.
to causing dangerous swells is the same to- *The measure of damages recoverable fro
ward a floating dry dock permanently located a vessel for damage to a cargo of steel throug
alongside a pier as toward vessels similarly sit- its fault is the difference between the mark
uated, and she is bound to exercise reasonable value of the cargo at the port of delivery in i
care, having regard to the character of_the damaged condition and its value if it had be
structure.-James Shewan & Sons v. New Eng- delivered in good condition, with interest fro
land Navigation Co. (D. C.) 860.

the time of delivery and other items of expe
*Point annotated. See syllabus.

ure made necessary by reason of the damage.
The Berengere (D. C.) 439.

4. Carriage of passengers.

The death of a passenger on a ferryboat by
ling overboard held due to his own negligence
leaning against a gate, despite a sign warning
ssengers against it, and the vessel not liable.-
e Southside (D. C.) 364.

5. Demurrage.

A vessel under contract requiring reasonable
spatch held liable for the damages caused to
e consignee by reason of delay in discharging
consequence of her failure to supply suf-
ient steam.-The Heathdene (D. C.) 368; Mil-
rn v. Federal Sugar Refining Co., Id.

6. Limitation of owner's liability.
Act June 26, 1884, c. 121, § 18, 23 Stat. 57
. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2945], and Rev. St.
4283 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2943], both
lating to limitation of liability of shipowners,
e in pari materia, and to be construed togeth-
and the later act, like the earlier, is confined
liabilities incurred without the knowledge or
ivity of the owners, and does not apply to
abilities of the owners for the consequences of
eir personal faults or upon their personal con-
acts.-Great Lake Towing Co. v. Mill Transp.
b. (C. C. A.) 11.

SLEEPING CARS.

See "Carriers," § 3.

SOLDIERS.

See "Army and Navy."

SPECIFICATIONS.

Of objections to discharge of bankrupt, see
"Bankruptcy," § 14.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

§ 1. Proceedings and relief.

*A bill for specific performance of a contract
by one of the defendants to assign to complain-
ant a patent for an invention alleged to have
been made by such defendant while in com-
plainant's employment, the application for
which patent he had assigned to his codefend-
ant, held, on demurrer, to state a cause of ac-
tion.-Thompson v. Automatic Fire Protection
Co. (C. C.) 548.

STALE DEMAND.

The owner of a vessel lost by stranding held
ot entitled, under Act June 26, 1884, c. 121,
18, 23 Stat. 57 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.
945], to a limitation of liability for services See "Equity," § 2.
ndered by a towing company in attempting to
scue such vessel under a contract made by
e managing agent of such owner.-Great
ake Towing Co. v. Mill Transp. Co. (C. C.
-) 11.

*An order made by a court of admiralty in
proceeding for limitation of liability re-
raining all persons having claims growing out
the transaction which is the basis of the pro-
edings from prosecuting actions thereon in
ny other court is a bar to an action on such
claim in another court, although brought by
administrator subsequently appointed.-See-
s Adm'x v. Monongahela River Consol. Coal
Coke Co. (C. C.) 507.

A New York corporation, operating a ferry
r the carriage of passengers across the East
ver between Manhattan and Brooklyn, held
titled to a limitation of its liability for the
ath of a passenger to the value of the boat
a which he was such passenger and its freight,
der the provisions of Rev. St. §§ 4283-4285
J. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 2943, 2944].-The
outhside (D. C.) 364.

SIGNALS.

com trains, see "Railroads," § 2.
E vessels, see "Collision," § 2.

SLANDER.

e "Libel and Slander."

STATEMENT.

By witness inconsistent with testimony, see
"Witnesses," § 2.

STATES.

See "United States."

Attorney general, see "Attorney General."
Courts, see "Courts."
Exemptions to bankrupt under state laws, see
"Bankruptcy," § 10

Jurisdiction of United States court to discharge
Interstate extradition, see "Extradition," § 1.
on habeas corpus person imprisoned by state
Jurisdiction of United States court to restrain
court, see "Habeas Corpus," § 1.
corporation commission from enforcing state
law as suit against state, see "Courts," § 2.
Multifariousness in pleading in suit to enjoin
enforcement of state statute, see "Equity," § 3.
Pendency of action in state court as bar to ac-
tion in United States court, see "Abatement
and Revival," § 1.

Public lands, see "Public Lands," § 1.

Regulation of railroad rates, see "Carriers," § 1.
Restraining enforcement of state statutes fixing
railroad rates, see "Injunction," § 3.

State regulation of foreign corporations, see
"Corporations," § 5.

Supplemental pleading in suit to restrain en-
forcement of state statutes fixing freight rates,
see "Equity," § 3.

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

each.-Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United Stat
(C. C. A.) 945.

traction a statute is re-enacted or repeat
*When for purposes of an enlargement or co
with amendments, the amendatory act is
affirmation and continuation of the prior law
so far as in substance and operation it is t
only so far as it differs from the prior law.
same, and is to be regarded as new legislati
Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United States (
C. A.) 945.

§ 2. Construction and operation.

*When a legislative act is general in
terms, the title may be resorted to for the p
pose of ascertaining its proper limitations
United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Duplessis Sh
Machinery Co. (C. C. A.) 842.

As applied to subsequent repealing acts whi
do not expressly or by necessary implicati
contravene its provisions, Rev. St. § 13 [U.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 6], prescribing the forfeitur
and liabilities, is obligatory on the courts, b
beyond this is without effect.-Great Northe
Ry. Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 945

While Congress may prescribe rules affecti
after legislation which does not in terms sho
that it is to be unaffected by them, these rul
cannot be so framed as to defeat the plain i
tent of after legislation, and they cease to
effective when necessarily in conflict with
later manifestation of the legislative will
Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United States (
C. A.) 945.

*The intent of the Legislature constitutes t
law and may be as effectually manifested
what is necessarily implied as by what is e
pressed, and where there are conflicting man
festations of the legislative will the last is co
trolling.-Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Unite
States (C. C. A.) 945.

*Laws Kan. 1874, p. 143, c. 93, adopted fro
Iowa after a construction by the Supreme Cou
of that state, held adopted with such constru
tion.-Iarussi v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. (C. Q

654.

*It is proper to consider a repealed statute
arriving at a particular construction of existi
acts.-Southern Ry. Co. v. McNeill (C. C.) 756.

STATUTES CONSTRUED.

Amend. 11
Amend. 14

UNITED STATES.

CONSTITUTION.

75
.118, 79
55

STATUTES AT LARGE.
1876, March 3, ch. 137, 18 Stat. 472 [U.
S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 573]...
1884, June 26, ch. 121, § 18, 23 Stat. 57
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2945]..
1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154]..

STATUTES.

See "Treaties."
Jurisdiction of United States court to determine
constitutionality of state statutes, see "Courts,"

$ 2.

Laws delegating legislative powers, see "Con-
stitutional Law," § 2.

Laws denying equal protection of law, see "Con-
stitutional Law," § 5.

Laws impairing obligation of contracts, see
"Constitutional Law," § 4.
Multifariousness in pleading in suit to enjoin
enforcement of, see "Equity," § 3.
Restraining enforcement of state statutes, see
"Injunction," § 3.

Right of stockholder to enjoin company from
obeying state laws, see "Corporations," § 1.
Statutes as part of contract, see "Contracts,"
§ 2.
Supplemental pleading in suit to restrain en-
forcement of state statutes fixing freight rates,
see "Equity," § 3.

Provisions relating to particular subjects.
See "Adverse Possession," § 1; "Aliens," § 1;
"Appeal and Error," § 1; "Arbitration and
Award," §§ 1, 3; "Army and Navy"; "At-
torney General"; "Bankruptcy"; "Carriers,"
§ 1; "Commerce," §§ 1, 3; "Contracts," § 1;
"Copyrights," § 1; "Courts," § 1; "Criminal
Law," 1; "Customs Duties"; "Death," 8.1;
"Disorderly House"; "Eminent Domain,"
2; "Fraudulent Conveyances," § 1; "Habeas
Corpus," § 1; "Homestead," $1; "Insur-
ance," § 2; "Judgment," § 1; "Lotteries," §
1; "Maritime Liens," § 1; "Master and
Servant," § 1; "Mechanics' Liens"; "Monop-
olies," 1; "Mortgages," § 1; "Municipal
Corporations," § 1; "Navigable Waters," § 1;
"Patents," §§ 2, 3, 5; "Public Lands," § 1;
"Railroads," § 2; "Removal of Causes," § 3;
"Schools and School Districts," § 1; "Ship-
ping." 6; "Street Railroads," § 1; "Taxa-
§
tion"; "Trusts," § 1; "Witnesses," § 1.
Laws denying due process of law, see "Consti-
tutional Law," § 6.

Revenue laws, see "Internal Revenue."

§ 1. Repeal, suspension, expiration, and
revival.

*A clause generally repealing all laws and
parts of laws in conflict with the act of which
it is a part repeals nothing that would not be
equally repealed without it.-Great Northern
Ry. Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 945.

Where a later act expresses the extent to
which it is intended to repeal prior laws, as by
a clause repealing all laws and parts of laws
in conflict therewith, it excludes any implication
of a more extended repeal.-Great Northern Ry. Art. 4, § 33.
Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 945.

*To establish the repeal of a statute by im-
plication it is insufficient to show merely that
a later statute, making no mention of prior
one, employs language broad enough to cover
some part or all of it, but it must appear that
the two statutes cannot stand together; reason-
able purpose and operation being accorded to

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

32

30

100
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 64, subd. b, par. 4,
30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.
3447]

...

1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154]. Amended by
Act 1906, June 9, ch. 3591, 34 Stat. 584..
1888, Aug. 13, ch. 866, 25 Stat. 433 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901] p. 508..
1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 14, 26 Stat. 137
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1933].
1890, June 10, ch. 407, § 15, 26 Stat. 138
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1933].
1890, July 2, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200]...

[blocks in formation]

1890, Oct. 1, ch. 1244, § 1, Schedule N,
par. 456, 26 Stat. 601..

554

1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 24b, 30 Stat. 553
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432].
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 38, subd. 5, 30 Stat.
555 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3435]..... 694
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 396, 30 Stat. 556
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3436]..
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 57, subd. n, 30 Stat.
561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3444]..
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 60b, 30 Stat. 562
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3445]. Amend-
ed by Act 1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 13, 32
Stat. 799 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905,
p. 689]....

100

692

686

1891, March 3, ch. 565, 26 Stat. 1110 [U.
S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3417]..
1893, Feb. 9, ch. 74, 27 Stat. 434 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 3391].

116

684

...

531

1897, March 3, ch. 395, 29 Stat. 695 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 589]...

543

1897, June 4, ch. 2, 30 Stat. 34 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, p. 1538].

612

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule A, pars.
20, 67, 30 Stat. 152, 154 [U. S. Comp.
St. 1901, pp. 1628, 1631]..

264

1897, July 24, ch. 11. § 1, Schedule A, pars.
70, 72, 30 Stat. 155 [U. S. Comp. St.

1901, p. 1631]..

143

1897, July 24, ch. 11. § 1, Schedule C, par.
140, 30 Stat. 162 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,

233

267

612

... 436

p. 1639].

213

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule L, pars.
387, 388, 30 Stat. 186 [U. S. Comp. St.
1901, p. 1670]....

253

146

.149, 303

1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule L, par.
390, 30 Stat. 187 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,
p. 1670].
1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule M,
pars. 400, 407, 30 Stat. 188, 189 [U. S.
Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1672, 1673].....
1897, July 24, ch. 11, § 1, Schedule N, par.
411, 30 Stat. 190 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901,
p. 1673].

[blocks in formation]

398, July 1, ch. 541, § 14a, 30 Stat. 550
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427].
898, July 1, ch. 541, § 14b, 30 Stat. 550
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427].....645, 688
898, July 1, ch. 541, § 14b, 30 Stat. 550
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427]. Amend-
ed by Act 1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 4b, 32
Stat. 797 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905,
p. 684]...

.553, 674
271

898, July 1, ch. 541, § 21a, 30 Stat. 552
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3430].

155 F.-68

[blocks in formation]

38

100

1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 70, 30 Stat. 565
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451]...
1898, July 1, ch. 541, § 70a(5), 30 Stat. 566
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451].....
1899, March 2, ch. 377, 30 Stat. 993...
1899, March 3, ch. 425, § 15, 30 Stat. 1152
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3543].
1899, March 3, ch. 429, 30 Stat. 1253.
1901, March 2, ch. 806, 31 Stat. 943 [U.
S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2302]...
1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 4b, 32 Stat. 797. [U.
S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 684]...553, 674
1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 13, 32 Stat. 799 [U.
S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 689]....
1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 15, 32 Stat. 800
[U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 690].... 272
1903, Feb. 19, ch. 708, 32 Stat. 847 [U. S.
Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 599]......305, 945
1903, March 3, ch. 1012, § 9, 32 Stat. 1215
[U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 279].... 428
1903, March 3, ch. 1019, 32 Stat. 1225 [U.
S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 633]..
842
1904, April 28, ch. 1778, 33 Stat. 529.... 38
1906, June 11, ch. 3073, 34 Stat. 232. 433
1906, June 29, ch. 3591, 34 Stat. 584..849, 945
1906, June 29, ch. 3591, § 10, 34 Stat.
595
945
1907, Feb. 20, ch. 1134, § 3, 34 Stat. 899.. 938

[blocks in formation]

753 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 592]...... 190
§ 914 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 683]..389, 651
88 915, 916 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 684].. 389
& 1041 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 724].... 510
1778 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1211]... 667
4283 U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2943]..11, 364
§§ 4284, 4285 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp.
2943, 2944....

[blocks in formation]
« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »